If there’s one thing Michael Lucas knows how to do, it’s nipping things in the bud.
The porn mogul got a bit of a surprise yesterday when rival studio Spunk alleged that Lucas has been secretly funding and distributing a line of bareback porn. Well, Lucas flat out denies it. But a simple denial wouldn’t be dramatic enough to suit Lucas’ style, so he issued his “disinterested” reaction from South America, where he’s presumably on vacation.
Lucas Entertainment never had and does not have any intentions to produce bareback videos. Our company is also not concerned about Spunk Video’s motives to issue such a baseless press release.
When informed of the press release, CEO and President Michael Lucas, who at this moment is in South America, said via phone, “I’m not even remotely interested in reading Spunk Video’s press release, and Spunk Video is welcome to take any letter they have to any court they choose.”
Furthermore, Michael Lucas and Lucas Entertainment are not interested in continuing this conversation. We feel this issue was closed before ever being opened.
There’s nothing about this seems “closed.” On the contrary, this gossip simply screams “big open mess.”
Lessthan
But do they have proof? Like real Lucas-signed-on-the-dotted-line proof? Otherwise, this is just name calling and not really worth people’s time.
ggreen
Who cares? If Lucas’ BB porn is as vacuous as his latex crap it won’t be erotic either. The commercial gay porn industry is filled to the brim with hypocrites that continually spout off the latest bumper sticker about “safe sex†and anti-bare backing, etc. while living private lives of a very different kind. It’s a tiny group of elitist ass wipes that set the prices for porn and are doing their best to make it so independents can’t even get distributed. All the while making product that’s devoid of any eroticism which dumbbell gay consumers lap up like cheap vodka because they don’t know what good porn looks like. Clue one: good gay porn doesn’t get made by drag queens, straight people or in former eastern bloc countries.
hells kitchen guy
He’s a jerk, but give him credit: He’s always promoted safe sex.
Qjersey
He promotes condom use in his films, that’s it. Ask any of his former tricks… he is very aggressive about wanting to cum in your mouth…but of course, won’t offer to return the favor.
michael
Yawn! Can’t you find another piece of **** to write about? Queerty, you have really worn this one out. I just don’t get the obsession.
scott
At ggreen:
so what is considered good gay porn? I wouldn’t know because I hate porn music and like the more “realistic” porn videos. LOL.
ggreen
Well for starters: 90% of what was produced BEFORE 1989 (Without the sound of course). Costello Presley is to soundtracks what Sh*t Sh*t Larue is to Porn. I think they might be the same person.
fanboi
It looks like the 2 movies Spunk says are the same in fact are. See comparison pics on my site. Question is DOES Michael Lucas have anything to do with Galaxia Entertainment (who released the movie in question). If Lucas in involved with Galaxia, he may be screwed.
fanboi
Kind of surprised I’m not seeing more about this article. I’d like someone to find out whether Lucas has anything to do with Galaxia Entertainment (the company that is listed as the studio for the movie Spunk claims is a identical to theirs)
boxcovers prove at least one of the scenes are identical.
http://heroesnhunks.com/wordpress/2008/05/16/michael-lucas-could-be-sued-again/
Absurdist
Oh, what three years of “progress” brings…
He may not be producing bareback porn at this point, but he’s gone back on that pledge to not hire performers who’ve ever worked for bareback studios several times over (most recently with Tyler Saint and Marc Dylan).