Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
 

Madge Files Suit For Longer NYC Chain

madonna_chains_narrowweb__300×4210-2.jpg
Madonna may have a 6,000 square foot apartment overlooking Central Park, but the singer wants more. Unfortunately her building’s board doesn’t seem willing to grant her wishes, so Madonna’s getting litigious:

Madonna is burning up – and she’s suing – because her ritzy upper West Side co-op allegedly won’t let her expand her material world into a neighboring apartment.

The Material Girl has filed a summons in Manhattan Supreme Court against the board and management company at her Central Park West pad, a luxury building where she already owns a 6,000- square-foot duplex with its own gym and beauty salon.

The two-page summons accuses the co-op board and Midboro Management of breach of contract for allegedly holding up the sale of Julie Clark Thayer’s seventh-floor apartment and orders the transfer of 868 co-op shares to the singer.

That board better cooperate! We all know what happens when Madonna get angry: she grows to ten times her height, breathes fire and makes us all listen to Music.

Ahhh!

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Dec 7, 2007
Tagged: , , , ,
12 Comments

No. 1 · Chris

“Music” is a good album. :-P

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 11:19 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · afrolito · Member · 1242 comments

It’s a great album.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 11:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Dawster · Member · 592 comments

well… she’s already “taken over the world”… so really… what’s one more apartment?

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 11:30 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · hells kitchen guy

She’s only there a few weeks out of the year. Her kids are enrolled in UK schools. You’d think 6K ft would be enough. She’s already got the biggest apt. in 1 W. 64th St.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 1:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · ProfessorVP

It reminds me of when I lived in SF, Robin Williams, then at the top of showbiz food chain, owned a house atop a cliff with a sweeping view of the bay and bridge. He then proceeded to expand it, and nothing less would do; he had to make it bigger, bigger. His neighbors took him to court for blocking THEIR view. It’s a star thing, I guess.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 1:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Jon · Member · 171 comments

I don’t live in New York, but I’ve heard that Co-Op boards give people shit all the time. Is this true? Any New Yorkers out there who’ve had a bad experience with a co-op board?

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 2:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · hells kitchen guy

Jon: I own a co-op. You have to go through the managing agent to wipe your ass after you take a shit. It’s every bit as bad as you’ve heard. On the other hand, to get into a co-op, you have to have good financials and not overleverage your borrowing, so no mortgage crisis, which is probably why NYC is still so ridiculously epxensive to buy in.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 2:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · hisurfer

I deal with assholes – famous and not, but all rich – like this daily. They come here, want to clear cut a swatch of rain forest, or close off a stretch of beach, to build their dream vacation house, then cry and bitch and sue when we force them to follow the guidelines set forth in OUR laws.

So I shouldn’t be surprised that Madonna is any different. And yet I’m still kind of disappointed.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 2:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · spunkbox · Member · 40 comments

I liked her better when she was eating McDonald’s french fries out of the trash in Alphabet City. Wretched old cow. But I still like ‘Ray of Light’!

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 3:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · hells kitchen guy

Madonna, meet Helen Lawson.

Posted: Dec 7, 2007 at 3:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Jaroslaw

I too clicked on the link. Shame Queerty didn’t let us know over 1/2 of the text was Christian fundamentalism from this guy. Since he is so righteous and accuses the paper of “not telling the whole truth about “equality” – because it would lead to same sex health benefits etc. How about the Bible prohibits divorce, recommends stoning for children who don’t behave and prohibits the charging of interest? Here’s a fun tidbit – when I worked for an HMO, of course the member, spouse and children under 18 were covered on the (heterosexual) family plan. Guess what Mr. “Morals” Stec? If the child had a child, we covered him/her also, free of charge! I have never heard any “moral outrage” about this! Wonder what else goes on the majority of us don’t know about? I would have never known that if I didn’t work there. And try to get credit cards to stop charging interest!

Posted: Dec 9, 2007 at 10:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Jaroslaw

sorry, the above post is in the wrong spot. My computer turned off and on……

Posted: Dec 9, 2007 at 10:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.