Comments on: Mitt’s Questionable Definition of “Discrimination”

By: Gregg

Gregg — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:12:20 +0000

Bureaucrat’s not the right word, but whatever, it’s late.

By: Gregg

Gregg — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:10:39 +0000

You find a scheming spineless bureaucrat “hot”?

By: JD

JD — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:40:08 +0000

i have to say.. id fuck him too.. he has that sort of weird hot thing going on… i agree Daddy’s submissive little boy

By: Meeg

Meeg — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:00:44 +0000

What a dumbfuck. How can he support Employment Non-Discrimination at the state level but not on the federal level. There’s no possible legitimate reason here, he’s clearly just pandering to bigots who are against protecting queer people from employment discrimination.

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:44:53 +0000

I don’t like him but apparently according to a local news media quiz I am suppose to vote for him because I agree with him on a few issues.

By: todd

todd — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:41:12 +0000

This whore will do or say anything to pander for votes. He is a total Fraud. He is a disgrace to his father’s good name. He is the true Flip-Flop king, not Kerry.

By: Danny the Tranny

Danny the Tranny — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:40:20 +0000

What an asshole.

By: K. Price

K. Price — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:11:10 +0000

What is it that you need federal protection from? Why would you want the federal government to be so deeply involved in your personal life choices? Mitt Romney says God does not discriminate. You might notice that Mitt does not claim to be God and therefore may or may not have some feelings of discrimination. Are you implying that you as a Gay person have no discriminations? Why don’t you reevaluate your own standings before trying to spin the words of an honest man in an attempt to trap him to forward your own agenda. Go Mitt.

By: Daddy's Submissive Little Boy

Daddy's Submissive Little Boy — Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:00:17 +0000

I’d fuck him (Mitt, or any of his sons)… but I’d never vote for him.