Queerty is better as a member
No worries Mr. Robertson, no way no one would ever accuse you of statements that could be considered an “indictment of the homosexual community.”
Nope definitely not, never in a million years. You’ve shown nothing but christian love and non judgmental support for the homosexuals.
Now can we get back to exactly how these gay rings, worn by the homosexuals, cut fingers and transferred blood, in a non indictment of the homosexual community context, of course.
This controversy has forced me to reveal my role in the development of weaponized homosexual rings.
Pat Robertson IS right, it’s just that he got the context wrong; there IS such thing a an AIDS ring. It’s called Jm J. Bullock’s asshole.
I haven’t understood anything he’s said in the past 30 years.
This is so disappointing. Like most gay people, I was a huge Pat Robertson fan up until this latest remark, but now my faith in him is shattered.
Those AIDS rings. You all are so clever!
@boring: Oh my!
Somebody bring this old bastard a gin & hemlock.
Okay, a ring that cuts the wearer to leak blood and cut the one shaking hands all in a specific spot, motion, time and all this simultaneously? He never mentions how it is put on or removed either. Horsefeathers, I say.
Please log in to add your comment.
Need an account? Register It's free and easy.
The Naked Rowers Return -- "Bigger, Longer & Uncut"
PHOTOS: Vladimir Putin Is Kinda Super Gay
WATCH: Björn Borg's Sexy Dressing Room Peep Show
WATCH: Behind The Scenes Of Impetus Fall 2013/14
PHOTOS: Tom Daley — An Appreciation