
And here we thought Barack Obama was lining up senior military leaders who supported repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell. So why is sitting Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James T. Conway circulating Pentagon memos voicing his opposition to the policy?
Well, he's not alone. Plenty of military brass don't want to see DADT repealed. Because it's be too disruptive. Or, simply, they just don't want gays prancing around!
Folks like Army Secretary John McHugh have publicly declared their divisions are ready to deal with the repeal. Incoming Under Secretary of Defense Dr. Clifford Stanley is expected to be a DADT foe.
But Conway, in "private conversations" that were relayed to the right-wing newspaper The Washington Times, is supposedly going around D.C. running his mouth about how he "feels very strongly that [removing the ban] would be disruptive, and he opposes it," according the paper's source. But on the record, Conway's camp isn't denying his beliefs; asked on the record, the Marine general's spokesman Maj. David Nevers didn't deny the allegation.
So how did Conway reach his conclusion? Well, relays the Times, he's "the only chief known to have actively surveyed his generals on the impact of removing the ban." Not that his colleagues in other branches of military appear to be so far from his position:
The four-star chiefs of the Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and Army have said little on the topic in public and have not been pressed by Congress to provide their professional opinions. All four declined to answer when asked for their personal opinions on the ban by The Times, except to say they will abide by the law.
Which is funny, because President Obama has been using that same "abide by the law" line.
The Unintended Consequences of Oprah Quitting: Silencing a Vilified Vlogger (4)
· Adrian says: Terrwill, I have a fully naked photo of Davey Wavey. I can send it to ya if you... »
· Qjersey says: If he wore clothes no one would bother to watch his vlogs. »
· Jonathan says: FINALLY! He shuts the ***** up! It was either the Oprah news or someone needed to... »
Not Gay Enough? Adam Lambert’s Lip-Lock Shows Who’s ‘Mo (5)
· Qjersey says: The director didn’t seem to mind Janet Jackson’s crotch grabbing or... »
For Her Big Return, Janet Jackson Returns to Her Entire Past (18)
· The Artist says: OMG!!!! Let me start by saying Janet is FUNtastic! Although she doesn’t have... »
Remembering the Life of Jorge Steven Lopez Mercado (25)
· Mike L. says: I wonder if the killer planted the dress or wig or whatever they found with Jorge to... »
So Lady Gaga Was Pretty Great at the AMAs. And Adam Lambert Was Pretty Terrible (56)
· niamh says: Adam’s dad occasionally posts on one of the TV forums’ Adam thread, and his username is... »
· staciegirlie says: That kiss was HAWT! AMA’s overall stage production…not so hawt. I did... »
Does an Anti-Gay Character Make (Gay Author) Bennett Madison’s Teen Book Homophobic? (4)
· Landon Bryce says: Again, and without the typo, people who have not read the book will naturally... »
The Adam Shankman + Miley Cyrus Collaboration Is Nearly Upon Us (3)
· JNunzio says: I love the typo…really hammers the point home that one would have to make an... »
So let me get this straight….he doesn't want MARINES acting "Faggy"?? This coming from a branch of service where one of the top reasons for joining are "The uniforms look good."
Seriously, if you've met 10 Marines, then you've met 8 Marines who've had gay sex. This guy is folling himself. If he doesn't want his Marines to act gay then he should start a program of neutering them immediatly.
Marines aren't sailors. All Marines are riflemen.
All it takes to make a "straight" Marine gay is a bottle of whiskey. (at least temporarily!)
Haven't I seen this guy in 'Marine Bareback Auditions, Vol. #5??? Not that I watch that stuff…
Gay or not, I just can't picture Marines "prancing." It's about as likely as dry water.
This guy is really funny, I know he loves his parent so much, but I don't want him doing any action to take care of them. Hahahaha…
Oh, but isn't looking at girl-girl pictures in men's magazines a sign of admiring homosexuality? Maybe Conway and his ilk should ban these magazines if they're going to be consistent about the evils of homosexuality.