Legacy.
 

Radio host Michael Reagan, s has vowed not to vote this November as protest against today's gay marriage ruling. "I am taking my ballot and mailing it directly to the Supreme Court of California… to allow the judges to decide for us. We have seen this time and time again, Democracy usurped, the voters wishes do not matter, whether its Proposition 187 or the Gay Marriage Ban, its no longer We the People, it is now, They the Judges… As the son of a former Governor of this state and United States President, I am disgusted." Strong words from a man who continues to define himself by his dead father. [Reagan.com]

Comments (23)

No. 1 · Peter

Awesome, I hope he tells all his followers to do the same. An election without them would be wonderful for us!

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 5:46 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · danielk

…uh has he been brain dead for the last 8 years? It hasn't been We The People since Bush took office.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 5:54 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 3 · BobP

Isn't he adopted?

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 6:46 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Rick Heintz

There is a poll on this twits website asking if the supreme court decision is a good thing… I say we shock the hell out the republicans

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 6:46 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 5 · DanGOP

Oh please…sorry, Mr. Reagan. Your father would be really quite embarassed to hear you make that statement, as I am sure your mother currently is. The laws of any government may not violate any Constitution, else they are void. Did you miss that day of civics class? Apparently, like most children from the 80s forward, you didn't learn civics. No, the court was doing just what it is supposed to do, checking the will of the people against the Constitution.

Gah, I'm a Republican and I'm embarassed by this jackass. He claims to be aware of the government's structure, but apparently has zero clue with regard to the function of the courts to be a check against the power of the people. Idiot.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 6:48 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Timothy Kincaid

Chief Justice Ronald George, a Republican, authored the decision. George received his first judicial appointment in 1972 to the Los Angeles Municipal Court by none other than Governor Ronald Reagan.

In fact, six of the seven justices were appointed by Republican governors. Talk about all those "liberal activist judges" that Democrats appoint.

Considering that there will probably be a gay marriage amendment on the ballot, I'll be happy to help Michael Reagan address the envelope to send his ballot to the CSC. I'll even pay for the stamp.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 6:51 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Timothy

"There is a poll on this twits website asking if the supreme court decision is a good thing… I say we shock the hell out the republicans"

Ooooh, fun. And you can vote more than once :)

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 6:55 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 8 · Rick Heintz

You sure can!

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 6:58 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 9 · Rock

Why oh why didn't Jane Wyman get her tubes tied when she had the chance? Then we'd be spared this embarrassment.

And to think she fucked Reagan!

Loved her on Falcon Crest though. Angela Channing could whip Hillary's ass.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 7:08 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 10 · Bob R

“I am taking my ballot and mailing it directly to the Supreme Court of California… to allow the judges to decide for us. We have seen this time and time again, Democracy usurped, the voters wishes do not matter, whether its Proposition 187 or the Gay Marriage Ban, its no longer We the People, it is now, They the Judges…

Isn't this precisely what happened in the Presidential race of 2000? Didn't the Supreme Court of the United States decide who was going to be President? Didn't the Supreme Court of The United States stop the re-counting of ballots in Florida and usurp Florida's Supreme Court and decided an issue that should have been decided by the State? I think "they the judges" established that precedent in 2000 and so now you turds need to get used to it when it doesn't always go your way. As a result of "those judges" we've been stuck with that sociopathic coward Bush when he should have been consigned to the dung heap on his Texas "ranch". And as far as being Reagan's son, I would venture a guess that the best part of you dribbled down Ronbo's leg.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 7:28 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 11 · ggreen

I wonder which one of Reagan’s multiple-marriages he considers the most at risk by allowing same sex marriage? Even his adopted mother (Jane Wyman) refused to go to any more of Michael’s weddings after the first two.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 8:01 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 12 · CHURCHILL-Y

No. 6 · Timothy Kincaid , you beat me to it.
Well said.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 8:55 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Oh.No...

No 11: you took the words out of my keyboard.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 9:40 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 14 · Jack Jett

When did Michael Reagan start looking like
Joan Van Ark?

I would like to send Michael RayGun bill for that that fucking long drawn out funeral extravaganza that he and Nancy demanded for "The Giblet". It lasted two weeks and had the nerve to pre empt "The Price Is Right".

Sadly, I am such a star fucker that I would still dry fuck him with a new bottle of Rush.

Posted: May 15, 2008 at 10:49 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 15 · underbear1

michael reagan is to the reagan family, what stephen baldwin is to the baldwin family.

the SPECIAL reagan.

btw, michael hope your dad is slowly revolving on a spit in a napalm-fueled white hot corner of HELL, for his DEADLY silence and total indifferance to the AIDS pandemic, while hundreds of thousands of us were dying on the streets.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 2:41 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 16 · CitizenGeek

Hah, the poll on his website about whether the decision was a good thing or a bad is being overwhelmingly (95%!) won by the Yes side!

Michael Reagan is really representative of most Republicans: they only like the constitution when it suits them. When it denies rights to gay people and let's them have their machine guns, they'll protect the constitution. But when it goes against what they want, they're somehow anti-constitution. Sad.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 2:59 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 17 · underbear1

btw dim witted web unsavvy michael,

I pushed your web question about supreme court correctly deciding the gay marriage issue from 94% yes, to 95% yes….buh hahahaha!

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 3:00 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 18 · Dexpat Mike

Thank you DanGOP! Somebody please make this argument. All we ever hear about is activist judges. Judges protec minorty rights and counter the possible tryanny of the majority. Did anybody read de Tocqueville?!? Maybe basic civics as Dan points out? Seriously, these guys should be shot through with holes the second they speak, they don't have a leg to stand on, but somehow the left keeps loosing this argument. AGh!

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 5:15 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 19 · Mr C

Hey Rock #9 You said: Why oh why didn’t Jane Wyman get her tubes tied when she had the chance? Then we’d be spared this embarrassment.

And to think she fucked Reagan!

Don't worry he was adopted by Jane and Maureen was their only child and Patti and Ron Jr was by Nancy

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 8:23 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 20 · hells kitchen guy

He was actually adopted by Reagan and Jane Wyman. I knew his birth mother.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 8:57 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 21 · todd

What a douche bag - I can't imagine Jane Wyman raising such a moron.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 9:56 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 22 · Lee

Michael Reagan is not a Reagan - he was adopted and he was always a loser.

Nobody likes him.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 10:11 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 23 · BobP

You'll notice that they are NOT referred to as "Liberal judges". The reason that bush coined the phrase "activist judges" is because the Massachusettes judges were mostly republican and since he couldn't call them Liberal judges he had to come up with another word. Well, maybe not HIM, but one of his lackies.
Now we have California "activist judges" to thank.

Posted: May 16, 2008 at 6:59 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

Scroll Posts
 


Queerty Team

Editor
Japhy Grant

Editorial Director
David Hauslaib

Publisher
Jossip Initiatives

Our Network

Jossip The gossip's gossip sheet

Mollygood Splaying celebrities from A- to D-list

Stereohyped Once you blog black, you never go back

About

Advertise

Privacy

RSS

 
Copyright 2008 Jossip Initiatives LLC