Morning Goods: Luigi
 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Morning Goods is curated by The Photo Project NYC. For information on participating, contact them here.

 
 
Fark Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (28)

No. 1 · tavdy79

Queerty, I quite the new look in general – but the new look photospreads? Not so good. Any chance you could change them back?

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 8:06 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Mike

This is annoying, why do I have to click to a new page for each picture? What happened to thumbnails?

There are tons of gay blogs with good pictures. I might just stop looking at this one.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 8:09 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Mark

Very cute!

Nice legs!

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 8:17 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 4 · MR

You know, normally the whining about the site format bores me, but I have to jump in on this one. I can't be bothered with these photo entries anymore.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 8:22 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Justin

would really like to see the old format (thumbnails for pictures) back in place. This format is frustrating. :-( Love the site! :-)

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 8:29 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Gurlene

Though this one doesn't come close to being as sickening as the twins that were featured in last weeks photos I stopped at page 3 after realizing what is the point/why the hell don't I get a life here and move on.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 8:30 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 7 · STLB

Thumbnails please. This is very annoying and time consuming, especially at work!! LOL.

Love the site though.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 9:09 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 8 · hardmannyc

Trust me, you're not missing anything. I did two other pages. This guy defines "average looking." Certainly not unattractive but not worth time on the Net.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 9:59 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 9 · dvlaries

Not only is the lack of thumbs cumbersome, we're back to 269×404-postage stamp size shots. Maybe this is a calculated first strategy to get rid of the feature: make it so annoying that people won't miss it or complain when you yank it.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 10:18 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 10 · Ant

the new format is so that queerty can increase their "click" percentages. It's how the derive advertising dollars – by how many average clicks they get. Driving that up allows them to gain more advertising. it's not rocket science – but it does suck

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 10:38 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 11 · zack

This new photo layout is annoying. People want their thumbnails back.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 10:45 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Rich

Please go back to the thumbnails this new format is a pain.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 11:40 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 13 · EPH

I disagree — the new format is much more user friendly, and (I think) a step in the right direction. Ideally Queerty would follow Jalopnik's photo format, both having thumbnails and the ability to click through, but since most of us are going to look at the larger versions of the pictures anyway, it doesn't hurt to have them more easily accessible.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 12:00 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 14 · Pragmatist

DAMN. Perhaps my favorite of all the guys who've been posted on this site (though the champagne guy ranks a close second). Awesome.

Queerty shouldn't give itself too big a pat on the back for jettisoning the so-called "models," though. This guy is certainly as good or better than many guys who successfully earn a living off their looks. Still, great find. Thanks!

Oh yeah: I despise the new image layout. I have completely given up on viewing this blog on my mobile device — pity, because it used to be a favorite pastime during my downtime. Who has time to reload this entire bloated page just to find out what the next image looks like?

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 2:01 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 15 · David

It took me less than 2 mins to look at all 15 images. I really like the new image layout. Thanks Queerty!

As for the model, don't like him.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 2:13 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 16 · vernonvanderbilt

Not bad. Above average for a Morning Goods selection.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 3:55 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 17 · Z reveals

Amazing body!

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 4:45 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 18 · Matt

Guy is gorgeous. Don't mind the format.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 5:09 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 19 · Yikes!

I agree! Bring back the thumbnails, BUT make them bigger if you will.

Love this site, but it gets annoying and very time consuming having to click the 'next' button only to find a pic you really didn't expect or want to see in the first place.

tanks!

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 5:31 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 20 · Suburban

I have to say the same…bring back the thumbnails, please. About Luigi, not bad, I like the chest hair. I did ask about waxing the other day but I never got an answer.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 5:48 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 21 · Aaron J.

Great looking guy.

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 6:02 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 22 · sal

like new format…..italiano si

Posted: Mar 30, 2009 at 9:47 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 23 · bdyn

THUMBNAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Mar 31, 2009 at 12:26 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 24 · rogue dandelion

this guy is humble pie. i pass 20 guys on the street each morning that are hotter.

Posted: Mar 31, 2009 at 1:44 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 25 · Monica Roberts

WHAT A DISTRAction!

We have FAT Black Lesbians sitting on They Couch, thumbing through they probation date calenders..

and within 5 hours out of "Lock Up".. them Afro-Bulldegreengs will do … WHAT?

a) look for a wife

b) look for a girlfriend

c) look for a excuse to be a "victim" and blame a "web page.."

LOL

Posted: Mar 31, 2009 at 2:55 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 26 · getreal

@Monica Roberts: Are you insane because your posts never make sense. EVER.

Posted: Mar 31, 2009 at 3:30 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 27 · TikiHead

This guy's really sweet!

I have only one comment about the photo presentation: Can 'Previous/Next 1 2 3 4…' be above the photo as well as below?

Just a thought!

Posted: Apr 1, 2009 at 2:09 pm · @Reply · [Flag?]
No. 28 · bigjake75

ok…did the photographer ever think of shaving the kids unibrow? jesus…not that I would kick him out of bed for it…

Posted: Apr 2, 2009 at 2:19 am · @Reply · [Flag?]
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

By posting, you agree to our Comments Policy.

 
 
Scroll Posts
Queerty Home | Advertise | Copyright 2010 Jossip Initiatives