Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
Back to the post

NYC Pride Will Allow Hate Group To March In “Parade” With Anti-Gay Banner

rainbow-balloons-nyc-gay-pride-parade (1)


Back to the post
By:           Matthew Tharrett
On:           Mar 21, 2014
Tagged: , , ,
  • 25 Comments
    • Desert Boy
      Desert Boy

      Well isn’t this just political correctness taken to the point of insanity.

      Maybe the next Purim or Passover parade will allow an anti-Semitic skinhead group to join them?

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Icebloo
      Icebloo

      I think it’s a great idea to let the haters into the parade. I think they will be very scared marching in front of all those gays shouting abuse at them. It will give them a taste of what we have had to endure for years.
      Let’s see if this hate group actually participates or if they pull out of the event at the last minute.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DonW
      DonW

      Of course they should be allowed in — they’re all queers too, albeit self-hating ones.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • SteveDenver
      SteveDenver

      I think I’m going to apply for a street vendor permit and sell PIES. Something really creamy and sticky… sounds like a date to me!

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • macmantoo
      macmantoo

      I don’t trust them. I think they’ll pull out at the last minute and claim the Organization threatened them. Or they’ll invite a bunch of skinheads to join them.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • TrickyPuck
      TrickyPuck

      I think it is a good decision to let them in, especially after the LGBT exclusion at St. Patrick’s day parades. It shows that we can take the high road.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dougmc92
      dougmc92

      he was just looking to call us hypocrits- he would have found some reason to back out- the coward!

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • hephaestion
      hephaestion

      We should all throw strands of beads at them as they pass by. I did that to some haters in the pride parade crowd once and it blew their minds. They kinda wanted to pick up the beads and it was hilarious seeing them wrestle with whether or not to pick up the gay beads being repeatedly tossed at them.

      It was kind of like throwing love at them, and it blew their minds.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 6:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ridpathos
      Ridpathos

      I think it’s a great idea. Welcome everyone. Let them avoid the tomatoes if they can.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 7:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Desert Boy
      Desert Boy

      I just heard via a phone call that hate group leader Bill Donahue threw a major hissy fit and backed out. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Guess he was afraid he would be pelted with raw eggs.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 8:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Evji108
      Evji108

      They called his bluff and the dude totally chickened out. Too funny. What a lame jerk.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 10:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ruhlmann
      Ruhlmann

      He’s in but he has to wear the assless chaps.

      Mar 21, 2014 at 10:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Caleb in SC
      Caleb in SC

      @Ruhlmann: I just vomited in my mouth a little. Have you seen this guy?

      Mar 21, 2014 at 11:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • misterhollywood
      misterhollywood

      Let them into the parade – it only high-lights the bigotry! Now that Matt Bomer appears to be out of a job since White Collar is getting cancelled, maybe he can be the Parade Lead?

      (Our story on Bomer’s show getting cancelled is on our site. Click on my name to access).

      Mar 21, 2014 at 11:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Harley
      Harley

      No matter what the pride organization does, the wing nuts will fine fault in something. It’s a better not to play into them. Let them march. We are better then they are and everyone knows it. Jesus ran around with twelve men and a prostitute. He was more like us then them.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 7:03 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • DarkZephyr
      DarkZephyr

      I don’t understand why Queerty is reporting this as an attempt by the NYC parade organizers for press. That isn’t what it is at all. As other posters have commented, they were calling Donahue’s bluff. Also showing that we LGBT people aren’t as closed minded as he is. Jesus Queerty.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 8:48 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • enfilmigult
      enfilmigult

      What is this

      Mar 22, 2014 at 9:20 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • enfilmigult
      enfilmigult

      Sorry, ignore that comment fragment. It was SUPPOSED to say:

      What is this writeup? I was expecting glee over the parade calling his bluff—he was so obviously doing it so he could release a “see, they rejected us” statement after getting rejected, it’s hilarious that they said “sure, come on over.” But apparently the writer thinks…what, it was a grab for publicity combined with capitulation to the Catholic League? Sheesh. No offense but think a little harder about this stuff.

      I’m not disappointed he backed out—also hilarious—but I am that he managed to find a flimsy excuse to accuse them of hypocrisy anyway, since that was what he was aiming for the entire time. Here’s hoping they release a nice long statement detailing that these information sessions contained such juicy gay training material as “show up on this street at 9:00 am.”

      Mar 22, 2014 at 9:26 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Desert Boy
      Desert Boy

      The Catholic League’s Bill Donahue reportedly didn’t want to attend “gay training” – which means means sensitivity training mandated for all entrants.

      Let this be a wake-up call for the silly queens in charge of NYC Pride.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 9:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • enfilmigult
      enfilmigult

      @Desert Boy: A wake-up call saying what?

      Mar 22, 2014 at 10:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kieran
      Kieran

      If Hollywood casting directors had wanted to conjure up an arrogant, smug, loud-mouth homophobic gasbag as a representative for Catholics, they couldn’t have done better than real-life Bill Donohue.

      What damage this guy has done to the reputation of Catholics. No wonder the media loves to give him air time to portray Catholics as backward, narrow-minded and intolerant bigots. And for being the ugly face of Catholic homophobia in America, Donohue reportedly takes an estimated $400,000 annual salary from the Catholic League.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 10:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Matthew Tharrett
      Matthew Tharrett · Queerty Editor

      @Desert Boy: The “gay training” Donohue was referring to was not “sensitivity training,” as you say.

      It was a mandatory information session that one person from each participating organization was required to attend. Not all that uncommon for an event like this.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 10:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • HirsuteOne
      HirsuteOne

      Let him march. The banner was allegedly going to say “straight is great”/ Big deal. It’s of no consequence and allowing him to march only shows inclusivity and respect for freedom as opposed to his “ship ‘em all to an island” stance.

      Besides, he’s already backed out once he found out he would be allowed to march and thus couldn’t make a grand show about being rejected.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 1:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • kevininbuffalo
      kevininbuffalo

      Donahue = no balls.

      Mar 22, 2014 at 4:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Dawson
      Dawson

      It was right to include him and right to make him go to a training session if EVERYONE ELSE is required to. Bill didn’t like that we call him on his bluff. He had to find some way out. How cleaver (not!) how it called it a “gay training session” without even going to it to find out. So he is basically not telling the truth. What a good Catholic.

      So he is to be the exception and not required to follow the rules and then gets upset because he has to? He just tried to spin it his way when he found out we wouldn’t exclude him. Sorry Bill, we can see right through you and you just lost your argument didn’t you.

      So now what is he going to say? That we included him but he doesn’t believe in following the rules everyone else has to follow?

      Bill, you are still welcome but your lies are not.

      What a coward.

      Mar 27, 2014 at 12:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • MORE PHOTOS

    FOLLOW US
     




    GET THE DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.