<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;No Gay Endorsement&#8221; Says Singaporean Pol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.queerty.com/no-gay-endorsement-says-singaporean-pol-20071023/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.queerty.com/no-gay-endorsement-says-singaporean-pol-20071023/</link>
	<description>Free of an agenda. Except that gay one.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:08:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rt. Rev. Dr. RES</title>
		<link>http://www.queerty.com/no-gay-endorsement-says-singaporean-pol-20071023/#comment-22669</link>
		<dc:creator>Rt. Rev. Dr. RES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.queerty.com/news/no-gay-endorsement-says-singaporean-pol-20071023/#comment-22669</guid>
		<description>This very statement by Ho Peng Kee could well have been uttered by Josef Ratzinger aka Benedictus PPXVI.

The word &quot;lifestyle &quot; when the proper scientific terminology is &quot;psychosexual orientation&quot; reminds one that the definition is tainted, unscientific and yes theocratic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This very statement by Ho Peng Kee could well have been uttered by Josef Ratzinger aka Benedictus PPXVI.</p>
<p>The word &#8220;lifestyle &#8221; when the proper scientific terminology is &#8220;psychosexual orientation&#8221; reminds one that the definition is tainted, unscientific and yes theocratic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

