Comments on: PHOTOS: Smooth? Yes. Slick? That Too http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/ Free of an agenda. Except that gay one. Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:19:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: JonJon http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-224123 JonJon Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:07:40 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-224123 I'm not sure why I'm looking. Is he a celebrity or something? I’m not sure why I’m looking. Is he a celebrity or something?

]]> By: Duh! http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184991 Duh! Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:05:01 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184991 @<a href="#comment-184742" rel="nofollow">Suburban</a>: Steel Magnolias @Suburban: Steel Magnolias

]]> By: fliff http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184921 fliff Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:46:29 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184921 .,i like so much.,,.,.. ahahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa., mauhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hi .,i like so much.,,.,.. ahahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa., mauhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

hi

]]> By: fliff http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184919 fliff Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:44:27 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184919 ., i like that picture so much., ahha hope that we have a chat celebrities here., so that we can enjoy the moment of this site.,,.,.,.,., ., i like that picture so much.,

ahha hope that

we have a chat celebrities here., so that we can enjoy the moment of this site.,,.,.,.,.,

]]> By: alan brickman http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184902 alan brickman Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:25:08 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184902 he won't starve..he's got's the goods!! he won’t starve..he’s got’s the goods!!

]]> By: Suburban http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184769 Suburban Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:48:03 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184769 @Bitch, Please!, no, it was a 'chick flick' from the late 80's, mostly female cast and a young JR was in it. I didn't think anybody was going to bother to guess, thanks. @Bitch, Please!, no, it was a ‘chick flick’ from the late 80′s, mostly female cast and a young JR was in it. I didn’t think anybody was going to bother to guess, thanks.

]]> By: Bitch, Please! http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184766 Bitch, Please! Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:42:25 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184766 @SUBURBAN: I am not sure, but was it, "A fish called Wanda"? @SUBURBAN: I am not sure, but was it, “A fish called Wanda”?

]]> By: Suburban http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184742 Suburban Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:54:38 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184742 Not bad at all. Just don't assume all the pics are as boring as the main pic, they do get better. I like pic 8, he's already laying down, I just want to pull those pants down and 'do things that frighten fish'. Anyone know what movie that's from? Not bad at all. Just don’t assume all the pics are as boring as the main pic, they do get better. I like pic 8, he’s already laying down, I just want to pull those pants down and ‘do things that frighten fish’. Anyone know what movie that’s from?

]]> By: Austin http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184696 Austin Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:21:01 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184696 Photographer needs to pay more attention to infill lighting and exposure. Many of the flash shots are slightly overexposed, with oposite side underexposed. Photographer needs to pay more attention to infill lighting and exposure. Many of the flash shots are slightly overexposed, with oposite side underexposed.

]]> By: Bitch, Please! http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184688 Bitch, Please! Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:03:36 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184688 He is not bad looking at all. But what is with the "gelled" hairstyle from "There is something about Mary"? He is not bad looking at all. But what is with the “gelled” hairstyle from “There is something about Mary”?

]]> By: Z reveals http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184659 Z reveals Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:11:20 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184659 I think he is hot! I think he is hot!

]]> By: oh boy http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184543 oh boy Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:08:23 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184543 I think he has beautiful eyes. Really gorgeous. I think he has beautiful eyes. Really gorgeous.

]]> By: Steven http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184489 Steven Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:21:57 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184489 Not very interesting photos. I agree with dlpca. They have made him look very 80s and over-tanned. Not very interesting photos. I agree with dlpca. They have made him look very 80s and over-tanned.

]]> By: dlpca http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184448 dlpca Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:29:20 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184448 What is interesting and not so interesting is the approach and lack of effective approach in showcasing the character of the model. In viewing this array of pics from this model I still see a blank canvas, art waiting to happen. Where is the make-up, the costumes, the props, the artistry. the creativity? I'm sorry but this model is not the stunning beauty they are trying to portray. He has no exoticism, no unique feature, no jaw dropping appeal. This model is best served as a character model. He is clearly waiting for the right pair of eyes and camera lens to discover this. Look at his eyes and his expression(#14),they are asking for more of a challenge from the camera and trying to project characterization. In some of the pics the model is bored. The blander the features the more fun it is to explore and experiment with characters in modeling, as within other genres in performing arts. At its best Modeling is performance art. Sadly, the curtain has fallen on this show. What is interesting and not so interesting is the approach and lack of effective approach in showcasing the character of the model. In viewing this array of pics from this model I still see a blank canvas, art waiting to happen. Where is the make-up, the costumes, the props, the artistry. the creativity?

I’m sorry but this model is not the stunning beauty they are trying to portray. He has no exoticism, no unique feature, no jaw dropping appeal. This model is best served as a character model. He is clearly waiting for the right pair of eyes and camera lens to discover this. Look at his eyes and his expression(#14),they are asking for more of a challenge from the camera and trying to project characterization. In some of the pics the model is bored.

The blander the features the more fun it is to explore and experiment with characters in modeling, as within other genres in performing arts. At its best Modeling is performance art. Sadly, the curtain has fallen on this show.

]]> By: alan brickman http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184411 alan brickman Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:45:24 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184411 Jealous Jealous Jealous....show some cool already... Jealous Jealous Jealous….show some cool already…

]]> By: anyway http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184402 anyway Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:36:11 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184402 What was that story yesterday on Queerty whining about the white male dominated face of the gay community? Not a complaint about this chap, by any stretch. But just sayin'. What was that story yesterday on Queerty whining about the white male dominated face of the gay community? Not a complaint about this chap, by any stretch. But just sayin’.

]]> By: Maverick69 http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184363 Maverick69 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:38:13 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184363 Boring Boring

]]> By: galefan2004 http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184358 galefan2004 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:18:57 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184358 He reminds me of that 40 year old muscle dude that dresses young and tries to pass for 25 so he can fuck the 18 year old twinks. He reminds me of that 40 year old muscle dude that dresses young and tries to pass for 25 so he can fuck the 18 year old twinks.

]]> By: dk http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184357 dk Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:17:06 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184357 Cute, but not my type. Cute, but not my type.

]]> By: timncguy http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184329 timncguy Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:34:15 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184329 waste of time waste of time

]]> By: dvlaries http://www.queerty.com/photos-smooth-yes-slick-that-too-20090623/#comment-184328 dvlaries Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:13:34 +0000 http://www.queerty.com/?p=58178#comment-184328 These aren't dreadful, but Farhad set the bar (maybe unfairly) VERY high last Wednesday, and no set since has approached the same heat and unalloyed masculinity. The pictures subsequent to the first here too, are small and tame enough to feel like 'bait-and-switch.' These aren’t dreadful, but Farhad set the bar (maybe unfairly) VERY high last Wednesday, and no set since has approached the same heat and unalloyed masculinity. The pictures subsequent to the first here too, are small and tame enough to feel like ‘bait-and-switch.’

]]>