PHOTOS: Yes Chris Can / Queerty

No. 1 · Alexandre

ugh. twink. no thanks.

Mar 18, 2010 at 5:35 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 2 · Bunny Snuggles · Member · 157 comments

Nice body…blah…blah…blah…yes, very sexy…blah…blah…blah…

BUT why the Manikin Face? It’s so anti-charisma.

Sometimes it seems that the “morning” beefcake does indeed seem like he is a beefcake in “mourning”.

So what is this trend, Vulcans on parade or something?

Nevertheless, I think a smile is the one of the sexiest things about a dude — especially, if that’s all he’s wearning.

How about let’s see ONE on the manikins, uh, I mean the models here once in while? OK?

Mar 18, 2010 at 5:57 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 3 · Bunny Snuggles · Member · 157 comments

That should read “… especially, if that’s all he’s wearing.”

Mar 18, 2010 at 5:59 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 4 · Ricky

Yum!

What a stud!

Pic 7 really shows off how lean he is. Them muscles clinging on for dear life! ;-)

@Alexandre:

Not sure he qualifies as a twink. ;-)

Mar 18, 2010 at 7:41 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 5 · Law

Def. not a twink to the first post … while his body is nice, his expressions make him look full of arrogance and conceit, which is never attractive.

Mar 18, 2010 at 8:42 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 6 · AlanInSLCUtah

I don’t care what you all say. Oh my god is this man fucking hot! WOW!!! Perfection in my eyes.

Mar 18, 2010 at 9:26 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 7 · tommyb · Member · 42 comments

omg he’s perfectly hot

Mar 18, 2010 at 9:46 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 8 · Fitz · Member · 1653 comments

These guys are all hot, but in all the same kind of way.
Nothing wrong with them, I just like a much wider range.

Mar 18, 2010 at 10:19 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 9 · ksu499

Mmmmm. Nice. Very nice. I’m so there.

Mar 18, 2010 at 10:26 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 10 · duh

yawn.

Mar 18, 2010 at 11:18 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 11 · That Bitch Téa Delgado

Yes, he’s hot, but also bland. I’d like to see some personality and I’m not seeing that here.

Mar 18, 2010 at 11:43 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 12 · Kick In The Krotch

Ah Queerty, the gay bashing capital of the net! Not even the Westboro Baptist Church or Focus on Family could do more damage to the gay community than the nasty, self-loathing, bitter bitches who come here for their daily rant.

Mar 18, 2010 at 12:10 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 13 · romeo · Member · 1441 comments

Cute guy, but I hope underpants with suspenders doesn’t become a fad.

Mar 18, 2010 at 1:04 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 14 · hardmannyc · Member · 1071 comments

Cute guy, but #3 reminds of Zoolander working in the coal mine.

Mar 18, 2010 at 1:42 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 15 · Sam

Yummy, yummy, yummy!

Mar 18, 2010 at 3:33 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 16 · mark

hottie

Mar 18, 2010 at 3:48 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 17 · Bret

@Alexandre: God, yes an ugly elderly hairy fuck just does it for everyone.

I knew this site was frequented by middle aged morons (hence the prudish bullshit on the speedos guy). What a bunch of disgusting hasbeens!

Mar 18, 2010 at 5:46 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 18 · Hilarious

Hairlessness is such a turn off. I don’t get the trend. Unless they’re trying to look pre-pubescent. Ick.

Mar 18, 2010 at 7:09 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 19 · alan brickman

once again with the jealous….no wonder equal rights are taking so long…

Mar 18, 2010 at 7:32 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 20 · Frank

Far too much airbrushing….

Mar 18, 2010 at 9:17 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 21 · McShane

Frank, you may be on it; there is something peculiar about the shots that I can’t figure out. Compositionally the only aspects are the repeateds pants falling down and cold expression-doesn’t even look nasty.

Mar 18, 2010 at 9:51 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 22 · jeffree

Chris wears workgloves because he doesnt want to break a nail! duh!

theres a personallity in him somewhere just trying to get out !! he looks unconfortable looking at the lense.

yes I agree it wouldnt kill him to smile!
maybe his cheeks or lips cant move!!

bret swears like he didnt read the rules. flag him like Mount everest! no more nastyness bret.

Mar 18, 2010 at 11:38 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 23 · Enzo · Member · 4 comments

I’ll start off with saying that the pouty, arrogant look he has going on works, and the ninth photo–Chris as a life guard in that little red speedo–is beautiful.

That being said, I have to agree with the second post, but it isn’t that he is just completely unable to smile. It’s that he has almost no emotion. I think that’s something people forget. It isn’t about how beautiful your body is, if you can’t convey any appeal of emotion.

@JEFFREE I wouldn’t want to break a nail if I looked like that either. His looks are all he seems to have going for him. I’d take care of them.

Mar 19, 2010 at 2:38 am · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 24 · Steven W

Nice bod, but I think it looks *bad* when he pouts. Despite the stupid denim strip about his neck, I think #10 is the best – the colours are good and he looks oh so much more comfortable in it.

Mar 19, 2010 at 3:45 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 25 · Rollingmyeyes

@jeffree: Oh, shut up and sit the heck back down, Jeffree, you nelly queen. It must be very painful having such thin skin.

Oh, and yes, this twink/not-a-twink is waaay hot.

Mar 21, 2010 at 6:07 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 26 · G S H

Pictures #4 and #13

I could suck his toes for hours.

Mar 22, 2010 at 3:53 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag

No. 27 · yeah

meh

Mar 23, 2010 at 4:33 pm · @Reply Reply to this comment

· Flag