No-one could love him as much as he loves himself.
· Flag
My no-heavy-lifting standard, before I send my fellow message board posters to see ‘the new one’ is: 1) Would Brian Kinney do him; 2) Would I watch Brian Kinney do him? So this guy gets a pass, since we’ve seen far worse things leave that fictional character’s loft. But Nigel IS as vacant as queerty can routinely find them.
· Flag
I’m glad about today’s Morning Goods ’cause I’m sure Rowen will like him. Personally though, he does nothing for me…less than nothing acutally. If it’s possible to get negative wood, then I have it. I’d rather do John McCain and Betty White in a threesome after dinner at a T.G.I. Friday’s in Iraq and I really don’t wanna do that!
· Flag
More Puerto Rican Morning Goods! (I won’t stop asking til it happens so the editors might as well do it…)
· Flag
Would somebody please tell me what is less than perfect about this guy?
Don’t blame the model for the look. In case you haven’t watched any of the reality TV modeling shows that blank look is one that photographers want so that the viewers can project whatever they desire onto the models.
Also how do we know he is Puerto Rican?
Finally, how sophomoric of all of us to assume that brains and beauty are mutually exclusive.
· Flag
Is he wearing eye makeup? Yuk! He does nothing for me.
· Flag
He puts me in mind of the actor/musician Rick Nelson.
He has a strong jawline with a small mouth, that unsmiling looks “pouty” :(
In the ‘white pants’ photo he begins to give us a smile, a hint of the inner man. ;)
He has a nice body, very well proportioned. :)
Based upon the photos I would put him in the ‘Friend’ category instead of the ‘Lover’ category.
· Flag
Hey I’m a fittness model and I’m lookin to have a good time on a video if your interested hit me up at Model2916@yahoo.com.By the way i’m hotter then this guy i’ll be hear from you guys thanks..
· Flag
twenty six posts so far, something about this beauty is hitting home with you guys, some comments show a little green monster peeping out of some egos. I for one am going out now to go burka shopping, the only way I will go out after the overload of ***** star beauties this week.
(and a day to go)
· Flag
models arent really supposed to smile always…it depends on the photographer… Sexy dosent involve smiling… and yea he probbly loves himself way more than any of us could… maaaabey if we put all of our love together… we could get him enmasse!?
· Flag
He’s not beautiful…if you’re going by face (which I do). But then again these things are in the eye of the beholder. Give me a tatooed hood or wannabe over these blow-dried dickless wonders any day of the week.
No one is taking up model2916 on his offer to sell himself like he was Eliot Spitzer’s bitch? I feel kinda sad that he has to drum up business this way…look at what this horrible economy is doing to our whores! Where’s their bail out?
· Flag
You-re a lucky guy! Good to hear he’s good in the bedroom, do you know if he’s any good in the bathroom too? As I need some tiling?
Also any idea how much time and effort he puts to looking that optimal? As it looks like a good excerise plan to follow?
· Flag
He is beautiful, has an amazing smooth body with great proportions and world-class pecs. And there are certainly no reasons to assume anything about his intelligence just based on the photos. This comment thread is full of a–holes. I’m not into the hairy rough look, but I don’t feel the need to put all of the guys in that category down whenever they show up. I think gay guys like to trash pretty boys in order to feel macho or something.
· Flag
13 AUG 2011
In the past few months, while finding and saving photos of males, I have occasionally read comments on blogs about male models. I just read (and saved) comments (posted 20 MAR 2008) on queerty re Nigel Paschini. When I saw the first photo of Nigel, I was puzzled because his face appeared vacant. In most of the next 25 photos of Nigel, I found the same. He’s handsome, but his face seems vacant. I understand that photographers will direct models to look certain ways, and I accept that. But I think that photographers are mistaken to think that vacant, unsmiling faces are appealing. I would think that the vast majority of male models are happy with their physiques – in the sense that they are willing to be photographed for more than their faces, more than their ability to pose in certain ways, and more than their ability to wear clothes. If they are happy, the photographer – unless he is shooting a certain mood – should have the model smile. The smile doesn’t have to be a blinding grin, just a natural smile of personal happiness. When I look at a photo of another male, my primary question is, would I feel happy if I were this man? If I had the kind of physique which most male models have, I want to think that I would feel immensely happy and would have a big smile on my face most of the time. The smile would reflect my fundamental feeling of love for my body.
Some of the comments on the queerty post seemed to assume that Nigel chose the face which Nature gave him. I have to wonder about the faces of the men who posted such comments. Obviously, every man has his own idea about what constitutes handsomeness. (I would guess that this is especially true of gay men.) But no man chose the face which Nature gave him, and there will always be disagreement about whether a particular man is handsome. I think that it is more important to consider whether a male model is taking good care of his body. Also, consider that something which cannot be found in any photo is the character of the man. Is he a shmuck, or is he a genuinely nice person?
If I were Nigel Paschini, I would think that I’m handsome.
· Flag
How come Queety doesn’t like this guy? He’s gorgeous! Especially in that blue Armani piece!