EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!

George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her.

“In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. . . . Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide” (blog of drizzten).

“One of those ‘very leasts’ [was] George Bush’s personal complicity in the death (murder to be precise) of my friend Margie Schoedinger in September of 2003. Determining the exact whereabouts and contacts of [then] president-elect George Bush on September 21 thru 22, 2003, should be entirely lacking in difficulty” (Leola McConnell (Nevada Progressive Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010)).

Leola McConnell is correct: Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Margie Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder.

BEWARE: If the president of the United States hates one—for whatever reasons—he can continuously criminally stalk one to the point that one cannot get away from it, and one ultimately commits suicide in desperation to escape. He can murder people in this way.

Bush is getting away with his murder of Margie Schoedinger—with no sheriff, prosecutor, or court willing to uphold the rule of law.

Bush’s method of murdering Margie Schoedinger cannot exist in a vacuum: he must have murdered other people in the same way.

Bush should confess, come out with the names of all of the people whom he murdered in the disgusting way he murdered Margie Schoedinger, undergo execution, and accordingly find himself at the intersection where he would be free.

(There are thousands of copies of the information above on the Internet. It exists very extensively in all major search engines. Please feel free to go to any major search engine, type “George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her,” hit “Enter,” and find innumerable results.)
_______________
Andrew Y. Wang
(a.k.a. “THE DISSEMINATING MACHINE”)
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

The problem isn’t that she hasn’t had a hard life, it is that someone that is in the law profession for as long as she has been should be able to pick her words VERY carefully before saying them in public. All she had to say is, “because of where I’ve come from as a Latina woman I find that I have a unique perspective,” and if she would have left it at that, no one would be calling her a racist or wanting to burn her in effigy.

Also, another thing I will never get, why is it that AIDS is always considered a gay issue. AIDS IS NOT A GAY ISSUE!!! AIDS is a stupidity issue in this country. If you want to sleep with everything that moves and 9/10 times not even use protection (because we all know bare back is better) then don’t be shocked when you get AIDS, and don’t expect us to mourn you or support you when your own stupidity led to your tragedy.

None. Not one.

Try again.

If Lawrence v. Texas came to the new Bush/Obama court there can be no doubt that Scalia’s hateful bigoted words would have been the majority opinion. There would still be sodomy laws in the United States.

McCain would NEVER have been to snek a sixth Catholic onto the Supreme court. Those of you who insisted that we HAD to vote for Obama for the Supreme Court have been made utter fools of. In this case, there is no doubt gay people would have been better off with McCain choosing the justices.

Yeah Dennis try telling a Hispanic Gay person that Sotomayor is a plant and see what happens. I bet you won’t.

I know the “Obots” won’t beleive it, but who cares what they think…they just go “waaah” whenever anybody says anything bad about their “chocolate Jesus”…

Just because they’re gay or lesbian doesn’t NECESSARILY mean they’ll support us from the bench!

http://www.lulu.com/content/pa.....d-/7182389

Apart from that it is very hard to find

Right. I’m sure the circle jerk political debates within the fringe left movement are interesting during your late night cafe chats. If being indifferent to your failed ideological enterprise is being clueless, just call me Silverstone.

Right centrist politics makes for strange bedfellows. You wouldn’t know a Stalinist if you bedded one, and since the CP practically dissolved itself into the right centrist Democrat party decades ago (yes, they are that right wing) that’s probably happened more than once.

Clueless you.

Cheers.

No Republicans I know genuinely think she’s either a lesbian or a strong supporter of homosexual rights, however. Heck, she’s a Latina (they generally hate homosexuals) and a Catholic (same, except when it comes to their pedophile priests abusing children). How can she be pro-gay?

With Democrats like these who needs Republicans.

quote:
He said Sotomayor, currently a judge on Second Circuit Court of Appeals, was “very qualified” but said that “for Christians, it will be bad.”

“She’s a very liberal person, and she will support a liberal agenda,” he said
:unquote

so this may be good news…after all Diaz is a Puerto Rican also from the Bronx and should know Sotomayor well enough within the circles of NY politics and law.

http://www.politickerny.com/37.....-sotomayor

Recent studies show that a higher percentage of Catholics are pro-choice (abortion) than evangelical christians.

I would expect similar numbers on gay rights issues as well.

Coming from a catholic background does not necessarily mean one is closed-minded. If anyting, it is a faith that has had to bend and stretch to fit different cultures a bit more than U.S. Evangelism.