Queerty is better as a member
Most of these women are vile. They lack modesty for starters. They use their bodies and their sexuality – fake or otherwise – as a marketing ploy. It’s time we revolted against them.
Madonna, in particular, exploited the naïve mentalities of gay men to make a lot of money. Gay guys would dance to her songs and fill up her bank account.
Remember when gay guys used to sniff amyl and shake their collective uteruses to “Vogue” while mentally thinking “she’s on our side, she’s on our side, dammit”. Well, here’s the truth: she was not really on our side.
Madonna’s strategy was to appeal to the sleazy straight guy fantasy (using nudity and lesbianism) by using gay men as a cover. This enabled her to get away with it.
If Madonna is reading Queerty, here is what I have to say to you: we have worked you out. Now give the money back to us.
Speaking of fakes, JimBryant is here to post yet another rant about how women are terrible, probably based on some sort of mental illness or childhood trauma. But what he hates more than women is open and proud gay men, because they don’t feel compelled to adhere to his desired qualities of masculinity he harps on about under the name Rick on Towleroad. You got a glimpse of that in his comment about gays sniffing amyl and having fun (aka promiscuous, he REALLY hates sexually empowered gay men).
If only Jim…I mean Rick…could give us the time we spent reading is drivel back. Or get some help.
Don’t waste Queerty’s bandwidth on me. You’re supposed to talk on the topic at hand.
I won’t resile at all from what I’ve said. Sharon Stone is particularly nasty, a totally ridiculous woman.
You’re right, Rick: you’re not worth it. Especially since you’ve dedicated your online presence to trashing everyone else. You’re pathetic. As you put it “nasty, a totally ridiculous woman.”
Maybe you should take an aspirin.
Aww Jim, is that all you got? Oh right: you can’t post nasty comments under my name to get back at me like you do to people on Towleroad. Loser :)
I’d hope to be as timelessly gorgeous as any of these women by the time I’m their age.
I for one admire many of these women.. but I DO draw the line at “going straight” for them.
The woman hasn’t been born on this planet who could sway my sexual preference.
Newsflash: gay guys won’t go straight for any woman. So, this is quite ridiculous.
@Dixie Rect: That’s the spirit, the article’s title is meant to be literal.
Why anyone would want to turn straight for Madonna is beyond me. And if a bisexual were interested in Demi Moore, there should be about a 20-year age difference since she is a cradle robber.
Graym, you are so – obvious.
I only fall for women real women, not these Grade B Drag Queens anyway.
What you need to understand about these women is that they are fakes. Their faces are not real. Their faces are the result of lipstick, powder, eyeliner and mascara. These are faces manufactured by Revlon and Maybelline.
Fake faces, fake sexuality…no wonder you can’t trust women.
Graham – please stop!
LMAO no one is going straight for these ladies at least bring some sexiness. Not that I would go straight anyway but at least make it realistic.
Imagine pulling of Madge’s clothes to reveal that leathery skin *barfs*
The amount of misogyny, sexism and ageism in the comments above is just baffling. These are strong and beautiful women, all of them. Have some respect, people.
Ms. Stone is probably the only woman on earth who could turn me straight. Still doubtful, but if she did turn for an evening, I dont think I’d regret it.
And we should trust your word because? You’ve already demonstrated that you’re a troll. Your opinion is worthless, if not amusing.
Real men support real women, not Madame Tussaud Wax figures straight out of the sexist catalogue of the hetero male patriarchy.
@Rockery: DEAD, lmao. True, basically my opinion too, but less harsh I guess lol.
So all these so called religious nuts are right ? We can be turned straight? Good luck with that you ass . Why don’t you just come out and tell everyone we are gay because of choice ? What a dip !
So homosexuality is a “choice”?
We already knew that…
What’s wrong with the choice vs. not choice argument is that it plays into the homophobe’s world view as if there is something wrong with being gay. After all, who would “choose” to be gay? “It’s not our fault we’re gay. We have no choice.”
Personally, I choose to be queer. I choose to be gay. I have no problem with the vadge but I prefer penis. I choose penis and there’s nothing wrong with it. I’m proud of my choice. And if some homophobe says that makes me evil or whatever (yadda, yadda), your opinion doesn’t mean jack because you’re a narrow-minded idiot.
Please log in to add your comment.
Need an account? Register It's free and easy.
PHOTOS: Broadway Gets Into Winter Burlesque With Calendar Girl
PHOTOS: Prohibition Returns to NYC With the Roaring New Twenty Something Party
PHOTOS: The Sundance Queer Preview — 2014 Edition
Long, Loose and Colorful: Fashion Trends For 2014
Most Talked About Model Interviews Of 2013