Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
  anticipation

Prop 8 Perry Trial Decision Coming Imminently? Is Judge Walker Even Around? Nah

Well if the DOMA ruling wasn’t enough news today, how about this: Judge Vaughn Walker will release his decision in the federal Prop 8 trial, Perry v. Schwarzenegger, at 6pm PST/9pm EST, say LOTS OF SOURCES ON THE INTERNET. Except: Is Judge Walker even around? Nobody is picking up the phones at the courts, and according to the courts’ website:

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY:
JUDGE WALKER WILL BE UNAVAILABLE DURING THIS PERIOD:
JULY 8 and 9, 2010
AUGUST 16 through AUGUST 20, 2010
OCTOBER 11 through OCTOBER 15, 2010

If not, well, I’m still in a good mood otherwise.


  • 17 Comments
    • Sean
      Sean

      At the same time as Lebron’s decision? Why?!!! America is going to be transfixed on that instead. VERY bad move. Just wait an hour! Or til tomorrow!

      Jul 8, 2010 at 8:43 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • D'oh, The Magnificent
      D'oh, The Magnificent

      Uhm, no perfect. The bigots need to make a splash of this. We just need the rights.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 8:47 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Sean
      Sean

      @D’oh, The Magnificent: No, we need to make a splash too.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 8:48 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • concernedcitizen
      concernedcitizen

      Trust me @Sean this decision coupled with the recent DOMA decision I have a feeling will make a HUGE SPLASH, I can’t wait, I may even watch Fixed News to see how peeved they get!!! I’d love to see Megyn Kelly brain implode!!!!!

      Jul 8, 2010 at 8:52 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Steveo
      Steveo

      So did they announce a decision?

      Jul 8, 2010 at 9:29 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Steveo
      Steveo

      This just in: All the buzz was just a false alarm. No decision tonight.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 9:39 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • james_from_the_great_city_of_cambridge
      james_from_the_great_city_of_cambridge

      @Steveo: Wha’? Drudge posted something that wasn’t true?? I’m getting the vapors *faints dead*!!

      Jul 8, 2010 at 9:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • concernedcitizen
      concernedcitizen

      Queerty urgh you tricked me you bastards!!!!! : )

      Jul 8, 2010 at 9:42 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • D'oh, The Magnificent
      D'oh, The Magnificent

      @Sean: Part of the issue with the gay rights movement is that for some of you – you really have no idea what this is about. No, its not about making a splash and getting back at all those people who treated you wrong for being gay in the past. Its about making sure that we have equality by any means necessary.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 9:56 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Devon
      Devon

      @james_from_the_great_city_of_cambridge:

      In other news, the ocean is wet.

      More on this at 11.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 10:34 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Republican
      Republican

      Drudge wasn’t the only one. The Advocate on its twitter account was saying that several sources were reporting the news. Hmm.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 10:38 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Soakman
      Soakman

      @D’OH, I think you’re wrong. How do you propose we attain true equality with no visibility?

      Our bigoted American brothers and sisters need to know that they are wrong; it’s not about us quietly sitting at our country’s feet while we wait for it to slyly drop us the anticipated crumbs of acceptance.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 10:40 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Republican
      Republican

      @james_from_the_great_city_of_cambridge:

      I hate to defend Drudge, but word is that the judge might have delayed his decision due to the verdict in the Oakland trial and related concerns with the BART system and rioting. Guess we’ll find out tomorrow if that’s true.

      Jul 8, 2010 at 10:45 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Delerious hilarity
      Delerious hilarity

      Have I mentioned on this thread that I come from a wealthy family?

      Jul 8, 2010 at 10:55 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Lamar
      Lamar

      Maybe he just doesn’t want the media bothering him so they can get the scoop first and report it early which would look embarrassing.

      Jul 9, 2010 at 4:10 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Zach
      Zach

      @Soakman:

      Ideally, you attain visibility after you win the rights and have them secured, not when they can be challenged and legislated against. Making a “splash” is a call to arms, and in case you haven’t noticed, outside the judicial sphere, you’re not doing all that well. Take it to the people on any gay rights issue and you’ll lose, almost every time. Take it to them on gay marriage, and you lose every time. And if there are enough angry theocrats breathing down their necks, almost any legislative moderate will cave and vote your rights away.

      Jul 9, 2010 at 5:40 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Jonathan
      Jonathan

      I would think Drudge would have a personal stake in this ruling – after all, he’s queer, too. (Although he doesn’t admit it, everyone else knows…)

      Jul 10, 2010 at 3:24 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.