Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  crime file

NY’s Joshua Holts Gets 4 Years In Jail For Bar Bashing, But No Hate Crime Attachment

After being found guilty of second-degree assault in July, Joshua Holts, 26, was today sentenced to four years in prison for attacking 47-year-old Scott Wright outside a bar near Buffalo in 2008, which left him requiring four surgeries to repair damage to his eye and face. Another procedure is scheduled for next month.

The entire episode was caught on surveillance tape and shows Holts viciously beating Wright.

Holts, who apologized in court for being too drunk during the attack, allegedly hurled anti-gay slurs at his victim the entire time, but Judge Thomas Franczyk didn’t believe there was enough concrete evidence to add a hate crime charge.

By:           Matt Debord
On:           Sep 29, 2010
Tagged: , , , ,
  • 7 Comments
    • No. 1 · Comixbear · Member · 64 comments

      Apparently there would only be enough evidence if the defendant stood up and yelled “Death to f*gs just like I tried that night!”

      Sep 29, 2010 at 9:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 2 · Kev C

      How did someone as stupid as Thomas Franczyk get to be a judge? He couldn’t judge his way out of a paper bag.

      Sep 29, 2010 at 9:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 3 · Aaron in Honolulu

      HOW THE FUCK IS THIS NOT A HATE CRIME??? He spew anti-gay slurs while he was beating the shit out of him. It’s even a miracle that they captured all this on tape and for the attacker to admit to his wrong doing. How much more fucking evidence does this judge need? and what a coward for his attacker to blame alcohol. Alcohol brings out the TRUTH!!!

      Sep 30, 2010 at 8:59 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 4 · Jaroslaw

      The story here says “allegedly” spewed anti-gay slurs…… the reaction here by posters 1 & 3 make it sound like it was proven. If so, why the word “allegedly”??

      Hey, do you want to go to court and get convicted by public opinion or proof?

      Sep 30, 2010 at 12:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 5 · Kev C

      @Jaroslaw: The Springville police were convinced that this was a hate crime, based on their interview with Holts and other info, and persued it as such. How often does that happen? For the judge to re-interpret Holts motives, to provide excuses, is acting as his defense not as a judge.

      Sep 30, 2010 at 2:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 6 · Jaroslaw

      Kev C – Like I said, it apparently wasn’t proven. Now, I’m not doubting that it was a hate crime, but presumably whatever the police presented was insufficient? Do we know the details of why that testimony/evidence was ignored?

      Frankly, I think four years is not much prison time for someone who beat the crap out of another person.

      Sep 30, 2010 at 3:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag
    • No. 7 · Jaroslaw

      (whether it was a hate crime or not)

      Sep 30, 2010 at 3:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · Flag

    Add your Comment




    It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


    Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.