It would seem designers are finally catching up with thrifty fashionistas, which explains the New York Times‘ piece on cut-offs today.
While we’re not about to shell out $130 for pre-cut pants, we whole-heartedly agree with a reader’s summation of photographer Dean Isidro’s accompanying slide show, “Who’s the smoldering model?… I’m going to be thinking dirty things all day today…” We could spend all morning on those calves along!
Alan down in Florida
Just because they don’t go below the knees doesn’t qualify these as cut offs – especially with hemmed bottoms.
Nevertheless where can we get bigger and more pictures of the guys shown?
PJ
The fact that they are unhemmed makes them cutoffs. None of these shorts are hemmed but they will get raggedy as they get washed. Cutoffs always look nice and clean when they are first cut.
But I agree with Alan Down in Florida, I would love to see more of this model.
paul
I’m the reader in question here, guys…
Oh, Lord… Your discussion of the definition of cutoffs is RUINING all of my beautiful, filthy daydreams!
Stop and just look at how delicious he is… How on Earth can you fuss over clothing? I’m still in heaven.
paul
?
Brandon
dont try to understand AC paul, he is a spammer