Oh, I know we could come up with a more clever line, but what else do you say to his Esquire profile where he equates gay marriage with bestiality? There are only so many times you can put on your nerd glasses and rationally say, “Yo, sheep are not capable of consensual, loving relationship, you asshat.” He also compares being gay to being an alcoholic. You can read the fun after the jump, but this kind of crap doesn’t deserve a response.
“Later, I tell Huckabee that I once reported on a group of gay evangelical Christians â€” admittedly, a tiny group. They argue that homosexuality is not a biblical sin. Yes, Leviticus bans men lying down with other men, but that ban refers to pagan sex rituals. Jesus would not have a problem with committed, loving same-sex relationships.
Huckabee is not impressed. “How convenient. How very convenient to just put the Bible into a chronological time zone,” he answers. Huckabee says gay people can do what they want in their private lives. But gay marriage?
“The problem with changing the definition of marriage is that once you cross that line, then there’s no stopping,” he explains. He tells me that when he spoke recently in Japan, there was an American student there who objected to his views on gay marriage. “This was right in the middle of what was going on in west Texas, and I thought, Okay, how can we say that what those polygamists in west Texas are doing is wrong if we allow same-sex marriage? Who are you to tell them that that man can’t have fifteen wives? [The student said] ‘Well, it’s not the same!’ And I said, ‘Okay, well, here’s another one: bestiality. Now I know you’re going to have a problem,’ and he just went berserk on that. But there was recently an actual news story where a man wanted to marry his animal….I think it was a sheep.”
Huckabee says he doesn’t know if homosexuality is inborn, but he believes you can control the behavior. He compares homosexuality to obesity or alcoholism: “Some people have a predisposition to alcoholism. Does that mean they’re not responsible for getting drunk? No.”
I give him the liberal line: Being gay is so integral to a person’s identity that it’s not a choice, that it’s like being African-American.
“I’m especially offended by that,” he answers immediately. “Because blackness is an inescapable quality. Black is not a behavior. There’s no behavior to black. What you can say is that whatever disposition, it’s a choice. A lot of people are celibate. When people enter the priesthood, they make a choice to subjugate certain behaviors and/or feelings. It’s not that they don’t have them; it’s that they choose not to act on them.”
He talks about how he saw a news clip from a Palm Springs rally of a woman holding a cross, being accosted by gay-rights protesters who grabbed the cross out of her hands. “I watch these guys, and they’re all about love and tolerance until they lose.”
In Huckabee’s world, gay people are the oppressors and conservative Christians are the victims. What was that talk about a postpartisan world?