Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  gratuitous skin

PHOTOS: Pipe Dreams

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Next »

GRATUITOUS SKIN — Once upon a time, underwear lines aimed at gay men were a small time, niche industry. Now we can name a dozen different brands — that all feature butt-lifting technology or junk-enhancing designs. So what do we like about Pipe Underwear? A return to form over function. Because our drawers need to look pretty; we’ll rely on the gym to make our ass look good in them.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Next »
What do you think of this post?
LOL (4) WTF (0) Hot (1) More Please (28)
By:           editor editor
On:           Feb 9, 2010
Tagged: , , , , ,
11 Comments

No. 1 · fredo777 · Member · 3010 comments

Plastic Fantastic.

Dig this spread.

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 12:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · ggreen · Member · 575 comments

Hairless munchkin with spray tan wearing ladies panties. Epic fail.

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 12:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · fredo777 · Member · 3010 comments

That man is gorgeous + you bloody well know it. I’d eat breakfast off of that ass.

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 12:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · Sam

@fredo777: I’d eat that ass for breakfast!

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 3:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · James

These photos are SPECTACULAR. I almost didn’t notice the model because the layout and photography are so imaginative.

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 5:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Ricky

where exactly does one see ladies panties? Is this a “where’s Waldo” kind of game?

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 7:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · George_Romero

Bad photog/model for pic #2: Look at how the leg in the front looks completely different from the back. Ick.

Posted: Feb 9, 2010 at 10:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · fredo777 · Member · 3010 comments

@Sam:

That, too. ; }

Posted: Feb 10, 2010 at 6:14 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · yeah

Wow, that was an epic amount of airbrushing. I hate it when they over-airbrush guys who are clearly hot to begin with and don’t need the airbrushing. These guys look hot, and (some of) the underwear is cute. Then they are airbrushed into oblivion.

Posted: Feb 10, 2010 at 5:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · mark

The model doesn’t need all the artsy fartsy sets, he would look much better with much less. The photos are SO contrived.

Posted: Feb 11, 2010 at 12:18 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · •? Dwy. Ann ? · Member · 8 comments

holy shit, this is f***kin awesome PIC!!!! the best !! whos the photographer?? amazing photograph… please tell meeee! im looking forward of this photography

Posted: Mar 19, 2010 at 8:07 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY