Queerty is better as a member

Login | Register
  morning goods

PHOTOS: So Right, But Rossong

MORNING GOODS — We almost want to tell you which Ontario bar 21-year-old model Bobby Rossong works at. But then he’d be mobbed with requests for dirty martinis, among other things. (Photos: J. Nixon, Fantastics Mag)

What do you think of this post?
LOL (0) WTF (0) Hot (1) More Please (15)
By:           editor editor
On:           Jan 11, 2010
Tagged: , , , ,
36 Comments

No. 1 · Alvaro

#16 is the most delicious!

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 7:55 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 2 · Lukas P.

Innocent, handsome face, a nice upper body, but I’ve seen better legs on a rotisserie chicken! (Esp. the last ones.) Maybe he’s afraid to, er, squat or lunge? Looks a bit like actor Steve Howie in a few of the shots, just less dazed.
Thanks, Queerty.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 8:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 3 · terrwill · Member · 2441 comments

ABsolutley perfect!

But I am 100% certain the BOQB is
gonna find multiple items to bitch about………
Countdown starts now: 5,4,3,2,1…………

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 8:25 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 4 · terrwill · Member · 2441 comments

PS: #8: Nice heart on!!

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 8:27 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 5 · REBELComx

He’s definitely dreamy… 2 is my fave. But for some reason, i just can’t help thinking he’d look even better with darker, maybe black, hair. Hmmm.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 8:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 6 · Fitz · Member · 1602 comments

He is really adorable. Those eyes!

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 9:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 7 · Jon B

Looks more like a porn star, less like a model. Tube socks and jock straps? It’s like a 70′s gay porn fantasy.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 10:24 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 8 · Erick

Delicious!

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:00 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 9 · terrwill · Member · 2441 comments

No. 7 · Jon B: Already used the googles on him! sorry
seems he’s not a pornster :’-(

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:09 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 10 · Fitz · Member · 1602 comments

No9: Buy AdMuncher. it’s wonderful

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:15 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 11 · Anyway

Can’t believe I’m saying it, but it was a complete joy clicking through every last picture. This kid is hot — doesn’t need a minute longer on the vine.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:21 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 12 · dk

Absolutely beautiful. He seems to get younger and less muscular the more you click. Not a complaint, just an observation. I’d have to ask for ID on the last one.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 13 · terrwill · Member · 2441 comments

No. 1 · Jonathon: FYI: a site like this costs tens of
thousands of dollars to design and create. And there are substantialmonthly fees to the ISP which to the company which hosts it. Those banner ads are which keeps this site free to
those who view and post on the site. I actually consider it
a sign of progress that so many mainstream companies are
more than willing to have their products and services
associated with a site in which there is absolutley no
disputing as to the community it is target to. And you know
what? I actually got an excellent rate on a car rental
thru one of those ads………………..

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:41 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 14 · Rich

Perfect

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:52 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 15 · sal(the original)

HEY QUEERTY listen to this GARBAGE excuse from bbc.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p005p7sv

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 11:57 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 16 · Michael W.

He was offered as Morning Goods not too long ago. I remember cause he drove me crazy and I wanted to know his full name (Queerty only cited his initials or something) and someone in the comments told me it was Bobby Rossong.

…not that I’m complaining or nothing, there’s no such thing as “too much” of this perfect stud and even as recycled material he’s still better than the men occupying this space lately.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 17 · Same Crap

I like the totally vacant look on his face. 10/10

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 18 · Taylor Siluwé · Member · 178 comments

Pure awesomeness for Bobby. A little tiny cringe for the headline though. #16 should be titled – ‘sinful’ ;-)

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 19 · Same Crap

The last pic is gross. I blame the photog. Why would he sit like sans bulge? If you didn’t see his face and torso, you’d think it was a crotch shot of a French woman.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 20 · JR

@ Lukas P. You need to go back & check out #9! His legs are fine, better than fine. The photos are mismatched and random and don’t seem to be in chronological order… He goes from stud to chicken, back to stud & then chicken again. Too bad they ended the set with a not so flattering ‘chicken’ shot… Very inconsistent set but the stud pics are overwhelmingly hot though some nice pectoral fur would have been getting me to jizz my pants! Makes me think there may be some juicing going one, but why the hell not if you get results like that despite shrinking your nuts and ruining your liver, :p

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 21 · terrwill · Member · 2441 comments

No. 20 · Same Crap: Not too much filling, filling in #2 also,
howeva lets keep the fantasy going, he’s s grower not a
shower! : P

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 22 · Same Crap

I’m blaming the undies myself. Very unflattering.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 12:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 23 · romeo · Member · 1441 comments

Fine, fine, fine, and #3 should be sent on a postcard to all the boys at Exodus with the caption, “Aw, c’mon, guys, are you sure you want to desert?” LOL

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 1:06 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 24 · biatches

Bobby goes to my University – he’s a really nice guy. I’ll tell him he’s the model of the day lol

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 1:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 25 · Fitz · Member · 1602 comments

Regarding the people commenting on his crotch: we have no idea what he looks like there. And even if he isn’t Mr. Big, he adorable… there are lot’s of guys out there whose best attribute is their dick, maybe this guy can just be appreciated for being super fit and handsome and not covered in douchy tribal tatts?

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 1:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 26 · terrwill · Member · 2441 comments

No. 26 · Fitz: Anyone who thinks they can make an accurate judgement as to the size of one’s tool by looking at Mr. Softee
needs to have their Gay card revoked.

Based on years of “hands on” research in the field I can attest that there truly is a phenoma known as “a grower, not a shower”. One can seem to have a minus rather than a penis at one glance and then suddenly see a baseball bat has grown right in front of your eyes. (take that chia pet!) That being said I totall agree, would hit that regardless of the what he weilds………….

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 1:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 27 · Taylor Siluwé · Member · 178 comments

No. 24 · romeo

LMAO!!!

Don’t worry, I’m sure they’re all reading this anyway, masturbating, then crying, then praying, then masturbating again ….

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 2:44 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 28 · Dasher

Pretty hot. If somebody doesn’t want him, I’ll take him. Wouldn’t mind doing some hands-on research, too…

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 2:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 29 · Michael W.

@BIATCHES, and tell him to get some new pictures already. I don’t care if he has to use an iPhone to take them.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 3:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 30 · kelly

Nice Canadian bacon.

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 4:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 31 · Suburban · Member · 524 comments

He is cute, and I agree with DK, but maybe those pics were arranged in order of aged progression but were in the wrong order (just a thought). I really like Pic 12 and I’d love to be alone with him in that gym (I have a boyfriend, I have a boyfriend).

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 4:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 32 · alan brickman

Jealous always likes to complain…

Posted: Jan 11, 2010 at 7:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 33 · Steven W

Great looking guy, but not especially great photos. Maybe they were going for unrehearsed, amateur charm? If so, it only worked in about half – he looks like he was wishing himself to be anywhere else in about half of them! Self-concious, I’d say.

Great to see a model who can smile though.

Posted: Jan 12, 2010 at 2:34 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 34 · Sam

In re Pic #7: I want that shirt!!! NEED. WANT. MUST HAVE.

Posted: Jan 12, 2010 at 10:49 am · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 35 · Kenneth

#6 holy shit

I think I just discovered a “weird internet fetish” I hadn’t thought of or encountered before.

Hot fratboy-looking guys in “fruity” positions or with effete/stereotypically-”gay-looking” postions.

I don’t know what to call it. Fauxmophilia?

Posted: Jan 29, 2010 at 9:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]
No. 36 · Suburban · Member · 524 comments

@Kenneth, I so agree with you. He looks like he wants to do naughty, hot, sexy things with you. I looks good wearing the red shirt, he’s cute, and I wonder what he’s packing in those jeans. And still he’s pretty femm, go figure.

Posted: Jan 29, 2010 at 9:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment · [Flag?]

Add your Comment




It's easier to add your comments when you are a member. Register or log in!


Post comments that are relevant to the article, written in clear language and that avoid personal attacks on bloggers and your fellow commenters. And take a moment to read the Queerty Comment Policy.



POPULAR ON QUEERTY

Copyright 2012 Queerty, Inc.
Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.