
If a gay couple adopts a child in New York, they're now entitled to list both names on the birth certificate as parents. In Louisiana, that's not allowed, owing to adoption regulations that forbid "single" (read: unwed) individuals from even adopting children there. But what if a gay Louisiana couple adopts a child from New York? Well, things get murky, until they don't:
Louisiana has 15 days to add the names of both fathers to the birth certificate of a boy born in Shreveport and adopted by a gay couple from out-of-state, a federal judge has ruled. The state is asking the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ruling by U.S. District Judge Jay Zainey, and to halt the order in the meantime, state Attorney General Buddy Caldwell said Thursday.
"The federal district court has significantly misinterpreted Louisiana vital records law, forcing Louisiana to import and adopt New York law," he wrote in a brief e-mailed statement.
Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith, who now live in San Diego, but adopted the boy in New York state, want both their names on his birth certificate.
State officials say that's illegal because, under Louisiana law, two single people cannot adopt a child. Zainey ruled in December that because the adoption became formal in New York, the Office of Vital Records must recognize that state's adoption law on the matter. New York officials decided in January that same-sex couples could list both names on their children's birth certificates. [SJMN]
Photo: Flickr/chadisalem
1,500 Of You Complained Because Adam Lambert Got Mock Head on TV (18)
· SPAB_Book says: http://tinyurl.com/y88kgs b »
TELL QUEERTY: How Are You Spending Thanksgiving? (16)
· christopher di spirito says: This is our last Thanksgiving in New York. A lot of our house is in... »
· Mark says: LIving overseas so no Thanksgiving; though even if I were in the States, wouldn’t... »
PHOTOS: He’s Got a Pera Aces (1)
· Daniel says: Fantastic muscle definition. »
People Forgot to Mention Anything Gay About ‘Sexiest Rising Star’ Matt Bomer (23)
· Taylor says: I don’t get the point. I think he’s a very sexy guy no matter if he’s... »
So Lady Gaga Was Pretty Great at the AMAs. And Adam Lambert Was Pretty Terrible (96)
· mikeandrewsdantescove says: Thanks for posting all the performances. It was obvious to me that Janet... »
Miriam Mercado Just Became Puerto Rico’s Judy Shepard (2)
· blackjack44 says: this is so very sad and because of this story i will be adding a chapter to the... »
EXCUSES: The Senate Just Knocked DADT’s Hearings Into Next Year (30)
· Daniel says: Just remember to vote in the Democratic primaries and hold any democrat accountable for... »
PHOTOS: Rebel With a Cause (22)
· allancsn says: Not telling – off to the gym. »
British Churches Won’t Be Allowed to Ban Gay Employees. Would That Fly in America? (17)
· Bill Perdue says: In No. 15 • Javier tells us that the overwhelming majority of society respects... »
I love it.
As more and more of these inconsistencies come to light, it will finally become apparent that the only true equality is FEDERAL EQUALITY, and that Obama and McCain's ridiculous "State issue" view is unworkable.
Good news!
We had an equally murky (actually very good news) case here last year involving a lesbian couple and the birth father, who was actively involved in the family. An Ontario court recognized all three of them as parents:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/toron.....court.html
And Strepsi… I agree with you that ultimately your country will have to deal with these equality issues on the federal level. Marriage and family law are provincial jurisdiction here too, but the ruling to recognize marriage equality was made by our federal Supreme Court.
George W already threw down the gauntlet in your country. Sooner or later somebody – pro or con – is going to take this to your supreme court or try to change your federal constitution.
Child of a gay couple or fan of a bad, short-lived 80s sitcom?