http://www.queerty.com/oregonian-judges-not-feeling-anti-gay-movt-20080709/ Free of an agenda. Except that gay one. Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:17:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.queerty.com/oregonian-judges-not-feeling-anti-gay-movt-20080709/#comment-66101 Qjersey Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:30:34 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/oregonian-judges-not-feeling-anti-gay-movt-20080709/#comment-66101 well ajax, while you are correct, the republicrats have managed to convince the public and the media to buy their definitions of conservative and liberal. They did the same thing 50 years ago and convinced the public that socialist means the same thing as communist. well ajax, while you are correct, the republicrats have managed to convince the public and the media to buy their definitions of conservative and liberal. They did the same thing 50 years ago and convinced the public that socialist means the same thing as communist.

]]> http://www.queerty.com/oregonian-judges-not-feeling-anti-gay-movt-20080709/#comment-66100 ajax Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:11:03 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/oregonian-judges-not-feeling-anti-gay-movt-20080709/#comment-66100 May I make a suggestion, Queerty? By and large, the media incorrectly labels people and organizations who foster and support anti-gay legislation as "social conservatives". Conservatives actually believe legislation that impinges on individual freedom is bad and contrary to our Constitution. True conservatives wouldn't support the legislation these people and groups put foward. Can we please begin to refer to these people more correctly as "social reactionaries" or "social fundamentalists"? May I make a suggestion, Queerty? By and large, the media incorrectly labels people and organizations who foster and support anti-gay legislation as “social conservatives”. Conservatives actually believe legislation that impinges on individual freedom is bad and contrary to our Constitution. True conservatives wouldn’t support the legislation these people and groups put foward. Can we please begin to refer to these people more correctly as “social reactionaries” or “social fundamentalists”?

]]>