@Ogre Magi: No, and just so you know that any complaint against them will result in them comparing their utter sad life choice to homosexuality and oppression.
Which in itself is utterly offensive and demeaning to anyone who has ever suffered actual discrimination and oppression.
Even though it isn’t valid they’ve not abandoned this rhetoric since those stupid furries and cat weirdo’s.
·
As someone who has this fetish, along with many many others I can attest that it is no different than any other sexual fetish. Adult Baby and Diaper Lover are both fetishes which are not quite as rare as you may think nor is it “disgusting” or “weird”, words which are universally used to describe fetishes you’re not into. To you it may seem strange but to those who are into it it’s just as normal as any other type of sexual activity.
·
@Caleb in SC: You don’t have to “get it”. Just like a sexual infantilist doesn’t have to “get” why some men get off sexually wearing make-up and a bra and panties.
·
Interesting thread…. I don’t get the diaper-infantalization thing, but I have my own kinks and sexual quirks. I don’t judge it or think it’s not genuine, but can we really say that the close intimate sexual communion of two people is equally expressed in all ways? Is it real genuine (dare I say “spiritual”) communion? Does my donning a diaper and sucking on a pacifier result in some higher level of connection with my “partner?” These are rhetorical questions….. I don’t know the answer but it’s worth asking. Perhaps “my kink” is just less “edgy”…. perhaps this is genuine connection for these folks. But I’ve got to at least ponder the issue…
·
I guess they wanted a more illustrative manifestation of their trudging about in a depressed, brooding state with their “no one understands me” mentality. What better way to do that than sitting in your own shit?