Comments on: Morning Goods: Luigi

By: bigjake75

bigjake75 — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:19:23 +0000

ok…did the photographer ever think of shaving the kids unibrow? jesus…not that I would kick him out of bed for it…

By: TikiHead

TikiHead — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:09:39 +0000

This guy’s really sweet!

I have only one comment about the photo presentation: Can ‘Previous/Next 1 2 3 4…’ be above the photo as well as below?

Just a thought!

By: getreal

getreal — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:30:12 +0000

@Monica Roberts: Are you insane because your posts never make sense. EVER.

By: Monica Roberts

Monica Roberts — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:55:15 +0000

WHAT A DISTRAction!

We have FAT Black Lesbians sitting on They Couch, thumbing through they probation date calenders..

and within 5 hours out of “Lock Up”.. them Afro-Bulldegreengs will do … WHAT?

a) look for a wife

b) look for a girlfriend

c) look for a excuse to be a “victim” and blame a “web page..”

LOL

By: rogue dandelion

rogue dandelion — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 05:44:50 +0000

this guy is humble pie. i pass 20 guys on the street each morning that are hotter.

By: bdyn

bdyn — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:26:07 +0000

THUMBNAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: sal

sal — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:47:37 +0000

like new format…..italiano si

By: Aaron J.

Aaron J. — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:02:12 +0000

Great looking guy.

By: Suburban

Suburban — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:48:28 +0000

I have to say the same…bring back the thumbnails, please. About Luigi, not bad, I like the chest hair. I did ask about waxing the other day but I never got an answer.

By: Yikes!

Yikes! — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:31:32 +0000

I agree! Bring back the thumbnails, BUT make them bigger if you will.

Love this site, but it gets annoying and very time consuming having to click the ‘next’ button only to find a pic you really didn’t expect or want to see in the first place.

tanks!

By: Matt

Matt — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:09:27 +0000

Guy is gorgeous. Don’t mind the format.

By: Z reveals

Z reveals — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:45:58 +0000

Amazing body!

By: vernonvanderbilt

vernonvanderbilt — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:55:58 +0000

Not bad. Above average for a Morning Goods selection.

By: David

David — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:13:08 +0000

It took me less than 2 mins to look at all 15 images. I really like the new image layout. Thanks Queerty!

As for the model, don’t like him.

By: Pragmatist

Pragmatist — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:01:16 +0000

DAMN. Perhaps my favorite of all the guys who’ve been posted on this site (though the champagne guy ranks a close second). Awesome.

Queerty shouldn’t give itself too big a pat on the back for jettisoning the so-called “models,” though. This guy is certainly as good or better than many guys who successfully earn a living off their looks. Still, great find. Thanks!

Oh yeah: I despise the new image layout. I have completely given up on viewing this blog on my mobile device — pity, because it used to be a favorite pastime during my downtime. Who has time to reload this entire bloated page just to find out what the next image looks like?

By: EPH

EPH — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:00:00 +0000

I disagree — the new format is much more user friendly, and (I think) a step in the right direction. Ideally Queerty would follow Jalopnik’s photo format, both having thumbnails and the ability to click through, but since most of us are going to look at the larger versions of the pictures anyway, it doesn’t hurt to have them more easily accessible.

By: Rich

Rich — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:40:56 +0000

Please go back to the thumbnails this new format is a pain.

By: zack

zack — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:45:52 +0000

This new photo layout is annoying. People want their thumbnails back.

By: Ant

Ant — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:38:17 +0000

the new format is so that queerty can increase their “click” percentages. It’s how the derive advertising dollars – by how many average clicks they get. Driving that up allows them to gain more advertising. it’s not rocket science – but it does suck

By: dvlaries

dvlaries — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:18:06 +0000

Not only is the lack of thumbs cumbersome, we’re back to 269×404-postage stamp size shots. Maybe this is a calculated first strategy to get rid of the feature: make it so annoying that people won’t miss it or complain when you yank it.

By: hardmannyc

hardmannyc — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:59:00 +0000

Trust me, you’re not missing anything. I did two other pages. This guy defines “average looking.” Certainly not unattractive but not worth time on the Net.

By: STLB

STLB — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:09:53 +0000

Thumbnails please. This is very annoying and time consuming, especially at work!! LOL.

Love the site though.

By: Gurlene

Gurlene — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:30:46 +0000

Though this one doesn’t come close to being as sickening as the twins that were featured in last weeks photos I stopped at page 3 after realizing what is the point/why the hell don’t I get a life here and move on.

By: Justin

Justin — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:29:59 +0000

would really like to see the old format (thumbnails for pictures) back in place. This format is frustrating. :-( Love the site! :-)

By: MR

MR — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:22:24 +0000

You know, normally the whining about the site format bores me, but I have to jump in on this one. I can’t be bothered with these photo entries anymore.

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:17:08 +0000

Very cute!

Nice legs!

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:09:10 +0000

This is annoying, why do I have to click to a new page for each picture? What happened to thumbnails?

There are tons of gay blogs with good pictures. I might just stop looking at this one.

By: tavdy79

tavdy79 — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:06:31 +0000

Queerty, I quite the new look in general – but the new look photospreads? Not so good. Any chance you could change them back?