Comments on: Lesbian Lawyer Appeals Historic Custody Ruling http://www.queerty.com/lesbian-lawyer-appeals-historic-custody-ruling-20081003/ Free of an agenda. Except that gay one. Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:56:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Sean S. http://www.queerty.com/lesbian-lawyer-appeals-historic-custody-ruling-20081003/#comment-84944 Sean S. Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:11:46 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=29566#comment-84944 Nimocks is talking out of his ass; traditionally, yes, someone who merely lived with someone else with kids, and even those who are married, don't necessarily have to adopt the children of their partner from a previous marriage or relationship. But she DID. Which makes any sort of ranting about it ridiculous. It's pretty cut and dry. Nimocks is talking out of his ass; traditionally, yes, someone who merely lived with someone else with kids, and even those who are married, don’t necessarily have to adopt the children of their partner from a previous marriage or relationship. But she DID. Which makes any sort of ranting about it ridiculous. It’s pretty cut and dry.

]]> By: Chris http://www.queerty.com/lesbian-lawyer-appeals-historic-custody-ruling-20081003/#comment-84890 Chris Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:02:58 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=29566#comment-84890 "If Miss Kulstad was a man, we would still be in the case and making the same arguments" Oh, of course they wouldn't! What a load of horseshit!! I'm thinking the only reason that Mr. Nimocks is representing Ms. Maniaci is because his sleazeball legal group is representing her for free, and has a VERY different agenda than Ms. Maniaci. “If Miss Kulstad was a man, we would still be in the case and making the same arguments”

Oh, of course they wouldn’t! What a load of horseshit!!

I’m thinking the only reason that Mr. Nimocks is representing Ms. Maniaci is because his sleazeball legal group is representing her for free, and has a VERY different agenda than Ms. Maniaci.

]]>