MORNING GOODS — Last we checked, a happy trail was supposed to leave to a treasure trove. Fortunately, something tells us you won’t need any bread crumbs to find the payoff here. (Photos: EROD Photos, Sven Bannuscher)
These aren’t dreadful, but Farhad set the bar (maybe unfairly) VERY high last Wednesday, and no set since has approached the same heat and unalloyed masculinity. The pictures subsequent to the first here too, are small and tame enough to feel like ‘bait-and-switch.’
Posted: Jun 23, 2009 at 7:13 am
· @Reply
· [Flag?]
What was that story yesterday on Queerty whining about the white male dominated face of the gay community? Not a complaint about this chap, by any stretch. But just sayin’.
Posted: Jun 23, 2009 at 10:36 am
· @Reply
· [Flag?]
What is interesting and not so interesting is the approach and lack of effective approach in showcasing the character of the model. In viewing this array of pics from this model I still see a blank canvas, art waiting to happen. Where is the make-up, the costumes, the props, the artistry. the creativity?
I’m sorry but this model is not the stunning beauty they are trying to portray. He has no exoticism, no unique feature, no jaw dropping appeal. This model is best served as a character model. He is clearly waiting for the right pair of eyes and camera lens to discover this. Look at his eyes and his expression(#14),they are asking for more of a challenge from the camera and trying to project characterization. In some of the pics the model is bored.
The blander the features the more fun it is to explore and experiment with characters in modeling, as within other genres in performing arts. At its best Modeling is performance art. Sadly, the curtain has fallen on this show.
Posted: Jun 23, 2009 at 11:29 am
· @Reply
· [Flag?]
Photographer needs to pay more attention to infill lighting and exposure. Many of the flash shots are slightly overexposed, with oposite side underexposed.
Posted: Jun 23, 2009 at 5:21 pm
· @Reply
· [Flag?]
Not bad at all. Just don’t assume all the pics are as boring as the main pic, they do get better. I like pic 8, he’s already laying down, I just want to pull those pants down and ‘do things that frighten fish’. Anyone know what movie that’s from?
Posted: Jun 23, 2009 at 6:54 pm
· @Reply
· [Flag?]
@Bitch, Please!, no, it was a ‘chick flick’ from the late 80′s, mostly female cast and a young JR was in it. I didn’t think anybody was going to bother to guess, thanks.
Posted: Jun 23, 2009 at 7:48 pm
· @Reply
· [Flag?]
These aren’t dreadful, but Farhad set the bar (maybe unfairly) VERY high last Wednesday, and no set since has approached the same heat and unalloyed masculinity. The pictures subsequent to the first here too, are small and tame enough to feel like ‘bait-and-switch.’
waste of time
Cute, but not my type.
He reminds me of that 40 year old muscle dude that dresses young and tries to pass for 25 so he can fuck the 18 year old twinks.
Boring
What was that story yesterday on Queerty whining about the white male dominated face of the gay community? Not a complaint about this chap, by any stretch. But just sayin’.
Jealous Jealous Jealous….show some cool already…
What is interesting and not so interesting is the approach and lack of effective approach in showcasing the character of the model. In viewing this array of pics from this model I still see a blank canvas, art waiting to happen. Where is the make-up, the costumes, the props, the artistry. the creativity?
I’m sorry but this model is not the stunning beauty they are trying to portray. He has no exoticism, no unique feature, no jaw dropping appeal. This model is best served as a character model. He is clearly waiting for the right pair of eyes and camera lens to discover this. Look at his eyes and his expression(#14),they are asking for more of a challenge from the camera and trying to project characterization. In some of the pics the model is bored.
The blander the features the more fun it is to explore and experiment with characters in modeling, as within other genres in performing arts. At its best Modeling is performance art. Sadly, the curtain has fallen on this show.
Not very interesting photos. I agree with dlpca. They have made him look very 80s and over-tanned.
I think he has beautiful eyes. Really gorgeous.
I think he is hot!
He is not bad looking at all. But what is with the “gelled” hairstyle from “There is something about Mary”?
Photographer needs to pay more attention to infill lighting and exposure. Many of the flash shots are slightly overexposed, with oposite side underexposed.
Not bad at all. Just don’t assume all the pics are as boring as the main pic, they do get better. I like pic 8, he’s already laying down, I just want to pull those pants down and ‘do things that frighten fish’. Anyone know what movie that’s from?
@SUBURBAN: I am not sure, but was it, “A fish called Wanda”?
@Bitch, Please!, no, it was a ‘chick flick’ from the late 80′s, mostly female cast and a young JR was in it. I didn’t think anybody was going to bother to guess, thanks.
he won’t starve..he’s got’s the goods!!
., i like that picture so much.,
ahha hope that
we have a chat celebrities here., so that we can enjoy the moment of this site.,,.,.,.,.,
.,i like so much.,,.,.. ahahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa., mauhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
hi
@Suburban: Steel Magnolias
I’m not sure why I’m looking. Is he a celebrity or something?