Out Politico Jason Bartlett Opens Up
 
Page: 1 2
 

hillsheart.jpg
Bartlett describes Hillary Clinton as "his girl," and worries that Obama's nothing but hot air.
AB: An Obama supporter recently said one of his main problems with Clinton is that she wants to leave parts of DOMA in place. Where do you stand on that?

JB: What I don't like about Barack's campaign is that he hasn't had to make hard, fast decisions on some of these issues. He's been able to get over on rhetoric versus making hard policy. That's a fact. And that concerns me going forward. Like I said, the numbers will dictate for both of them. If they don't have the numbers, then we're going to have a partisan war. My question is "Who would be better at that?" Clinton is better at that. I think that Hillary Clinton has the backbone, history – she has what it takes. She learned from her husband, but I think she's going to be stronger than her husband. There are going to be a lot of things she can accomplish that he couldn't. I don't know how committed Obama is to any of our issues – of course there's DOMA, but what about something closer to my heart: when he wanted the black vote, Obama went around and got all these ministers in South Carolina and then put a homophobe – and when he was pressed about that, he was a politician through and through. He didn't stand up and remove McClurkin. He tried to shoot down the middle.

AB: But that's what every politician does! That's what Hillary Clinton does. That's what she did Tuesday when asked about her tax records -

JB: That's fine, but he's trying to say that he's different than Hillary Clinton – that he's transcendent, and that's where I don't think his argument stands up. He's just like every other politician.

AB: So he's just like Hillary Clinton in that respect?

JB: I think he's just like every other politician.

AB: Including yourself?

JB: I think that Hillary Clinton personally is more committed to the issues that I care about and she's not trying to present herself as someone who's above it all – that has value.

AB: Okay. Let's get back to you – What did your parents say to you when you came out?

JB: They were both supportive. My dad said that I'm his son, he loves me and that was that.

AB: And you have two children?

JB: Correct. I adopted them. Biologically they're dad's nephews and both of their parents died, so I took them in and made a family unit. I didn't go out and make them.

AB: How old were they when you adopted them?

JB: Nine and eleven.

AB: Did they know you were gay before their parents died?

JB: I told them about a year after.

AB: And did they know what gay was?

JB: Yeah… They did not have a positive attitude about it. They weren't exposed to positive role models or positive conversations. They were young, though, and I had an opportunity to expose them to myself and other people – my partner. Now they're very well adjusted – they're very positive, very supportive. It's interesting, because I thought they told more of their friends, but apparently they hadn't and I'm not sure they really knew what "coming out" was – and they got more phone calls than I did.

AB: Did you sit them down ahead of time and explain what would happen?

JB: I explained it, but I think that the reaction was much more powerful than what they were prepared for.

AB: Powerful how? In a positive way?

JB: Not that they were unprepared. It was a bigger reaction than – a bigger deal – they would have thought about or I expressed to them. I didn't know it was going to be that big of a deal. I didn't realize that their friends would call them and talk to them. So, it was a big deal for them, but they're both happy and supportive.

AB: Were you raised in a religious household?

JB: Well, people have different connotations as to what is religious. I was not raised in a fundamentalist household, by any stretch. I was raised Episcopalian.

AB: Do you believe in hell?

JB: Yeah.

AB: Who goes there?

JB: [Laughs] I don't want to get into the theological…

AB: You are a politician! [Laughs] So, what is your next step?

JB: I have a session that I'm in until June and working on the issues that I'm interested in – representing the district. After the session I'll make the decision as to whether I'll run for reelection. If I'm able to get reelected, I think that would be a big statement for the district and who I am and the record I was able to establish. It's one step at a time.

Page: 1 2
 
 
Fark Facebook Digg StumbleUpon Del.icio.us Reddit
Comments (7)

No. 1 · leomoore

Regardless of what Republicans do, it's ignorant sheep-like American voters who make them so successful.

Posted: Feb 29, 2008 at 12:02 am
No. 2 · Mr C

Another African American who just feels that Blacks can't assume leadership in full. Thus another "Yes Sir, Yes Ma'am brother. Hill(not)ary
is going so DOWN!

Posted: Feb 29, 2008 at 2:29 am
No. 3 · Ash

Jesus, can he answer a single political question without dodging the issue? What an ass.

Posted: Feb 29, 2008 at 9:43 am
No. 4 · Bitch Republic

Just because Bartlett doesn't think Obama is electable doesn't mean he doesn't "feel that Blacks can't assume leadership in full." He's just not a blind sheep like the rest of the Obama followers. Obama isn't experienced enough to be president. He's naive and so are most of his supporters.

Posted: Feb 29, 2008 at 1:16 pm
No. 5 · Tish

That's such a bland statement to make that "he's naive and so are most of his supporters". Now Obama supporters have to be blind sheep and followers? Anyone with political ties to a party can be a "blind follower"so how is it that only Obama SUPPORTERS are the followers.

Who gives you the gage to know if he'll be successful "enough" to be president? Bush was? Because he was governor of Texas? And that went so well for us down here in Texas?

Sheesh, people support a candidate not because they are "blind" but because they like the candidate for various reasons and feel he would be a good fit as their commander in chief.

Posted: Mar 1, 2008 at 9:03 am
No. 6 · ProfessorVP

Tut-tut, Tish. Even though the 2004 election was fixed in Ohio, Bush did get more votes than Kerry. Aside from those few who obviously profited from Bush-Cheney, ie Big Oil, no-bid construction and war services profiteers (Halliburton for one), rich tax evaders, weren't the others "blind"… not seeing what was really there? All I know about Bartlett is what I just read here, and it does seem that when it comes to Hillary, he is not seeing what is really there. Blind as a bat.

Posted: Mar 1, 2008 at 4:36 pm
No. 7 · M Shane

The 41-year old explained to our editor this week that while he didn’t necessarily keep his sexuality a secret, he wasn’t so sure how it would fit into his political aspirations: “I considered at the time, ‘Well, if you’re gay, that means you can’t do anything political, this might limit you in terms of career.’”
If that isn't double talk, nothing is. "Don't talk don't ask. " can't imagine anyone knew anything about him at all.

Posted: Mar 2, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Leave a Comment

It's easier to leave comments when you register for an account. It's quick.

Already have an account? Then log in!

By posting, you agree to our Comments Policy.

 
 
Scroll Posts
Queerty Home | Advertise | Copyright 2009 Jossip Initiatives