Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  morning goods

PHOTOS: J(ust) D(o Me)

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (0) More Please (0)
By:           editor editor
On:           Oct 20, 2009
Tagged: , , ,
37 Comments

No. 1 · BSTL

No Thanks.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 8:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Orpheus_lost

Another giant muscled white guy, just like every other day. Whoever is choosing these models has a definite fetish.

:yawn:

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 8:33 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · Lawrence Lavender

Not even remotely attractive. I almost lost my breakfast.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 8:47 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · jojobean873

Ok, I now know what evil personified looks like. And what is the deal with his right nipple — did it get caught in a taffy puller?

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · Andrew

Another day, another scary steroid sucking specimen — not to mention another HORRIBLE headline.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:12 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · TimNCGuy

he should have shaved his chin instead of his chest

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:14 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Fitz · Member · 1602 comments

Wax much? Inject much?

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:27 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · AlanInUtah

Its obviously another one of those long drawn out Morning Goods periods where none of the guys are even remotely sexy, with most looking like complete douches. Hopefully this period will end soon.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:27 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · scottie

EWWWWWWW!

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:57 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · YellowRanger

Mmmmmeh/10

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:08 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · alan brickman

would definately be fun in bed…6’2 tall..no wonder you are all jealous!!

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · Jeffrey

Just for once, I’d like to see a Morning Goods model that actually has a smile, with white teeth. Geez, why can’t these models smile?

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · ArronC

To me, he is completely unattractive. Not to disparage his poor feelings, but that is not my type of man. I agree with whoever it was said he looks like a douche. Very judgmental of me, but he is a model, therefore his life’s goal is to be judged on his looks. So now I don’t feel bad for saying that he looks like an idiot. I don’t think anything is attractive about illiteracy.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · TimNCGuy

@ No. 12, Jeffrey,

That no smile thing is apparently another modeling rule similar to no body hair allowed.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 15 · Republican

I’m surprised at the strong negative reactions this guy is getting.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 11:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 16 · Orpheus_lost

@Republican

I can’t speak for the others, but for me it isn’t about this particular model. I’m just tired of seeing the same overly built-up body type every single day. Morning Goods is starting to look like a weight-lifting site. That’s not to say we should never see muscle-men here, but let’s have at least a little diversity. The same old, same old has gotten very dull.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 11:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 17 · dk

No, not the prettiest guy ever, but not ugly either. I’d put a ladder against him and climb right up. Big lug… I’ll bet he has the IQ of a boulder too. Which in his case isn’t a bad thing..

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 11:22 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 18 · porsha · Member · 98 comments

What is this guy modeling…shaved skin? If so, he missed his head, chin and eyebrows! If you’re gonna show buff then why not go all the way? And, please, don’t forget the eyebrows! C’mon Queerty, how about some real MEN instead of sour ‘models’. Enough already!

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 11:29 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 19 · tavdy79

Would be hot from the neck down if he was banned from shaving or waxing. Would be hot from the neck up if he put on 25Lbs.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 12:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 20 · Fitz · Member · 1602 comments

Orpheus is right– most of the comments are really directed at Querty’s choice, not the object himself. Way too much of the same. I see damn hot guys everywhere. Little tiny muscular ones, big bearish ones, beguiling youthful smiles, in-charge daddies… there is so much more out there than MG shows.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 12:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 21 · Another Guy

Pretty jaded crowd here!

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 3:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 22 · Paul

Just another cliched, overpumped, shaved, carbon copy of all the Weho homos that spend far too long at the gym and not long enough in the books – and I’d do him in a HEARTBEAT! God Bless The Gays.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 4:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 23 · zack

ha ha . .what comments. . Jaded as hell . !!

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 5:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 24 · Suburban · Member · 524 comments

#2, that body is hot (loose that shirt though), #6, not bad at all, #8, very bad lighting. @ZACK, be carefull what you say…

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 6:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 25 · Mo

I haven’t seen this many bitches since Westminster!

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 7:03 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 26 · Republican

He’s not the hottest man ever, but I think he looks damn good. I’ll never understand the love for hairy bodies, but to each his own.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 7:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 27 · Nate

This man’s face absolutely terrifies me.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 9:41 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 28 · Ricky

Um body is ok minues the Height (im 5’8- he’d be too tall :-)

but the face? IT kills the package.

Something is wrong.

Looks like Lou Diamond Philips after a few months of meth.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 29 · averageguy40

I don’t understand what the problem is with this guy. I think he’s extremely hot! Beautiful eyes, great physique…I think the only reason he isn’t smiling is because we haven’t met each other yet.

Posted: Oct 20, 2009 at 10:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 30 · rici

This guy is hot especially for a 6’4″, 210#er like me. I would love him in bed or anywhere else. All you twinks that need a small, short, hardly muscled fag, need to look over the top – go totwinks.com

Posted: Oct 21, 2009 at 11:45 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 31 · I pliss

Rici Amen to that brother!

Posted: Oct 21, 2009 at 4:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 32 · El Brucio

He’s hot, but in a kind of unapproachable way. They need to have him holding a kitten or something. :3

Posted: Oct 21, 2009 at 10:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 33 · redherring

nose dominates face. hey, just constructive criticism.

Posted: Oct 22, 2009 at 11:38 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 34 · rici

You guys outght to try a big guy sometime. Loving, carressing,beautiful foreplay, like a big puppy, until it’s time for the big f—- and then watch out for the shaft of that bull way inside you and doin’ it like a man.

Posted: Oct 24, 2009 at 12:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 35 · rici

Thanks lpliss for the backup, tried to e mail you but no luck

Posted: Oct 24, 2009 at 12:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 36 · Tackle

I don’t think the crowed here is jaded. Many are just not finding this model attractive. And @Jojobean783 mentioned the right nipple. Well that looks like Gyno from steriod use.

Posted: Nov 26, 2009 at 8:38 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 37 · thefemme · Member · 4 comments

o no o hells no

Posted: Dec 5, 2009 at 8:42 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.