Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  GRATUITOUS SKIN

PHOTOS: 2 Cuties Film Themselves Frolicking In Bed

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (1) Hot (1) More Please (20)
By:           editor editor
On:           Jul 11, 2009
Tagged: , , , ,
23 Comments

No. 1 · Helga von ornstein

They are cute though I think they should have rethunk posting pic #6. His bottom lip in that pic looks deformed.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 4:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Fitz

I love how normal they look. Very approachable. Not overly worked out, or waxed, or circus-ishly huge.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 4:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Helga von ornstein

@Fitz: I love th “circusishly” remark. I have to remember that one.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 4:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · rayg · Member · 3 comments

@Fitz: Indeed they’re both very cute.

I took a look at the underwear, and it just seemed to be pretty normal stuff. Nothing very exciting.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 8:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Marius

They’re supposed to be straight, right? Just looking at the wall “art.” A couple of college kids in their new underwear hanging around in bed with a webcam.

Did Perez do the writing on the pictures?

They are cute, tough.

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 10:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Marius

@Marius:

They are cute, though. Tough was a typo and doesn’t apply here.

Sorry

Posted: Jul 11, 2009 at 10:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Republican

Eh, they’re not that cute, IMO.

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 1:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · cruskpalftidon

i think it must be in part due to the unfortunate haircuts.

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 10:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · alan brickman

Great campaign…don’t be fat jealous “Brunos” over these guys…

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 12:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · Republican

Alan,

Why do you always post the same thing? IMO, these guys aren’t that attractive or cute, especially when compared to other underwear models. Jealously has nothing to do with it.

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 1:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · John from England(used to be just John but there are other John's)

@Helga von ornstein:

he has something in his mouth..

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 1:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · M Shane

Are they gay?

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 4:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · Lucky Luke

I think they look great.

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 8:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · pdnoosh

I’m reminded of CK’s basement/wood paneling porn ad campaign circa 1994.

Posted: Jul 12, 2009 at 10:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
Posted: Jul 13, 2009 at 9:02 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 16 · Steven

Wow. Feels like a pretty desperate ad campaign, this one! Are there realy that many underwear brands trying to get in our wallets? I wonder if porn is already sponsored by underwear brands?

Posted: Jul 13, 2009 at 1:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 17 · hmmm

I know they were going for an amateur, non-staged feel. But I don’t feel like they succeeded. Looking at these pictures, they feel totally staged, like I can’t ignore the fact that there is a team of middle-aged men around these guys saying, “No, act YOUNGER, act more fratty.”

I know that the same is true for every photo shoot, but sometimes they manage to pull it off, but for some reason, I don’t think this one did. I don’t know why. The guys are cute, though.

Posted: Jul 13, 2009 at 2:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 18 · alan brickman

Actually they’re very cute…where’s your pics??….jealous
queen much?..

Posted: Jul 13, 2009 at 7:51 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 19 · cruiser

@Steven: How could it be, they don’t keep them on long enough for anyone to recognize a brand!
LOL!

Posted: Jul 13, 2009 at 7:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 20 · Timmeeeyyy

They look remarkably like my friend’s two sons.

Posted: Jul 14, 2009 at 8:44 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 21 · Zacery

Ehh, it’s not particularly ingenious – it could’a been a lot better, right? I’m not talking about the guys or the setup, I just think the poses are a bit pants (pun intended :D)

Posted: Jul 14, 2009 at 9:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 22 · Steven

@cruiser: lol

Posted: Jul 15, 2009 at 4:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 23 · OrchidIslander

Seriously, these guys are not really my type; but I think you’d have to be dead not to find photo #3 sexy.

Posted: Aug 9, 2010 at 9:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.