AIDS IS OUR FRIEND.

YOU BET YOU TOOK YOUR CAUSE BACK 10 YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > http://carrieprejean-sex-tape.blogspot.com

good quality…

You are an intelligent but angry person filled with hate, resentment, and a selfish agenda.

I didn’t count how many times you’ve used it, but the word, ‘bigot’ seems to be a favorite of yours. You have no tolerance for those who do not support your views and have no tolerance for the opinions of others if they differ from yours.

You have ‘utter intolerance’, in fact.

She doesn’t think it’s right, and likely voted against same sex marriage. That’s intolerance. She didn’t qualify her remarks with anything but a complete misunderstanding of marriage.

Her response was far more polite and less destructive than the hetrophobe reaction.

There’s not such thing as heterophobia as heterophobes are not victims of it. No one is fired from a job for being a white heterosexual male…not true if one is gay or lesbian. This is a meme that you idiots created to make yourself the victims while at the same time inflicting your homophobia by minimizing real homophobia. You’re trash.

She mace no attempt to destroy any group or individual. She supported for the most part the exact referendum that the state of California overwhelmingly adopted.

But you lying lair, CA didn’t overwhelmingly “adopt” it; it won by a slim majority…an almost simple majority, in fact. And she’s a bigoted intolerant piece of trash.

Virtually the same point of view expressed by the new president in fact.

No, it’s not.

————-

@larry

However, the race argument is just nor relevant to this conversation.

It is relevant because you’re relying on the exact same unsound flawed reasoning in making your argument for the “good of the species”. Exact same reasoning as racists did when they advocated for the sterilization of black men. YOu are a sick puppy.

I am not saying gays are inferior, never have. But same sex relationships must reproduce unnaturally.

You’re just repeating your lies which I have demonstrated are lies, and not addressing what I’ve stated. I can do that, too.

You forget that sexual orientation really has nothing at all to do with sexual reproduction. There are many species which reproduce which cannot be said to have a sexual orientation. In fact, consider that many lgbt people do reproduce, and most CAN reproduce, that implies that sexual orientation has nothing to do with the “survival of the human race”.

But don’t let reasoning and facts get in the way of your homophobia.

However, the race argument is just nor relevant to this conversation. I am not saying gays are inferior, never have. But same sex relationships must reproduce unnaturally. Natural reproduction among humans is attained through the joining of a man and a woman only. Your point that not all humans can reproduce, while true, doesn’t matter. Most can. Virtually no offspring can be born ‘naturally’ to a gay couple. Why?

Selection has nothing to do with my point, either. I agree their are other ways life reproduces and maintains itself. Those means are natural.

I agree there are species that reproduce without sexual orientation, but not humans.

Overpopulation can be addressed through several different means to bring it under control. Extinction cannot.

You made be laugh with the, “homophobic bigots like you” comment. It most likely wasn’t supposed to be funny, but that’s how it struck me.

Thank you for your point of view, I feel the need to reconsider some of my thoughts, and that’s the real benefit of arguing.

“She was utterly intolerant in her statement on her beliefs with regard to same sex marriage, and so are you.”

She was quite tolerant. “Tolerant” however does not require outright acceptance of a position that conflicts with yours an the surrender of your right to disagree . Her response was far more polite and less destructive than the hetrophobe reaction.

She mace no attempt to destroy any group or individual. She supported for the most part the exact referendum that the state of California overwhelmingly adopted. Virtually the same point of view expressed by the new president in fact.

In fact the hetrophobe community could well be the poster people for intolerance.

The gay community needs to prove tolerance to a far greater degree than the hetrophobes at this site are showing. What Tank says Larry needs to prove is not an issue here.

Homosexuality may occur naturally, but it defies reproduction. It cannot be perfectly natural then.

Homosexuality doesn’t defy reproduction. Look up unit of selection, again, to educate yourself on evolution. Natural selection may operate on groups of organisms as well as individual organism. We see ample evidence for both.

Neither does heterosexuality. You forget that sexual orientation really has nothing at all to do with sexual reproduction. There are many species which reproduce which cannot be said to have a sexual orientation. In fact, consider that many lgbt people do reproduce, and most CAN reproduce, that implies that sexual orientation has nothing to do with the “survival of the human race”.

My comments on homosexuality being unnatural refer only to reproduction. Homosexuality and race are two different things entirely and race has no business in this conversation.

But it does. It is the exact same argument given by eugenicists that black people were inferior to white people, and were not good for the human race.

Overpopulation is better than extinction, would you agree?

Not if it leads to extinction, no. Same destination.

“You people”? Please define “you people”. All hetrosexuals? Or everyone, regardless of lifestyle, that disagrees with you?

Bigots, specifically homophobic bigots like you.

I have no fear or contempt toward the gay community. Therefore, I am not a ‘homophobe’.

But you do have contempt. You just don’t understand that saying that homosexuality isn’t good for the survival of the species (a frantic, hate filled idea that justifies and has justified all measure of evil) is contempt.

If you think that there’s a biological advantage for all of our traits, then obviously homosexuality is a trait not just found in humans. So there must be a biologial advantage. But once again, it proves without a shadow of a doubt that sexual orientation has nothing to do with sexual reproduction.

One other thing I’d like to comment on…

Homosexuality may occur naturally, but it defies reproduction. It cannot be perfectly natural then.

First, being black has no effect on whether or not the human race continues. My comments on homosexuality being unnatural refer only to reproduction. Homosexuality and race are two different things entirely and race has no business in this conversation.

Overpopulation is better than extinction, would you agree?

“You people”? Please define “you people”. All hetrosexuals? Or everyone, regardless of lifestyle, that disagrees with you?

I have no fear or contempt toward the gay community. Therefore, I am not a ‘homophobe’.

Well, apparently it isn’t. Most of our DNA is junk, actually (high 90th percentile). And you should look up unit of selection before you start talking about things you don’t understand very well, like evolution.

I don’t agree with your views, that makes me utterly intolerant?

No, that you class homosexuality unnatural, and therefore, wrong makes you utterly intolerant. You people like to gloss over the SUBSTANCE of your disagreement in spinning “I just disagree. It’s a free country.” I imagine your ideological progenitors said the same thing about black people, and how they weren’t of the same species…but they just disagree.

You’re wrong, of course, but you can’t know that from my brief posts here.

Well, no. I’m not wrong. Your beliefs here reveal complete intolerance and homophobia.

You could only know that by knowing me

I don’t have to know a lot about you or anything really to know that you’re a homophobe and to know what you believe by what you stated about homosexuality being “unnatural”. You don’t know what the word means. Anything that naturally occurs is natural. Homosexuality naturally occurs…hence, it’s natural.

and I think you could only know how intolerant she is or isn’t by knowing her, not from that short answer she gave.

I don’t believe it’s in our best interests as a species to be gay, that’s all.

I don’t think it’s in the best interest of the species to be straight given overpopulation. That’s like saying you don’t think it’s in the best interest of the species to be black, and underscores a commitment to eugenics…

Hi Tank,

Who or how we were designed doesn’t matter. The idea is to keep reproducing.

I don’t agree with your views, that makes me utterly intolerant? You’re wrong, of course, but you can’t know that from my brief posts here. You could only know that by knowing me and I think you could only know how intolerant she is or isn’t by knowing her, not from that short answer she gave.

I don’t believe it’s in our best interests as a species to be gay, that’s all.

But all beings aren’t designed by skydaddy (which you need to establish) and designed to reproduce. Some people can’t reproduce.

She was utterly intolerant in her statement on her beliefs with regard to same sex marriage, and so are you.

a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

Utterly intolerant. She did not sound ‘utterly intolerant’ in her response.

I think homosexuality is unnatural. That’s only because all beings are designed to reproduce; it’s what keeps the species going. If all human beings were hetrosexual, they would continue to reproduce and the species lives on. If all humans were gay, it would be the end of the line wihout unnatural help, ie., invitro fertilization; donor wombs, surrogate mothers, etc.

Live and let live; that’s my motto. But it seems to me, a natural union of hetrosexual couples makes the most sense. If you are gay, I don’t care, but don’t ask me to think it’s perfectly all right, because it isn’t perfect.

Well sorry people but however much you hate her that won’t make faggetry any less sinful!

Which of your pairs of genitals are you pointing at now? Eh shaddup, you illiterate hermaphrodite.

He went back home, still a bitter loser and launched his misogynistic hate attack. Result ? He probably did the cause a lot more harm than good. He exposed the hatefilled hetrophobic minority to the point where many folks may feel they are the norm in the gay community. Sorry Perez, temper tantrums from spoiled brats are bad enough. When they include blatantly sexist hateful actions it becomes deplorable.

I feel bad for the many good people that have been sullied by their association with the likes of Perez.

Thanks again for the lovely photos even the ones that were lamely faked in the pitiful, hateful attempt to smear a person for simply excersising ,politely free speech.