The campaign, which hopes to revoke gay citizens' right to marry, recently ran the above ad in which they again claim that same-sex nuptials will infiltrate the public school system. And to prove their point, the commercial's creators used news footage from a field trip in which students went to see their lesbian teacher get married – footage some parents say exploits their children. And now they're fighting back:
The parents of the two children most prominently featured in the latest multi-million dollar Prop 8 political spot today termed those ads “distasteful and exploitative†and demanded that the ads be taken off the air immediately. Both sets of parents – Laura Hodder and Matt Alexander and Jen Press and James Moore, sent two hand-delivered letters this morning. The first letter is to the Prop 8 Campaign demanding the ad be removed from its television and its Web site where it is being used as a fund raising tool. The second letter to the San Francisco Chronicle asks them to intervene on their behalf.
…
In their letter to the Prop 8 campaign, the parents wrote: “We are absolutely outraged that you have chosen, without permission, to shamelessly hijack the images of our innocent children to promote a cause that we in no way, shape or form support. It is even more maddening that you have willfully and calculatingly edited the images of our children, with menacing music in the background, in a way that is completely contrary to their nature and harmful to them.â€
The Yes on 8 campaign would like the public to believe gay people are bad for children, but it seems to us they're far more dangerous and calculating than any queen we've encountered.
The parents held a news conference on the matter, which we've included below.
DNC Explains What Happened In Maine (But Not Why It Bailed on Question 1) (10)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: The bouncing check is in the mail…. »
Will Iran Cancel the Death Sentences of 3 ‘Homosexual Conduct’ Criminals? (13)
· Joseph says: Frank is right. Any religious fundamentalists, if given the chance to be in power, will... »
We Love It When Neil Patrick Harris Gets ROUGH (2)
· futureworld84 says: GOD I WISH NPH was on my phone! »
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: Que? »
Can’t A Television Show Say ‘Fag’ Anymore Without GLAAD Getting Upset? (73)
· cgd says: @72 Would this be the same post-homophobia generation that uses “gay” to mean... »
The Zealots Who Will Try to Incite a Religious-Based Hate Crime (19)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: A lot of fuss from people worshiping invisible Gods! »
Were These Dads Harassed + Detained By Wal-Mart Because They’re Gay? (22)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: If you don’t check the self-scanned items that you put into... »
What Does the House’s Healthcare Bill Mean to You? Tax-Free Benefits, That’s What (6)
· Markie-Mark says: Even if the DP benefits get past the Senate, the bill is not scheduled to take... »
Is It Wrong to Refuse to Have Sex With HIV-Positive Men? (93)
· dontblamemeivotedforhillary says: Assholes have been around a lot longer than AIDS. Fucking an... »
Jay Leffew Is Sorry For Attacking Davey Wavey, But Not YouTube’s Apathetic Gays (1)
· Fitz says: F’ing Christian. Bring me a lion. »
Well said! It is disgraceful what the right is doing in California, I am glad these people spoke up!
Dave, WGB
Yes on 8 = child predators!!!!!
The three parents in this video are awesome. I hope this makes national media.
I don't live in Cali but I'm alerting my uncle who does to vote no on the prop.
It's quite clear that Jesus is against Proposition 8. The majority of Americans belong to Churches that agree.
That video is a ready-made No on 8 TV commercial. My heart breaks for those parents.
The comments above say it all and say it well. Bravo to the parents involved.
Um, Rev Joe, there was no such thing as Proposition 8 when Jesus was alive, it ain't in the Bible, and as far as I'm aware, the concept of separation of church and state did not exist at that time. So, unless you have a hotline to heaven, you, sir, cannot presume to know WHAT Jesus is for or against. Stop giving yourself airs, you presumptuous jerk.
And my gut tells me that "the majority of Americans," these days, don't consider themselves to be practicing members of any particular church.
actually the bible says render unto ceasar that which is caesar- which is well understood to mean that there is suppose to be a separation of church and state. it's only the fundamentalist/theocrats which seem to ignore the long held modern understand of the separation. indeed city of god, city of man, as i remember was about that very issue. do you think separation of church and state happened as an inpendent event from religious thinking? they sort of mixed and slowly divided.