Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
Back to the post

What A Pitti: Leather-And-Lacing Up Milan Men’s Fashion Week

versace-lace


Back to the post
  • 9 Comments
    • The Real Mike in Asheville
      The Real Mike in Asheville

      Can anyone explain why the Thom Browne models, sporting Scottish Highland garb, have French flags painted on their faces?

      Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • MikeE
      MikeE

      @The Real Mike in Asheville: They don’t. If anything, those are Yugoslavian flags. The French flag has vertical blue, white, and red.

      Jan 18, 2013 at 5:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ncman
      ncman

      Wouldn’t clothes look better if the models looked like they were the least bit happy to be wearing them, by smiling? Although, after seeing these designs, I guess I can understand why they have those “looks” on their faces.

      Jan 18, 2013 at 5:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Charlie in Charge
      Charlie in Charge

      @ncman: No, it’s not a pageant.

      Jan 18, 2013 at 6:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • adam madam
      adam madam

      hideously ugly clothes, made for people with too much money, worn by models who would look angelic in anything. why people don’t burst out laughing at every model on the runway is beyond me.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 8:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dawster
      Dawster

      @adam madam: Simply put, it’s because it’s an art show displaying colors, patterns, textiles, and form displayed in a method a designer chooses to express himself while still holding to the basic principles of balance with cohesiveness many artists and writers struggle with in every art piece they create. Chances are no one else on the planet will wear these particular clothes – so they are not “made for” anyone… they are made to be shown.

      Your argument (pithy as it was) would be better suited for a ready-to-wear fashion show.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 10:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Scribe38
      Scribe38

      @ncman: Would you be happy wearing that crap?!? I think there was only one jacket that I would have been tempted to try on.

      Jan 19, 2013 at 11:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • adam madam
      adam madam

      @dawster: thanks, sincerely, for schooling me. eloquently, too.

      that still doesn’t explain why the clothes shown here are consistently, hideously ugly.

      hat-tip for the pithiness, though.

      Jan 21, 2013 at 9:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • heydavis
      heydavis

      Next year, they might as well resurrect the polyester “leisure suits” from the 1970’s. They couldn’t be any uglier than these absurd collections, and at least had plenty of pockets.

      Jan 23, 2013 at 11:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • MORE PHOTOS

    FOLLOW US
     




    GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.