PHOTOS: It’s Always Miller Time
To all photographers!
Having your male models display the Calvin Klein name on their underwear #22/24 is, OLD, TIRED, WORN, UNORIGINAL and because sooo many are still photographed this way,unsexy!
Photographers, you are supposed to be of a more creative mindset, aren’t you!?!?
· Flag
@No. 2 Tackle
I was going to make the snide comment, you actually made it through all 25 pictures? Typically they are all so much the same I usually check out just a couple.
Anyway, since graciously told us that #22 and #24 are underwear shots, I had to check those.
BIG QUESTION: Is that bulge in #24 real? If so, WOW Baby!
PS: Ditto on the comment to photographers. Let me add, that the photographers should also try to understand what makes a Webber or Ritz shot of a male model alluring. As hot bodied as this model is, damn who wouldn’t want at at least a quickie with him, the photos do him an injustice — boring, seen before, and completely lacking enticement.
· Flag
he’s super ripped and hawt…don’t be too jealous…
· Flag
@ DEREK
Wow! What a way to start “your” new year off. Bitter, petty, hostial and angry. What gives you the right to tell me to STFU? Like you’re the voice of Queerty. After all, we are encouraged to LEAVE a “comment”.
And the comment that i left wasen’t a personal attack on the photographer or the model. But rather photographers and their OVER use of photographing models displaying the Calvin Klein name on their
underwear.
If that bothers you, then so be it! With the hostility and anger that you displayed, you’re are damaging “your” own spirit.
If you can get that riled-up to write something so vile, directed at someone you don’t know over something so petty as
a comment,it shows that you have alot of inner turmoil and is in need of some serious help. Someone who is at peace with themselves would not take the time to write something so evil.
And speaking of asphyxiate, well, your’re are doing it to yourself.
· Flag
LOL thanks for the armchair analysis and spiritual insight Tacky but I left my comment BEFORE the ball dropped and one of my resolutions for 2010 is to not tell off Affected, KNOW-IT-ALLL queens who are “OLD, TIRED, WORN, (and) UNORIGINAL” in the new year so I slipped one last one in before 12.
And I have the right the tell you to STFU, just like you have the right to consider yourself suited to tell photographers what (again) they should or shouldn’t be doing because you are the end all in styling male models for erotic photoshoots. Do you get it? We both “encouraged” to say whatever it is we wish. Just like you reacted to the photo, I reacted to you and you to me and so on.
So I have to laugh if you consider that “riled up”…maybe in your delicate world of artistic faux pas it is but it really isn’t hun-promise. Yes, it was a tad too much because I really don’t want you to asphyxiate. What ever would the world do without your vital input?
And as for being bitter, yeah, you got me. Petty? Sure sometimes, but et tu Brutus? Angry? Mmmm not usually but I sometimes love telling queens who are not used to being told to STFU to do just that. I mean look at the rise I get-not to mention the insight into my heart. And I am not real sure what hostial since I don’t think it’s a word but you can get back to me mmmkay?
Now I sure hope this ends our conversation but if it doesn’t, I’ll respond when I can really tell you what I think…..
· Flag
Nicely developed body, but he should avoid profiles of his head. It makes him look like the drawings I saw in American history of Native Americans who resided in the Pacific Northwest before Europeans arrived. They bound pieces of wood to the heads of infants and young children to give their foreheads a sloped appearance.
· Flag
#7.
Why so greasy? Would have been a good pic sans the shine.