<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NH Paper Won&#8217;t Vote Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/nh-paper-wont-vote-romney-20071226/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/nh-paper-wont-vote-romney-20071226/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:22:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hisurfer</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/nh-paper-wont-vote-romney-20071226/#comment-34328</link>
		<dc:creator>hisurfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/news/nh-paper-wont-vote-romney-20071226/#comment-34328</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a difference between being &#039;phony&#039; and moderating your views for the media and the electorate.  No politician - shoots, no professional outside artists &amp; actors - can blurt out what&#039;s really on their mind at work.  You learn how to phrase things properly. 
So I really don&#039;t agree that all these guys are phony per se. Romney, of course, is ... his beliefs seem to be based on the latest polls. Huckabee, obviously. I&#039;d add Ron Paul to the list of fakes - he&#039;s only a &#039;libertarian&#039; when it comes to right wing causes. Giuliani and McCain? I don&#039;t know if they&#039;re phony or if they&#039;ve just sold their souls to the devil. 

Hillary is overly managed and controlled, and Obama isn&#039;t the political innocent his campaign likes to pretend he is, but neither, I think, is phony. I do believe, in the end, that we&#039;re getting a good sense of who they are.  Biden (whom I&#039;ve met), Dodd, and Richardson are all pretty much the same men on the campaign trail as off, for better or worse. Edwards is really the only major Dem right who I can&#039;t quite figure out.


As for the rest? It&#039;s easy to be brutally honest when you&#039;re on the D List. Just ask Kathy Griffin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a difference between being &#8216;phony&#8217; and moderating your views for the media and the electorate.  No politician &#8211; shoots, no professional outside artists &amp; actors &#8211; can blurt out what&#8217;s really on their mind at work.  You learn how to phrase things properly.<br />
So I really don&#8217;t agree that all these guys are phony per se. Romney, of course, is &#8230; his beliefs seem to be based on the latest polls. Huckabee, obviously. I&#8217;d add Ron Paul to the list of fakes &#8211; he&#8217;s only a &#8216;libertarian&#8217; when it comes to right wing causes. Giuliani and McCain? I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re phony or if they&#8217;ve just sold their souls to the devil. </p>
<p>Hillary is overly managed and controlled, and Obama isn&#8217;t the political innocent his campaign likes to pretend he is, but neither, I think, is phony. I do believe, in the end, that we&#8217;re getting a good sense of who they are.  Biden (whom I&#8217;ve met), Dodd, and Richardson are all pretty much the same men on the campaign trail as off, for better or worse. Edwards is really the only major Dem right who I can&#8217;t quite figure out.</p>
<p>As for the rest? It&#8217;s easy to be brutally honest when you&#8217;re on the D List. Just ask Kathy Griffin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProfessorVP</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/nh-paper-wont-vote-romney-20071226/#comment-34321</link>
		<dc:creator>ProfessorVP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/news/nh-paper-wont-vote-romney-20071226/#comment-34321</guid>
		<description>Except- in varying degrees- for Kucinich, Gravel and Paul, which candidate ISN&#039;T a complete phony?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except- in varying degrees- for Kucinich, Gravel and Paul, which candidate ISN&#8217;T a complete phony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

