Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
 

Prince William’s Crown Jewels

Back when Prince Charles was a boy, there were never those obnoxious photographers snooping around capturing his every move. Okay, perhaps the paparazzi were a problem in the 1950s and 1960s, but at least they had some decency back then. Not today, and not with Prince Williams. Because here he is, taking a break from a polo match to relieve himself, and sharing with the world what only Kate Middleton should be seeing. The NSFW photos below.

 

[via Ashton Cruz]

By:           editor editor
On:           Nov 21, 2008
Tagged: ,

  • 100 Comments
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      (Hairy?) Harry next.

      Make it happen, Queerty.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 4:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • kelly
      kelly

      The royal we.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 4:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dvlaries
      dvlaries

      Nice dick.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 4:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • mark
      mark

      in an unrelated story, Kate Middleton buys a large vibrator

      Nov 21, 2008 at 4:14 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Erick
      Erick

      Wow it took 4 days to break in the US. You guys are getting sloppy.

      Seems nice doesn’t it?

      Nov 21, 2008 at 4:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Robert
      Robert

      Wow… he carries his own royal scepter…

      Nov 21, 2008 at 4:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dvlaries
      dvlaries

      Are they raising hell about this over in jolly old England? No sympathy here if they are. William is 26 years old, no child anymore. If there’s any two people on Earth who should be wholly savvy about how ruthless celebrity photographers are, it’s the two sons of Diana. If William or Harry then want to gamble whipping out his dick in the great outdoors…

      Nov 21, 2008 at 5:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jack
      Jack

      dvlaries – yes, that’s all they’ve been talking about on the BBC news…the ‘man has penis’ shocker.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 5:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jack E. Jett
      Jack E. Jett

      Japhy Japhy Japhy…..

      I thought you had a rule about penis/dick/cock
      in journalism.

      Voss can’t talk about it, or ask about it, but you are going to show it. MMMMMM….

      Either way, nice fucking dick. Now, I want to see the Harry meat.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 5:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rev. Jim Cunningham
      Rev. Jim Cunningham

      Ok you silly boys. He isn’t holding his royal member in that way because it is the royal way to do it. The prince is uncircumcized as God made him to be, and he is simply holding back his foreskin. Fortunately for the prince, Princess Diana had real decency and did not follow the criminal royal custom of penile mutilation.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 5:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • michael
      michael

      I remember the photo that made the rounds of his pop’s pecker.
      Dad is hung like a mule. His is nice but he obviously did not inherit
      his fathers girth.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 6:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rick Heintz
      Rick Heintz

      Is that an electric fence he’s pissing on? OUCH!

      Nov 21, 2008 at 6:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kel
      Kel

      Erick , you mean it took us 4 days to even care about some dicks dork.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 7:16 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sapphocrat
      Sapphocrat

      I recall the first time a British tabloid caught Willy with his willy out in public, taking a whiz in a park, when he was maybe three years old. Can’t remember which tabloid, but I’ll never forget the headline: “THE ROYAL WEE.”

      Nov 21, 2008 at 7:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @michael:

      Where can one find these photographs you speak of?

      You know, for science…

      Nov 21, 2008 at 7:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Michael vdB
      Michael vdB

      lol…for science. Yes, of course. Jolly good.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 9:27 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Michael vdB:

      haha

      It was worth a shot.

      – Googles -

      Nov 21, 2008 at 9:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Pritt
      Pritt

      Uncircumcised. I like non-mutilated dick. Yummy.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 9:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Craig
      Craig

      There’s nothing wrong with circumcized penises. They are quite lovely in fact. “Mutilated”, my ass. Let’s not give people a complex.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 10:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Craig:

      Damn right.

      I’m quite happy with my “mutilated” dick + prefer them cut to uncut. To each his/her own.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 10:20 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • michael
      michael

      @fredo777: The photo was all over the net maybe?????? 3 years ago? It was shot through the windows of either a hotel room or a bedroom in one of the princes
      residences. He was actually putting on his underwear and its a side view. Nice, thick cock and very pretty to boot. Maybe if you google around its still out there. I will try and get back.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 10:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @michael:

      Cool. I’m on the hunt.

      Gracias.

      Nov 21, 2008 at 11:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Ryan
      Ryan

      Looks like he has foreskin covering the head.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 2:49 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sperm Bank Collections Dept.
      Sperm Bank Collections Dept.

      Yes, I suppose that if you had your nose or your ears or your eyelids or your nipples sliced off at birth you’d think that looked good merely because you’re used to seeing it like that. Maybe if they started cutting off our cock heads at birth we’d start saying that was normal and attractive too (insert wretching sound here). Even the Apostle Paul called circumcisors “The Concision”, which means “The Mutilators” (Philippians 3:2). Not that i dislike a cut guy who had no say when he was deformed. Me partner was mutilated too, but I still love him. I’m glad someone as hot as William has everything he was born with – especially the most important parts.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 8:39 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kyllen
      Kyllen

      @ 23 · Ryan Looks like he has foreskin covering the head. —

      That’s how it is supposed to be! Imagine how much money you save in your teenage years not having to buy gliding cream for masturbation. Uncut is normal, cut is mutilated and primitive. If you were mutilated as a baby, not your fault, but don’t do it to future guys. Penis mutilation was probably invented by some crooks so that they could recognize each other? Many teen boys die every year in Africa because of botched mutilations. Google it. Looks unnatural and not sexy at all not to have your foreskin. My opinion.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 9:46 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Charles
      Charles

      Sometimes you just got to piss.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 9:53 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • john
      john

      he has a nice fat cock

      Nov 22, 2008 at 11:58 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Sperm Bank Collections Dept.:

      Give me a fuckin’ break.

      You’re acting like someone removed a foot or a couple fingers.

      @Kyllen:

      That is your opinion. Mine is that you’re totally wrong + circumcision isn’t that big of a deal. We’re born with umbilical cords attached to us, too, but we don’t keep those, either, do we?

      All of this “I’m a whole man because I’ve got a little hood of skin over my winky” business is getting old.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 1:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Robert
      Robert

      My friend was uncut, then had it cut, now he has performance issues… I think its all in his head, but who knows.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 2:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kyllen
      Kyllen

      @ FREDO777 “We’re born with umbilical cords attached to us, too, but we don’t keep those, either, do we?”

      Idiotic comparison. The umbilical cord is there to support the fetus via the mother. After birth it falls off.

      Circumcision is trying to improve on Gods work. How is that for arrogance?

      I think it was used for sinister purposes in days gone by (like recocknising (sic) birds of a feather). Today it’s just dumb to cut off a guys foreskin. It makes the penis much more insensitive, looks bad and gives the victim a complex. Also it’s often done without asking the person because he is still a kid (baby). It’s mutilation and sick. We are in the 21st century for crying out loud.

      Once cut you’ll never know how nice it is to have a foreskin and how it will feel. EVER!

      Nov 22, 2008 at 2:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Kyllen:

      Wrong.

      After birth, the cord is… what? what? Cut off.

      The remainder falls off later, yes. The point being, the cutting of the umbilical cord is no more or less traumatic than that of removing the foreskin.

      It was based on a covenant with God, as far as I recall. Not that I much care about that. More importantly, I think it looks better. Much better, tbh. And there’s less maintenance, if you will.

      I don’t want to know how it feels to have a foreskin, as I don’t find them appealing. If one wanted to, however, a man can have a procedure done to “restore” his foreskin or use a prosthetic. Whatever floats your boat.

      A complex? Nonsense. I think it just boils down to aesthetic differences more than anything. Sure, there are professed benefits to being uncut. There are also benefits to being cut. I prefer my penis being less sensitive, for one thing. If you want a foreskin, however, there are ways, like I said. If you don’t, you can have it removed. Simple.

      I don’t want one + am glad that mine was removed, but to each his own.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 3:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • tony the tiger
      tony the tiger

      Circumcision SIGNIFICANTLY reduces the risk of HIV infection, other sexually trasmitted diseases and cancer.

      The foreskin acts as a sponge that attracts HIV antibodies.

      In fact the UN is funding adult circumcision for men in Africa on this basis.

      IN FACT: anthropologists believe that the Jews recognized the health benefits from circumcision thousands of years ago which is why it is built into their custom (just like Jews don’t eat pork because thousands of years ago they knew it was frequently infected by trichinosis in their environs).

      Nov 22, 2008 at 3:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Roy Pyatt
      Roy Pyatt

      @Tony The Tiger.. Junk science maybe, it seems as for some reason being uncircumcised only increases HIV infection in heterosexual sex.
      And as for cancer the myth was debunked years ago.
      And today we have access to soap and water and when used together they work wonders for cleaning all sorts of things.. check it out

      Nov 22, 2008 at 3:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Brian Miller
      Brian Miller

      Hey, cutting off the penis almost eliminates HIV risk altogether — why not have the UN fund that too?!?

      Nov 22, 2008 at 8:37 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Kyllen
      Kyllen [Different person #1 using similar name]

      @ 31 “I don’t want one + am glad that mine was removed, but to each his own.”

      Agree. As long as I can decide when I’m of age whether I want to be or not to be. But not having things done to me as a baby or kid that I did not consent to. Also now, being cut, you’ll never know how it feels with foreskin. Re “covenant with God”, not my God!

      @ 32 – There are billions of Chinese and Indians and Europeans who live healthily without being cut. They have as much fun as anyone and don’t get any STD’s. I never have! Re Jews and health benefits, I doubt it. But maybe the dessert and the sand might have something to do with it. Wonder what happened to the women though in that case. They are even more exposed (I believe). Also, we live in 2008. Anyway, cut, don’t, I’m glad I still have mine.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 9:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Kyllen:

      “you’ll never know how it feels with foreskin”

      If I wanted to, I could. Again, though, I don’t.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 9:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Gabriel
      Gabriel

      What a surprise… bunch of hysterical anti-circumcision trolls. Yawn. Sorry but electrophysiological studies show there’s no difference in sensation. What you call junk science is simply science that doesn’t fit your preconceived notion of how the world, or in this case, the penis operates. Get over it, idiots.

      Nov 22, 2008 at 10:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John
      John

      All this back and forth… and we forget that we’re looking at a decent looking penis here… cut or uncut. Sit back and enjoy the view… the future King of England’s prick… and leave the politics out of it!

      Nov 22, 2008 at 10:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Insideguy
      Insideguy

      “Now we know know William will never be the UKs next ruler. That’s no 12″ there.”
      – An English Size Queen

      Nov 23, 2008 at 2:10 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • David
      David

      The princley Prince has an accordian style dick. A grower and a shower, it’s in the g-eans.
      More show and the photog would probably have fogged up the lense and lost the shot for everyone. The Prince wouldn’t want that to happen to his hot to trot boy shot. He gave just enough for the public to want more, making him a royal and exacting tease. That’s perfect PR.
      Mom taught her boys well that in some cases, less is more for the taudry porno public.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:01 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I prefer my penis being less sensitive, for one thing.

      The most absurd argument you’ve made for circ yet, Frdeo. You want to feel less sensations during sex? Seriously? When are you going to have your prostate removed? That way you won’t feel shit–literally.

      I’m not going over my points again, simply because I don’t want to be accused of kicking sand in your face. However my points from a previous thread can be searched for by those so inclined.

      As far being less sensitive, Fredo, worry not because by the time you reach your forties your penis will be so desensitized, popping Viagra will be considered foreplay.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 5:19 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @Gabriel:

      What a surprise… bunch of hysterical anti-circumcision trolls. Yawn.

      What a surprise–a circ queen. Strapping newborns down and cutting into healthy bodies–Hot!

      Sorry but electrophysiological studies show there’s no difference in sensation.

      Because the glans was tested and previous tests have shown that an erect glans has very little sensation to begin with–a pin can be pushed into the glans with very little pain. However the foreskin was not tested on intact males and of course not on cut males–for obvious reasons.

      What you call junk science is simply science that doesn’t fit your preconceived notion of how the world, or in this case, the penis operates.

      No. It’s research that was begun with a specific conclusion sought before the studies began.

      Get over it, idiots.

      Is that what you will be telling the thousands of Africans who become infected with HIV over the next ten years because white Americans sold them a false hope in the form of circumcision?

      Nov 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      After birth, the cord is… what? what? Cut off.

      No, it’s cut; it is not “cut off.” In fact, in many tribes it was bitten through by the mother, or father. Should we continue this barbaric ritual as well?

      The point being, the cutting of the umbilical cord is no more or less traumatic than that of removing the foreskin.

      This is a picture of a newborn in a circumstraint, Fredo, if you have the balls, look at it and again try to claim that circumcision is, “no more or less traumatic” than snipping through an umbilical cord, (which has no never endings and transfers no pain sensation to either the mother, or child).

      *WARNING*

      A disturbing image:

      http://tinyurl.com/5s7y99

      Nov 23, 2008 at 5:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Gabriel
      Gabriel

      “As far being less sensitive, Fredo, worry not because by the time you reach your forties your penis will be so desensitized, popping Viagra will be considered foreplay.”

      Oh yes, your “finding” that because Viagra is prescribed more often in the US it’s because of circumcision. Correlation doesn’t denote causality – take a remedial stats class. Medication, whether it be Viagra, anti-depressants, Ritalin, etc. is generally over-prescribed in the US. Duh.

      “No. It’s research that was begun with a specific conclusion sought before the studies began.”

      Wrong again. That’s not how science works. Saying that there would be no difference in sensation is the null hypothesis since it posits there would be no change. And studies have found that to be the case. Just because things didn’t go the way you expect doesn’t mean there is some evil agenda by scientists or medical professionals.

      “Is that what you will be telling the thousands of Africans who become infected with HIV over the next ten years because white Americans sold them a false hope in the form of circumcision?”

      More hysteria. Nobody said circumcision alone is going to stop HIV. But nice try blaming Americans over something that has nothing to do with us. The studies speak for themselves.

      Maybe you should remember, like John pointed out, that this post is supposed to be about enjoying the sight of Prince William’s penis. But some asshole, followed by other assholes like you had to call men who are circumcised, “mutilated”. I don’t know why you people have such a need to make others feel bad about themselves but that’s your problem, not ours. So maybe you should just shut the fuck up.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      Blah blah blah

      I don’t recall being circed + am pleased with the result. Hence, no trauma. If I wanted to restore my foreskin, I’d do so. No interest.

      Yes, I am happy with not having my penis over-sensitive. It’s absurd to think that it isn’t possible to make an argument against being too sensitive, as well as one could argue not being sensitive enough.

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe people can actually purchase penis desensitizers for the very purpose of enjoying sex for longer.

      And I’ll pass on your “disturbing image”, thanks. I don’t look at abortion images that rabid pro-choicers share to shock me into agreeing with them, either.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:04 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      * pro-lifers

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:08 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Word of caution, though. I’m not going to engage in a drawn-out debate over this topic. I’ve made my stance on the issue pretty clear + find the whole “mutilation” argument pretty silly.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @Gabriel:

      Medication, whether it be Viagra, anti-depressants, Ritalin, etc. is generally over-prescribed in the US. Duh.

      Your opinion notwithstanding, (and this is your opinion, as opposed to the facts I provided,) American males use more Viagra than any other nation. There is a reason for it and over zealous prescribers isn’t it, Gabe.

      That’s not how science works.

      Exactly. But that’s how may of the studies citing circ as a protection against HIV was carried out–with bias.

      Saying that there would be no difference in sensation is the null hypothesis since it posits there would be no change. And studies have found that to be the case.

      You cannot claim a study that did not test the entire penis trustworthy, because men do not have sex with only their glans. You cannot claim a foreskin is not sensitive, if the foreskin is not tested. the excuse given by the researches for not testing the foreskin? Cut men don’t have one, so its not “fair” to test the foreskins of intact males.

      Nobody said circumcision alone is going to stop HIV.

      No one has bothered to inform the men being duped into circ, Gabe.

      MBABANE, 31 July 2008 (IRIN) – There is a growing belief among men in Swaziland that circumcision provides complete protection against HIV, a perception that worries non-governmental organisations (NGOs) battling the highest HIV prevalence rate in the world.

      http://tinyurl.com/66jd73

      But nice try blaming Americans over something that has nothing to do with us.

      Bailey and Halparin–two Americans–have spearheaded the drive for mass circ in sub Saharan Africa.

      The studies speak for themselves.

      The study which was halted before the research was complete and announced a success? or the study which found that circ actually increased HIV transmission? Howabout the study that showed female circ reduced HIV transmission?

      Maybe you should remember, like John pointed out, that this post is supposed to be about enjoying the sight of Prince William’s penis.

      And maybe you should remember that this is a news blog reporting on events pertaining to the LGBTQ community and not a porn blog. I’d suggest you go to Horsey’s site if all you’re looking for is celeb cock, Gabriel.

      But some asshole, followed by other assholes like you had to call men who are circumcised, “mutilated”.

      But ya are, Blanche, ya are mutilated!

      I don’t know why you people have such a need to make others feel bad about themselves but that’s your problem, not ours.

      If you feel bad about your dick Gabe, take it up with your mommy and daddy. They’re the one’s who gave a doctor–or mohle–permission to hold you down and cut into you.

      And I don’t know why you are so threatened by others questioning your foolish beliefs. If you can’t defend your absurd arguments, the don’t participate, douchebag.

      So maybe you should just shut the fuck up.

      Get a fucking life. Go back to your porn trolling and let the grown ups talk.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • John
      John [Different person #1 using similar name]

      Why are you queens constantly squabbling and arguing about the dumbest f**king things? Get over yourselves.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:46 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @John:

      Don’t look at me. This isn’t my crusade.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 6:54 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I don’t recall being circed + am pleased with the result. Hence, no trauma.

      Children block out most traumatic memories. Ask your mother how you were before and after the surgery; you might be shocked at the response.

      Yes, I am happy with not having my penis over-sensitive. It’s absurd to think that it isn’t possible to make an argument against being too sensitive, as well as one could argue not being sensitive enough.

      It’s an absurd argument. It’s like asking how much sex does one have to have? By your own admission, your penis is less sensitive than mine, or any other intact males penis. What does that mean? Well, less pleasurable sex for the partners of men who are cut:

      http://tinyurl.com/6q8wa9

      This comment from the man who provided the link:

      I found it interesting that the most orgasmic women in the world were from places like Sweden, Brazil, France, Greece,… where routine circumcision is almost unheard of.

      Meanwhile the women of Israel, where 95% of men are cut, were credited for being best at taking their pleasure into their own hands.

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe people can actually purchase penis desensitizers for the very purpose of enjoying sex for longer.

      Yes and it also desensitizes that morons partner, simply because the chemical–an anesthetic–rubs off onto their partner’s genitals.

      Getting a circ to reduce rapid ejaculation is like cutting off your foot to reduce speeding tickets.

      Now, people can also get products to increase senitivity–certain lubes, sheep skin condoms, cockrings. Care to guess whcih country is the largest user of these devices?

      And I’ll pass on your “disturbing image”, thanks. I don’t look at abortion images that rabid pro-choicers share to shock me into agreeing with them, either.

      You didn’t bother to look at the pic? How am I suppose to debate someone who is too much of a coward to look at facts? If your circ doesn’t bother you as you claim, why avoid looking at the pic?

      Also, this is the second time you have compared me to anti-choicers, Fredo. I am more pro-choice than you are–just as I support a woman’s right to govern her fetus, I support an adult man’s right to govern his penis.

      You on the other hand believe like anti-choicers, that others are better equipped to decide what should happen with other people’s bodies.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:01 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      Word of caution, though. I’m not going to engage in a drawn-out debate over this topic. I’ve made my stance on the issue pretty clear + find the whole “mutilation” argument pretty silly.

      I really don’t care what you’re going to do. Flagging be damned, I’m tired of scarred men ridiculing intact men for being normal, yet getting pissy when their ridiculous beliefs are challenged.

      My arguments are for every uncut man who has been humiliated by some pretentious queen who thinks a scar and a dried up, leathery glans is “hot” or inherently attractive, simply because that was all he ever knew, And in that regard, you fit the bill perfectly, Fredo.

      As far as a drawn-out debate, I can go all night long–and I don’t need a circ to do it.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @John:

      If you don’t have a horse in this race, John, then stay the fuck out of it.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:10 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Before + after the circumcision when I was a few days old? I’m going to go out on a limb + say that there wasn’t much difference. You’re way too worked up over this.

      As much as I love petty arguments with you, Paulie Q. Walnuts, this one is even too silly for me.

      Btw, my taste in cut penises has nothing to do with my being circumcised or not. I wasn’t born with red hair, either, but I also find redheads hot.

      Get over it, dude. Some guys like uncut dicks; some like them cut. Others don’t give a shit one way or the other. Slice of life.

      hohoho

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Also, if anyone here is getting “pissy”, I think it’s pretty obviously yourself, P.K.W.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      Whoops. Wrong fake middle initial.

      * P.Q.W.

      There, that’s better.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:32 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      Before + after the circumcision when I was a few days old? I’m going to go out on a limb + say that there wasn’t much difference. You’re way too worked up over this.

      I’m going to pretend you’re being facetious and that you aren’t really a moron.

      Go ahead, Fredo, ask your mother how you were when the nurse came and took you from your mother’s arms and strapped you down and cut you up, and how you were when the nurse brought you back to your mother.

      As much as I love petty arguments with you, Paulie Q. Walnuts, this one is even too silly for me.

      Freedom is hammered out on the anvil of discussion, dissent, and debate.
      –Hubert H. Humphrey

      Btw, my taste in cut penises has nothing to do with my being circumcised or not. I wasn’t born with red hair, either, but I also find redheads hot.

      When a red head gets his hair cut, it grows back.

      However, you weren’t born circumcised either, yet after having one you find them preferable. Which begs the question, what would you find attractive if you had not been circumcised? As you are fond of writing, you may spin it all you like, but its clear that circ has coloured what you find attractive.

      Get over it, dude. Some guys like uncut dicks; some like them cut. Others don’t give a shit one way or the other. Slice of life.

      Perhaps if you’d like to avoid having your ass handed to you, you should refrain from posting horse shit like this:

      If you dig the whole withery earthworm look, though, more power to you. Personally, I (+ plenty others) prefer a robust, shiny
      mushroom head.

      For someone who gets pissy about race, you seem to have no problem denigrating other physical forms.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      You’ve set the standard, Fredo.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 7:49 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      lmfao

      Are you seriously upset about that withery earthworm quote? Was it not blindingly obvious that I was joking about that?

      I mean, come on… A “robust, shiny mushroom head”? I prefer the look of circumcised dicks, but I still wouldn’t say anything like that in seriousness.

      And, yes, redheads can cut their hair off, which would grow back red. What’s your point? I am not a redhead + I find them attractive. I am not Latino, but I don’t find Latino men unattractive. I am circumcised, but it’s not why I find cut men attractive. Also, if I wanted to have the whole penis hood thing going on again, like I said, I could always restore the foreskin.

      I’ve got to be honest, though, I think it’s pretty sad that you went so far as to look up the article where I posted that earthworm quote. Hell, I don’t even remember where + when I had that particular conversation. It was a while back, though, from what I recall.

      Btw, you have never + will never “hand me my ass”, slick. I’m laughing all of this off, but don’t get ridiculous.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:12 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I am not a redhead + I find them attractive. I am not Latino, but I don’t find Latino men unattractive. I am circumcised, but it’s not why I find cut men attractive.

      A cut dick is not an innate form. It’s specious to argue that because you’re cut, that does not colour your perception of circumcisiion being more attracitve.

      You had to see and experience a red head a to find him attractive. You had to see and experience a Latino to find him attractive. Just as you had to see a circumcised penis to find it attractive.

      Which again brings up the point, if you were not circumcised you would not be biased against intact males.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:30 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I’ve got to be honest, though, I think it’s pretty sad that you went so far as to look up the article where I posted that earthworm quote. Hell, I don’t even remember where + when I had that particular conversation. It was a while back, though, from what I recall.

      If you don’t want your absurdity thrown back in your face, don’t write absurd things, Fredo.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Oh, pumpkin, that doesn’t make any sense.

      I’ve also seen plenty of uncut penises. Doesn’t that mean that having seen them could have made me grow to find them attractive as I have grown to find redheads + Latino men attractive, though I’m not a redhead or a Latino man?

      Also, what about those men who are cut + don’t have a preference or prefer uncut ones or those who might be uncut but prefer cut ones? It’s all just a matter of personal taste. I prefer the look of a circumcised penis, but it doesn’t mean I hate uncut guys or that I seriously find them “withery” or gross.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:36 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      “If you don’t want your absurdity thrown back in your face, don’t write absurd things, Fredo.”

      I honestly don’t mind if you post something I already made public by posting it here myself. I’m just saying, you went to the effort of finding it, copying, + pasting it here. And it was a joke. Nothing more.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I’ve also seen plenty of uncut penises.

      I find it odd that for a man who professes a distaste for uncut men, you seem to have “seen” many of them. Sorta like how anti-gay people have lots of gays friends–except we never see them with their friends.

      Doesn’t that mean that having seen them could have made me grow to find them attractive as I have grown to find redheads + Latino men attractive, though I’m not a redhead or a Latino man?

      Seen, Fredo. Its apparent that you’ve been sexually involved with red heads and Latinos, but not so uncut men. Clearly, as a cut man, you made a decision based on the visual, rather than actual experience, the type of experience you had with red heads and Latinos.

      Secondly, you have not stated that you are only attracted to red heads and Latinos, so clearly you are attracted to all sorts of hair colours and races. Which leads one to ask, if you are not biased against other hair colours and races, why are you biased against the status of a man’s penis?

      Also, what about those men who are cut + don’t have a preference or prefer uncut ones or those who might be uncut but prefer cut ones?

      Most bias is explained via ignorance, whereas a lack of bias is based on interacting with people who are different. And I’ve never met an uncut man who only had a preference for cut men.

      It’s all just a matter of personal taste. I prefer the look of a circumcised penis, but it doesn’t mean I hate uncut guys or that I seriously find them “withery” or gross.

      Personal taste based on experience. If you’re solely judging a man based on his penis, how is that different than a man who judges you solely on your race?

      So I’ll ask–you are biased against intact men, are you biased against other races; hair colours?

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:58 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I honestly don’t mind if you post something I already made public by posting it here myself. I’m just saying, you went to the effort of finding it, copying, + pasting it here. And it was a joke. Nothing more.

      I like to be though when I”m making mince meat out of someone’s argument.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 8:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @Paul Raposo:

      I like to be thorough

      Nov 23, 2008 at 9:05 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Assumptions, assumptions…

      I never said that I had been sexually involved with redheads or Latinos, just that I found them attractive. I also find Jake Gyllenhaal attractive but I haven’t had the pleasure of hitting that. I’m working on it.

      Nor did I say what about uncut men who only prefer cut ones, just those that find them more attractive.

      We could argue this until we’re blue in the face but it’s really pointless to do so. I am pretty open to lots of different types of guys, yes, but I also have things/traits/features that I don’t find attractive.

      I won’t list them all, because that’s not really anyone’s business unless I wish to discuss that with them on a more personal level. Suffice it to say, though, that I don’t find uncut penises as attractive, for whatever reason. It is what it is.

      As for “bias”, though, what about your little rant about cut guys’ “leathery” penises? Mayhaps you are projecting some of your own harsh biases where genitals are concerned onto myself + the circ set…

      Don’t worry, though, Paulie.

      I still love you + your freaky penis. <3

      Nov 23, 2008 at 9:13 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      I never said that I had been sexually involved with redheads or Latinos, just that I found them attractive.

      You never said you were not sexually involved with red heads, or Latinos either. Which makes one wonder why it is you look at hair colour and race and are not biased against those, yet look at a foreskin and you’re biased against that. If you have never experienced any of them, how do you know you actually desire them, or do not?

      Nor did I say what about uncut men who only prefer cut ones, just those that find them more attractive.

      A spurious argument, Fredo.

      I am pretty open to lots of different types of guys, yes, but I also have things/traits/features that I don’t find attractive.

      Such as race, or hair colour?

      I won’t list them all, because that’s not really anyone’s business unless I wish to discuss that with them on a more personal level.

      You felt it was everyone’s business to know you disapprove of uncut men. You’re sudden decorum is…interesting?

      Suffice it to say, though, that I don’t find uncut penises as attractive, for whatever reason. It is what it is.

      So, if I’m biased against your skin colour, is that, as you write, what it is?

      As for “bias”, though, what about your little rant about cut guys’ “leathery” penises? Mayhaps you are projecting some of your own harsh biases where genitals are concerned onto myself + the circ set…

      Oh, that was a joke, Fredo. Like when I made a joke about how an ignorant rapper spoke and you went ape shit and made me out to be David Duke incarnate. You, as someone who appears to love making jokes about people’s looks, should be the first to understand that.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 9:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      “If you have never experienced any of them, how do you know you actually desire them, or do not?”

      Talk about a specious argument…

      If a hetero guy has never had a penis inside him, how does he know he isn’t really an insatiable power bottom?

      I’m talking about what I find aesthetically pleasing.

      How do you know, btw, that I haven’t “experienced” guys with uncut penises? Did I say that I hadn’t, or did you just assume as much? Is it humanly impossible to come within three feet of an exposed uncut dick + not find them irresistible forever + ever, from that point forth?

      “You felt it was everyone’s business to know you disapprove of uncut men. You’re (sic) sudden decorum is…interesting?”

      Decorum? No, just preference. I don’t feel the need to share all of my business, tastes, likes, dislikes, etc. with you. Meh.

      “So, if I’m biased against your skin colour, is that, as you write, what it is?”

      Yes. If you’re biased against my skin color, that’s your business. Am I supposed to care if some random guy online doesn’t find black men as attractive as another race, for example?

      “Like when I made a joke about how an ignorant rapper spoke and you went ape shit and made me out to be David Duke incarnate.”

      Dude. Let it go.

      Btw, “ape shit” is a gross exaggeration.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 9:50 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Gabriel
      Gabriel

      “You cannot claim a study that did not test the entire penis trustworthy, because men do not have sex with only their glans.”

      But the big lie (well, one of several) of anti-circumcision zealots is that the glans is less sensitive because it’s no longer covered. So just admit you’re wrong and quit fetishising the foreskin as some kind of wonder tissue.

      “And maybe you should remember that this is a news blog reporting on events pertaining to the LGBTQ community and not a porn blog. I’d suggest you go to Horsey’s site if all you’re looking for is celeb cock, Gabriel.”

      I didn’t realize anti-circumcision rants from trolls were “events pertaining to the LGBTQ community”. Secondly, obviously posting pictures of Prince William pissing isn’t an event pertaining to the LGBTQ population either. Why were they posted? So gay guys could see his cock. Big deal.

      “Exactly. But that’s how may of the studies citing circ as a protection against HIV was carried out–with bias.”

      Really? You know this, how? Once again you, someone who obviously has no background in science, know better than the experts right?

      “There is a growing belief among men in Swaziland that circumcision provides complete protection against HIV, a perception that worries non-governmental organisations (NGOs)”

      Again, nobody said they shouldn’t use protection. Studies show that the rate of HIV infections is decreased in men who are circumcised. Apparently publishing said studies is now responsible for new HIV infections because people are dumb enough to think it offers 100% protection.

      “Your opinion notwithstanding, (and this is your opinion, as opposed to the facts I provided,) American males use more Viagra than any other nation.”

      You haven’t provided any facts. You just provided numbers and drew a conclusion without performing any real statistics. I realize that everyone thinks they’re an expect these days but you’ll have to do better than rehashing arguments from NOCIRC.

      “If you feel bad about your dick Gabe, take it up with your mommy and daddy. They’re the one’s who gave a doctor–or mohle–permission to hold you down and cut into you.”

      I don’t feel bad about my dick. I’m glad I was circ’ed. Cut meat looks better, smells better, and hence, tastes better. What I don’t appreciate are assholes using Queerty or other forums to spout off garbage about their own pet issues.

      “And I don’t know why you are so threatened by others questioning your foolish beliefs. If you can’t defend your absurd arguments, the don’t participate, douchebag.”

      Insulting me isn’t questioning my beliefs. You’re posting emotional, hysterical bullshit. Science isn’t on your side so that’s what you’re left with. You’re just repeating the same tired half-truths and outright lies of the anti-circumcision bandwagon and creating some of your own. It’s pathetic.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:07 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      If a hetero guy has never had a penis inside him, how does he know he isn’t really an insatiable power bottom?

      That’s a asinine comparison. You’re comparing sexuality to, a you write below, aestheticism.

      I’m talking about what I find aesthetically pleasing.

      So again, you’re basing your entire argument on what you see, rather than actual experience. It’s not like sucking cock is so far beyond what you already desire, so trying to compare a straight guy having gay sex to looking at a foreskin and deciding arbitrarily you don’t like it is pathetic.

      How do you know, btw, that I haven’t “experienced” guys with uncut penises?

      You never said you did.

      Is it humanly impossible to come within three feet of an exposed uncut dick + not find them irresistible forever + ever, from that point forth?

      Only if you’re some kind of nut. Next you’ll be telling us uncut guys have rabbit blood.

      Decorum? No, just preference. I don’t feel the need to share all of my business, tastes, likes, dislikes, etc. with you. Meh.

      You did during the previous debate on this topic, Fredo. Odd that you’re suddenly coy.

      Yes. If you’re biased against my skin color, that’s your business. Am I supposed to care if some random guy online doesn’t find black men as attractive as another race, for example?

      That didn’t stop you from accusing me of racism in a previous thread.

      Btw, “ape shit” is a gross exaggeration.

      I suggest you go back and re-read your comments.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:11 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      “That’s a asinine comparison. You’re comparing sexuality to, a you write below, aestheticism.”

      No. It’s not. This whole argument is about aesthetics. I said that I didn’t find uncut penises appealing, meaning aesthetically. I said nothing about what I found sexually pleasing, pleasing to the taste, touch, nose, etc. That was closer to your own angle, not mine.

      “You never said you did.”

      So, obviously, that means that I haven’t?

      That’s pathetic, but I’ll give the benefit of the doubt + assume that we’re past your usual bedtime.

      “You did during the previous debate on this topic, Fredo. Odd that you’re suddenly coy.”

      I most certainly did not divulge all of my tastes or dislikes in that convo or any other on this forum + I’d appreciate it if you’d stop bullshitting me + the rest of Queerty about what I said/did.

      “I suggest you go back and re-read your comments.”

      And I suggest that you stop talking out of your ass. I remember making a passing comment or two about not appreciating the tone of the “Ebonics”-speak being used in the thread + you elevated it into some drawn-out verbal brouhaha, much as you did today over what should have been a brief exchange of comments about a totally frivolous topic.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:35 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @Gabriel:

      But the big lie of anti-circumcision zealots is that the glans is less sensitive because it’s no longer covered. So just admit you’re wrong and quit fetishising the foreskin as some kind of wonder tissue.

      When one trails off into claims of zealotry, I know I have won the debate. However, I pointed out that a previous study had found the erect glans had little sensitivity.

      As far as being a fetishist, you appear to relish the thought of strapping a newborn down and cutting into their body. To defend this is monstrous.

      I didn’t realize anti-circumcision rants from trolls were “events pertaining to the LGBTQ community”.

      And I didn’t realize watching royals taking a piss was a paramount topic on gay blogs.

      Secondly, obviously posting pictures of Prince William pissing isn’t an event pertaining to the LGBTQ population either. Why were they posted? So gay guys could see his cock. Big deal.

      Since you are not the editor of this blog, I find it foolish of you to try and dictate what will and will not be discussed, Gabriel.

      However, gay men debating circ is a relevant topic because–wait for it!–gay men have cocks. No royals here–a few pissy queens–but no princes. Dicks-a-plenty though–both kinds.

      Really? You know this, how? Once again you, someone who obviously has no background in science, know better than the experts right?

      Because unlike you, I do not posses an incurious mind. I read the studies, the articles and critiques on those studies. Perhaps if you let go of your cock long enough to wonder off porn sites, you might learn a thing or two as well.

      Again, nobody said they shouldn’t use protection. Studies show that the rate of HIV infections is decreased in men who are circumcised. Apparently publishing said studies is now responsible for new HIV infections because people are dumb enough to think it offers 100% protection.

      I love debating pro-circ freaks! You are presented with evidence that things are not working out as they should, complete with links and you dismiss them and ignore their relevance to the debate; and present your opinion as fact.

      And studies have shown that the opposite is quite true:

      Circumcised men in South Africa are currently as likely to be HIV-positive as uncircumcised, according to a study in the latest edition of the SA Medical Journal.

      http://tinyurl.com/68zzw9

      You haven’t provided any facts.

      You’ve ignored the facts I provided, as is normal with anti-foreskin people.

      You just provided numbers and drew a conclusion without performing any real statistics. I realize that everyone thinks they’re an expect these days but you’ll have to do better than rehashing arguments from NOCIRC.

      I provided numbers showing that American males used more Viagra than any other country. Pzfizer’s numbers don’t lie.

      As far as trashing NOCIRC, I’d rather read their site, than Circ List, where pictures of kids being cut are celebrated as something other than horrific.

      I don’t feel bad about my dick. I’m glad I was circ’ed. Cut meat looks better, smells better, and hence, tastes better.

      Bizarre.

      How does ass look, smell and taste, Gabe? You have no problem burying your face in a man’s ass, but get your panties in a knot over a foreskin?

      What I don’t appreciate are assholes using Queerty or other forums to spout off garbage about their own pet issues.

      And what I don’t like are punks trying to act like men, when it’s apparent they are merely children in a man’s world.

      Insulting me isn’t questioning my beliefs.

      You started with the insults, asswipe. Trying to dictate what will and will not be talked about here, demanding that I shut the fuck up.

      You’re posting emotional, hysterical bullshit.

      I’m posting facts and you’re posting pathetic replies that say nothing, Gabriel.

      Science isn’t on your side so that’s what you’re left with.

      Science is on my side–popularism is on your side. The same type of populist, fear mongering that stole equality from Californians, is being used to frighten African men and women into choosing cosmetic surgery, over common sense. Circs have done wonders to save Americans from HIV, just imagine how well it will work in Africa.

      You’re just repeating the same tired half-truths and outright lies of the anti-circumcision bandwagon and creating some of your own. It’s pathetic.

      You have yet to disprove what I’ve presented here, asshole. Nothing but your ill-informed opinion and “me too-ism.”

      Fuck off and come back when you have something intelligent to say, punk.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Btw, Paulie, I think it’s time to prepare your “closing arguments”. This has gone on way too long for such a silly topic.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      No. It’s not.

      Yes it is.

      This whole argument is about aesthetics.

      So why did you bring up sexuality in an attempt to shore up your argument?

      I said that I didn’t find uncut penises appealing, meaning aesthetically.

      And you tried to defend that by comparing a straight man’s non existent desire for anal sex, with the aesthetics of the penis.

      I said nothing about what I found sexually pleasing, pleasing to the taste, touch, nose, etc. That was closer to your own angle, not mine.

      You’ve stated you’ve “seen” many uncut cocks and that is what you’ve based how you will govern your entire life and your relationships from here on in and I pointed out that that is absurd.

      So, obviously, that means that I haven’t?

      You tell us.

      I most certainly did not divulge all of my tastes or dislikes in that convo or any other on this forum + I’d appreciate it if you’d stop bullshitting me + the rest of Queerty about what I said/did.

      Of course you did. You made it abundantly clear that you do not approve of uncut men. To claim your wrote otherwise is disingenuous.

      And I suggest that you stop talking out of your ass.

      I figured I should use a language you’d understand.

      I remember making a passing comment or two about not appreciating the tone of the “Ebonics”-speak being used in the thread + you elevated it into some drawn-out verbal brouhaha, much as you did today over what should have been a brief exchange of comments about a totally frivolous topic.

      You had a conniption fit, Fredo. You took a one paragraph comment I wrote and turned it into Selma, for Christ’s sake. It became drawn out, because every time I responded to one of your caustic replies, you came back more belligerent.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Real Princess
      Real Princess

      oh! my god!A prince peeing in public.What is silly willy upto?.

      Does the world still have a place for something called decency?. Well! Is he trying to prove the world what all guys have in common????????????????.

      Somethings never change.Will it?.

      Oh!No…………….

      Nov 23, 2008 at 10:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      My closing arguments?

      This was for every young gay man who had to tolerate the catty, bitchy comments from prissy queens, who mistook cruelty for wit.

      For every man who has been accused of being “cheesy,” or smelly.

      For every guy who has been accused of being too quick, by men who take hours to have an orgasm, or can’t even get it up.

      For all the men who has been chastised by men who claim to favor La Différence, but in reality cling to the status quo and common place with a tenacity that would make James Dobson proud.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:00 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      “So why did you bring up sexuality in an attempt to shore up your argument?”

      Because one silly argument deserved another.

      “…and that is what you’ve based how you will govern your entire life and your relationships from here on in…”

      Are you high?

      “You made it abundantly clear that you do not approve of uncut men. To claim your (sic) wrote otherwise is disingenuous.”

      How, exactly, is that the same as divulging everything that I find attractive or unattractive? Right…

      “You had a conniption fit, Fredo.”

      Nope. More lies.

      And I’m giving my closing argument after you go. Let’s hear it, Walnuts.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:02 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      This was for all those who realize that a dick is a dick is a dick, but some might be a little tastier than others. To the eye as well as to the tongue.

      And for those who realize that celebrating differences doesn’t mean that we have to deny our own personal tastes or preferences.

      We in the Circ Set might not be popular for our tastes + you might even call us assholes or dicks. To that we reply with a wink + no apologies, “you are what you eat”.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      Because one silly argument deserved another.

      I’m just following your suit, Fredo.

      Are you high?

      You seem pretty adamant about excluding intact males from your dating pool. Just don’t travel outside of America, you’re going to be pretty lonely.

      How, exactly, is that the same as divulging everything that I find attractive or unattractive? Right…

      Well, we’ve covered status, hair colour, skin colour and race. Outside of emotional ties, what else is there?

      Nope. More lies.

      If that’s how you want to see it, sunshine.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:09 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Paul Raposo
      Paul Raposo

      @fredo777:

      “you are what you eat”.

      Meh. I used that line on Queerty years ago, when you were just a glimmer in your daddy’s eye and it already had whiskers on it then. I’ll have to mark you down for lack of originality. It’s certainly no Hot, creamy…

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:18 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Paul Raposo:

      Oh, please.

      I’ve heard that line plenty of times. I wasn’t going for originality, just propriety. It was an appropriate line for what I wanted to say.

      And “Hot, creamy…”? Is that what passes for creative writing ’round these hurr parts?

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      Btw, it’s bad taste to comment on your opponent’s closing arguments. That’s why they’re “closing arguments”, because they effectively “close” the “argument”.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:23 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • egghead
      egghead

      i’ve been reading this post all day. i must say it’s a brilliant reminder of why i hate gays. the happiest day of my life, was the day i walked away from the gay “community” and became celibate. same sex relationships are beautiful, but how gays interact and associate with each other is poison. and you wonder why we lost prop 8.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @egghead:

      Feh.

      If persons like yourself think we should be denied equal rights based on a few arguments, I don’t think we lost much when you “walked away” from the community.

      Nov 23, 2008 at 11:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • ioni
      ioni

      @egghead: Nicely said, eddhead!
      But whatever is inside the community shall no diminish us for waht we are. Celibate put aside, you still are gay. Just get over it :)

      And although without your permission, dear Queerty, but with a backlink I have posted the same on my blog :)

      http://sunshine.by/interesnosti/chlen-korolevskoj-familii-zastignut-vrasplox-20081123/

      Nov 24, 2008 at 4:06 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • AnswerGuru
      AnswerGuru

      Poor guy, I do pity the moment in which he decided he can’t hold it anymore! I bet he thinks twice now… I bet he only pees inside actually! :)

      Nov 24, 2008 at 8:28 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sperm Bank Collections Dept.
      Sperm Bank Collections Dept.

      Anyone who is stupid enough to believe that circumcision prevents HIV deserves to get HIV. The United States has a 77% circumcision rate and has THE HIGHEST HIV RATE for a 1st world country.
      To the total idiots who think mutilating penises will prevent HIV: A NATURAL WETNESS PRODUCED BY THE FORESKIN CONTAINS LYSOZYME WHICH CAN KILL HIV.

      The UN is a bunch of bureaucratic ignoramuses who don’t know the difference between a foreskin and the pucker of an anus.

      Nov 24, 2008 at 10:48 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rob Moore
      Rob Moore

      @fredo777: I know the difference. I was circumcised at 17 under pessure from my American father. The difference is remarkable. I regretted it almost immediately.

      We have all met men whose circumcisions were botched leaving them injuries ranging from unusual scarring to partial amputation of the glans. A story which broke shortly before my son was born at the same hospital had not one but two infant boys whose penises had to be removed after the electic scalpel malfunctioned.

      I worked for several years as an x-ray tech. On some of my trips to x-ray sick newborns, I saw several circumcisions being performed. It was done without local anaesthetic and the babies were screaming, not crying. There was a great deal more blood than one might expect.

      As for the protection from HIV, it does provide some measurable decrease in rates of infection for unprotected sex. Less than 25% though. It simply adds a couple more empty chambers to the HIV gun in Russian roulette. In Africa it is being used to try to reduce infection from refusal to use condoms. Seems like pissing on a tree to put out a forest fire to me.

      Nov 24, 2008 at 5:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Noble woman
      Noble woman

      Dick head!

      Is their any lack of toilet facillities for the mighty royals?.

      This is the most disgusting behaviour i have ever seen coming out of one of the future heirs of england.

      little Boy! got to learn a lesson about three.

      Nov 24, 2008 at 10:22 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Rob Moore:

      Feh.

      I’m sure you would know the difference having been circed @ 17 yrs. old.

      I’m talking about newborns, obviously.

      Nov 24, 2008 at 11:17 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sperm Bank Collections Dept.
      Sperm Bank Collections Dept.

      @fredo777:
      Circing a newborn is sexual assault on a child,and forced amputation of a fully functioning body part without consent.
      And the same punishment for child sexual assault should be given to the doctors and parents who do such a horrid thing to a child. And victims should sue for the unimaginable amount of money that doctors make by selling foreskins to pharmacutical and make-up companies.

      Nov 24, 2008 at 11:53 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • fredo777
      fredo777

      @Sperm Bank Collections Dept.:

      Meh.

      Nov 24, 2008 at 11:59 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jimmy
      Jimmy

      Yummy. Can one lick it? :P

      Nov 28, 2008 at 10:30 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Caio
      Caio

      Discussing what I like, I suck at real

      Dec 9, 2008 at 12:33 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Juan
      Juan

      @michael: I never heard before that Prince William Pop was hung? When? Where? I would like to see it!!

      Dec 29, 2008 at 4:21 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • dubie
      dubie

      I think it is just lovely to view a royal prick

      Sep 19, 2010 at 5:19 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Rob Moore
      Rob Moore

      @dubie: You sound like my late grandmother. She was rigidly republican and might have cheered had a mob taken the royal family to the guillotine. For some reason Prince Philip in particular raised her hackles. My mother, her daughter, was just as strongly pro-monarchy.

      Sep 20, 2010 at 3:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • alli1985
      alli1985

      I have slept with maybe 7 guys, I live in the US, never came accross
      an uncut guy. I think looks better, none of my gf have
      also came across an uncut guy. When I was I’m the military and
      they asked if there was anyone uncut, out of my battalion of over 300
      Marines, not one person was. They wanted them to get circumsised we had
      A ssgt who has been deployed before who who was previously uncut
      And he got a nasty infection in the field. In the US it’s the
      norm to be cut. I think it’s more sanitary guys are pretty dirty to start off with

      Aug 24, 2012 at 8:31 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • captty1701
      captty1701

      I LOVE his dick!!!!

      Sep 23, 2012 at 3:26 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    !-- Sailthru Horizon -->
    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.