Model War! outhotcover2.jpg

← Back to the post

Model War!

Add a comment

« Prev1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »

← Back to the post

What do you think of this post?

LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)

By: Andrew Belonksy
On: May 2, 2008
Tagged: Gay, Gossip, Media, Models, Out, Queerty

15 Comments

No. 1 · jesse
Boring

May 2, 2008 at 9:54 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 2 · Hells kitchen guy
They guy on the left looks like he has a birth defect. Is this all that OUT can do? I know that they are having troubles with money and that the bail-out is supposed to help, but using this tired stock art is so two years ago.

May 2, 2008 at 10:00 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 3 · Daddy
I like some of the young boys in there, but I love under 18 boys. I am glad that OUT has turned into an underage mag – perfect for we who lick our chops for the teens.

May 2, 2008 at 10:02 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 4 · Z.
Balck guys is HOT!
http://www.ilovezeren.com

May 2, 2008 at 10:15 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 5 · hells kitchen guy
Nice to see OUT taking the high road.

May 2, 2008 at 10:31 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 6 · seitan-on-a-stick · Member · 1138 comments
Remember when Out was relevant?

May 2, 2008 at 11:31 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 7 · ChristopherM · Member · 268 comments
I do, Seitan. It was before the owners of The Advocate bought them and turned them into Details for out gays (as opposed to the closeted ones who actually buy Details).

May 2, 2008 at 11:39 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 8 · HipBoy
Is OUT still open? I heard that they went bankrupt. Who do they think they are with that cover? LOL

May 2, 2008 at 12:03 pm · @Reply · Flag
No. 9 · FireIsland
Great that they feature straight models. One of those guys is totallly homo-phobic, I have worked with him but he says that he will take Fag money. What a total creep. Does out even care that it offends all of its readers? So many of its readers did not realize they were getting a free subscription to OUT just for signing onto gay.com to pop a nut or get laid — it just came when we signed up. I got to jack off and get a free mag – thanks OUT

May 2, 2008 at 12:05 pm · @Reply · Flag
No. 10 · MissionImpossible
The question FireI is – do the advertisers know that they are advertising to a bunch of trolls who got online to jack off – not read about fashions they’ll never wear.

May 2, 2008 at 12:07 pm · @Reply · Flag
No. 11 · Alan down in Florida
Forget the dudes – is that what we call fashion? It looks like 1870′s cricket locker room wear. Who would be caught dead wearing that crap in public?

May 2, 2008 at 1:41 pm · @Reply · Flag
No. 12 · PubBro
Queerty has such a biting edge to it – accept for when it is kissing OUT Magazine’s ass — with Andrew holding his breath in hopes of being considered for editorial. This coverage has not integrity.

May 2, 2008 at 2:20 pm · @Reply · Flag
No. 13 · Eminent Victorian · Member · 314 comments
Casting my vote for “None of the Above.” These pictures are pretty lame.

May 2, 2008 at 10:37 pm · @Reply · Flag
No. 14 · KB
There is nothing particularly special about either the models or the photographs. Bleh…

May 3, 2008 at 2:50 am · @Reply · Flag
No. 15 · JBD
Cast my vote for boring, too. They’re trying to bring back the 90′s or something. OUT shouldn’t try to be GQ or even Details.

May 4, 2008 at 1:40 am · @Reply · Flag