Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  Equal & Opposite

Mainstream Media Ignores Hillary’s Landmark U.N. Speech, Anti-Gay Groups Lose Their Shit Over It

Christian Groups Respond to Clinton’s Human-Rights Address to the UN

Family Research Council Senior Douchebag fellow Peter Sprigg made the following comments:

It is startling that President Obama is prepared to throw the full weight and reputation of the United States behind the promotion overseas of the radical ideology of the sexual revolution. If he did the same on other issues, his own liberal allies would undoubtedly accuse him of cultural imperialism. Threats to withhold foreign aid from poor countries unless they conform their laws to the views of Western radicals are unconscionable.

The United Nations, like the United States, remains sharply divided on the issue of whether special rights should be granted on the basis of sexual conduct, sexual orientation or gender identity. No treaty or widely accepted international agreement has established homosexual conduct as a human right, yet the Obama administration’s actions seem guided by this fiction.

President Obama should increase efforts to defend human rights that are widely recognized, such as religious liberty, rather than appeasing his domestic allies by imposing an alien ideology on other countries.

Who says defending religious liberty globally doesn’t go right along with defining gay rights? And the sexual revolution is not a radical ideology, it’s a historical fact that happened 40 years ago. Perhaps the FRC should catch up to it.

By:           Evan Mulvihill
On:           Dec 7, 2011
Tagged: , , , ,

  • 22 Comments
    • Jake
      Jake

      I absolutely love Mrs Clinton. Intelligent, eloquent and bigger balls than everyone else in American politics. Bravo Hillary, you’d have my vote!

      Dec 7, 2011 at 4:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • chink change
      chink change

      I applaud Mrs. Rodham. She’s a heroine for our time.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 4:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • JEREMIE
      JEREMIE

      That woman should have been president. What a missed opportunity. (I am black man.)

      Dec 7, 2011 at 4:57 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kaio
      Kaio

      USA should decide if they want to be like northern Europe, where societies are thriving and developed, or backwards like Africa. You know Ricky will take you there…

      Dec 7, 2011 at 5:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ted B. (Charging Rhino)
      Ted B. (Charging Rhino)

      Strange the Mrs. Clinton could give that speech at the UN, but I doubt Pres. Obama would have made the same speech to his own Congress.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 5:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kurt
      Kurt

      Queerty write: “Yesterday, President Obama gave international gay rights a serious boost’

      Yesterday, you bad-mouthed him and belittled this action. Doesn’t Queerty have a consistent editorial policy?

      Dec 7, 2011 at 5:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • mike
      mike

      Hillary Clinton has a track record of major human rights violations. She knows why she was in Geneva. She knows that UN officials are about to slap her administration for allowing one of her own citizens — a gay American soldier at that — to be tortured and sexually humiliated in custody. The Obama administration continues to repeatedly violate our civil and human rights. So it’s great that good things may potentially happen to some gay people as long as helping them doesn’t cross Hillary’s primary commitment to her pro-corporate foreign policy agenda. But for us to say she’s this great person on human rights ignores the fact that she as a person has a terrible record. Think twice before you gulp down what at first glance appears to be an appetizing glass of kool-aid.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 5:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mike Hipp
      Mike Hipp

      I’m trying to figure out the political calculations that brought this about. From where I sit he loses more domestically than he gains. It’s a huge boost to the LGBT and Ally community but we were pretty much going to vote for him anyway. Who else’s support did he pick up with this action?

      I have a hard time believing it was a selfless act.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 6:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • christopher di spirito
      christopher di spirito

      Too bad Hillary Clinton didn’t win the Democratic nomination.

      She’s smart and she’s fearless. She knows where all the bodies are buried and has battled the sharks in the GOP for more than 25 years.

      Unlike Barack Obama who worships Ronald Reagan and jumps into the safety of Michelle’s arms anytime John Boehner or Mitch McConnell says “boo”, Hillary knows how to stand her ground. She doesn’t back down.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 7:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Henry
      Henry

      Way to go, Hilary! In the professional opinion of two psychologists I’ve consulted, Charles Rozier has dramatic and enduring paranoid features, which qualify him indefinitely for a stay at the looney bin. They’ve told me they have deep concerns about him interacting with young people in the classroom, but I go a little farther. In my view, he shouldn’t even be able to drive.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 7:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • GayGOP
      GayGOP

      I am a staunch opponent of Foreign Aid for any purpose, including military and humanitarian purposes in almost all, maybe 99%, of cases. However, if we are to continue the stupidity of spending money protecting non-Americans, we ought to condition it on requiring countries to abide by what Secretary Clinton rightly pointed out are American values, such as secular democracy, and LGBT rights. We may not practice it, but rightly, we preach it. Now if we could do so in our own country.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 7:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Pedro
      Pedro

      @JEREMIE: So what does your color have to do with it…Get a fucking clue please!

      Dec 7, 2011 at 7:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Pedro
      Pedro

      @christopher di spirito: Are you people idiots, she works for the Obama administration…Do you think that she said one word in that speech that wasn’t first vetted by the administration? She was directed by her CIC to give that speech…Don’t forget that Hillary(whom I admire) less than a year ago stated in Australia that she did not support gay marriage(the same position as her CIC)…Yet you people love her and have disdain for Obama…

      Dec 7, 2011 at 7:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kurt
      Kurt

      @Pedro: Amen, Pedro. If any low level Administration appointee said anything mildly disagreeable, Queerty would be blaming the President. The Secretary of State speaks for the Administration.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 9:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dave
      Dave

      Anyone who refers to the lives of LGBT folks as “lifestyles” should immediately and without question be dragged away and killed by bludgeoning with a giant penis sculpture, à la Clockwork Orange.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 10:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran
      Kieran

      Isn’t 75 the median age of the typical CBS, NBC or ABC News viewer?

      Dec 7, 2011 at 11:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hephaestion
      Hephaestion

      Bravo Hillary! Anytime you wanna run for president, girl, we got your back!

      Dec 7, 2011 at 11:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Hephaestion
      Hephaestion

      Bravo to Obama, too! As Pedro above stated, he had to have approved her speech.

      Never forget this: Democrats=progress for gays. Republicans=repression & absence of justice for gays.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 11:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Cam
      Cam

      Of COURSE the Mainstream news ignored it.

      These are the same people that would have on George REckers or MAggie Gallagher as an “Expert”.

      They would rather be part of the problem than risk getting one letter from a bigot.

      Dec 7, 2011 at 11:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ripper
      Ripper

      @christopher di spirito: A lot of your comments seem angry and full of bile, chris. I think it’s long overdue you took a chill pill. You could take one every night before bed. How does that sound?

      Dec 8, 2011 at 8:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TomMc
      TomMc

      Amusing how the FRC would cite the “sharply divided” UN; a group that they’d demolish if given the chance.

      Dec 8, 2011 at 3:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dave
      Dave [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Funny I am a republican and I support Marriage, any kind of marriage, be it Gay or Straight. But here as one stated I apparently am against it and want to regress away from LGBT right, when in fact I don’t. I think that if you want to protect the values of marriage make Divorce illegal, because that is what is ruining marriage. Marriage to me is the union of two individuals that love one another. Just my two cents, but please don’t stereotype all Republicans because of the ones that are on TV they dont speak for all of us.

      Dec 8, 2011 at 9:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.