<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maine&#8217;s Marriage Opponents Already on the Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: afrolito</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/#comment-161421</link>
		<dc:creator>afrolito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=52561#comment-161421</guid>
		<description>Are there enough blacks in Maine to get the required amount of signatures? If not, i&#039;m sure they can be brought in for a symbolic show of homophobic solidarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there enough blacks in Maine to get the required amount of signatures? If not, i&#8217;m sure they can be brought in for a symbolic show of homophobic solidarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeAnimator</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/#comment-161202</link>
		<dc:creator>DeAnimator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 07:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=52561#comment-161202</guid>
		<description>Is everyone missing the point that was set in the 60s and oh, I don&#039;t know, a human rights thing- YOU CANNOT VOTE ON A MINORITY&#039;S RIGHTS! 

Slippery slope. Soon the poor, racially &#039;unpure&#039;, &#039;dangerous atheists&#039;, etc will be legislated against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is everyone missing the point that was set in the 60s and oh, I don&#8217;t know, a human rights thing- YOU CANNOT VOTE ON A MINORITY&#8217;S RIGHTS! </p>
<p>Slippery slope. Soon the poor, racially &#8216;unpure&#8217;, &#8216;dangerous atheists&#8217;, etc will be legislated against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/#comment-160638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=52561#comment-160638</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-160637&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jason&lt;/a&gt;: er, i mean the Maine governor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a class="atr_link" href="#comment-160637" rel="nofollow">Jason</a>: er, i mean the Maine governor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/#comment-160637</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=52561#comment-160637</guid>
		<description>Lynch is the New Hampshire Governor. The Main Governor is Baldacci.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynch is the New Hampshire Governor. The Main Governor is Baldacci.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/maines-marriage-opponents-already-on-the-case-20090508/#comment-160612</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/?p=52561#comment-160612</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s absolutely no question in my mind that they will get the required number of signatures.  They&#039;ll use the churches, like they always do.  So this will be on the ballot in an off year election.  The question is, what is the ground game proponents have planned? 

 Also, the Maine constitution is very strongly worded on equal protection and privacy.  I&#039;m kind of surprised no one tried a lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s absolutely no question in my mind that they will get the required number of signatures.  They&#8217;ll use the churches, like they always do.  So this will be on the ballot in an off year election.  The question is, what is the ground game proponents have planned? </p>
<p> Also, the Maine constitution is very strongly worded on equal protection and privacy.  I&#8217;m kind of surprised no one tried a lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

