Back to the post
Back to the post
Morning Goods: Joe Lazo
Back to the post
20 Comments
No. 3 ·
PolishBear · Member · 19 comments
“Don’t you wish you could have a nice relaxing day with model Joe Lazo?”
Uh, NO. He looks like he’s thrown up everything he’s ever eaten. And I doubt he could carry on a marginally intelligent conversation to save his life.
Jan 31, 2008 at 10:26 am · @Reply
· Flag
· Flag
No. 7 ·
PolishBear · Member · 19 comments
DEAR GAY AS LIFE:
Judgmental? Only as far as my own tastes go. It’s unfortunate that the staff of QUEERTY think that only rail-thin, pouting models are attractive. You can have him.
Jan 31, 2008 at 12:10 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
No. 9 ·
ninebone · Member · 27 comments
If I wanted to ogle a mannequin I would go to my local department store. Can’t your photographers find some models with ‘life’ in them, maybe a smile or three and a twinkle in their eyes.
While I prefer guys on the slim side of physique, I will take a pass on this young mannequin.
Jan 31, 2008 at 1:21 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
No. 11 ·
PolishBear · Member · 19 comments
DEAR GARY:
I wasn’t going to use the term “twink,” but now that you mention it …
Jan 31, 2008 at 1:43 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
No. 13 ·
PolishBear · Member · 19 comments
“If you want some hairy, stinky fat man, there are plenty of sites that spcialize in that sort of thing.”
I’m not sure what the “stinky” is in reference to … but in any case, YES INDEED, there are plenty of websites that specialize in all different tastes. But this begs the question: What sort of website is QUEERTY? I like the fact that a wide variety of political and cultural issues are touched on, issues that ALL LGBT people can take interest in.
But then there’s “Morning Goods,” which so far seems to make very young, skinny men some kind of Gay aesthetic ideal. I can imagine the QUEERTY staff squealing over their latest waif, saying “Oooohhh, he’s HAWT …” but it seems to me that they’ll be ignoring a good part of their potential audience.
Just my thoughts. “Out” and “Advocate” fall into the same trap.
Jan 31, 2008 at 2:44 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
No. 15 ·
Dawster · Member · 592 comments
i know, Ken… how narrow-minded can people be? it’s not a “gay aesthetic”, it’s a MALE aesthetic… something that many straight women can appreciate as well.
the fact that you, PolishBear, are different and see something else as attractive doesn’t mean you have to go out of your way to belittle, condemn, and scorn people who appreciate a healthy male body (whether we be gay men or straight women) who decides to take care of himself. your assumption that all people who are fit are unintelligent and worthless only proves that your overexerted sense of superiority has blinded you from seeing people for who they really are.
some might say you were jealous, others would say bitter… maybe it’s both. either way, extending such a firm opinion is certainly your right as a person… albeit far from emotionally or mentally healthy in our society.
Jan 31, 2008 at 3:00 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
No. 17 ·
hells kitchen guy
Ok, I shouldn’t have said “stinky” – low blow. Sorry, But still … there ARE sites for guys that have bellies, etc. Mr. PolishBear, whether you like it or not, there is an aesthetic that governs the vast majority of how gay men and straight women (and straight men, for that matter. And lesbians) view attractive men.
1) definition – low body fat
2) size – muscle mass
3) body hair – either trimmed (manscaped) or none
That’s just the way it is.
Jan 31, 2008 at 9:17 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
No. 20 ·
Jane D.
This guy is super hot in person!!! I’m a heterosexual female and I took an abs class he instructs at David Barton gym in Chelsea. I don’t know if he’s straight or gay, I just know that I’m crushing on him super hard, (crushing enough to google stalk him), and I can’t take his class anymore because I find myself giggling waayyy toooo much! <3 What I would give for one night with his fine ass!
Jan 1, 2012 at 8:03 pm · @Reply · Flag
· Flag
Add your Comment
Ogled and objectified. Check.