Recently Commented

Warning: include(/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/crime/duke-lax-rape-suspect-now-guilty-of-antigay-assault-20060713.php on line 105

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/crime/duke-lax-rape-suspect-now-guilty-of-antigay-assault-20060713.php on line 105

RSS

Colophon

David Hauslaib
Editorial Director
David Hauslaib | Email

Andrew Belonsky
Editor
Andrew Belonsky | Email

Jossip
Publisher
Jossip Initiatives

— Thu, Jul 13, 2006 —
Duke LAX Rape Suspect Now Guilty of Anti-Gay Assault

Collin Finnerty's parents must be so proud. Not only is the 19-year-old embroiled in the Duke lacrosse rape scandal but this week he was convicted of a misdemeanor stemming from an anti-gay assault last year. The New Yorker's two day trial ended in a sentence of six months probation. Finnerty was charged with instigating the assault of two gay men at a bar in November, throwing homophobic slurs around while pretending to punch the men. It was Finnerty's two friends who did the actual throwing down, but those two are off the hook thanks to a first-time offenders program.

Finnerty Convicted in Georgetown Assault Case [AP]

Comments


No. 1
NOITEMPLE15 says:

This lecture by Minister Eric Muhammad speaks powerfully to the Duke rape case and places it within the larger context of America’s race problem.

It has been removed by THE WHITE MAN due to, we assume, the number of people downloading it and complaints concerning it. We do not know how long it will take for them to delete it again. Get it while you can.

THE BLACK…WHITE…PROBLEM IN AMERICA 4/16/06

THIS LECTURE IS 5.90MB IN SIZE. WITH HIGH SPEED INTERNET, IT WILL TAKE ONLY SECONDS TO DOWNLOAD. WITH DIAL-UP IT COULD TAKE UP TO AN HOUR.

CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO BEGIN DOWNLOAD.

http://www.zshare.net/download/the-black-white-problem-in-america-4-16-06-wma.html

MUHAMMAD’S TEMPLE # 15

ATLANTA, GA.

July 13, 2006 5:15 PM
No. 2
Kenneth says:

I don't think the victim in this case was even gay, I think these idiots were just calling him "faggot" and such in the generic insult kind of way.

While I'm happy he's been prosecuted for his involvement -- whether the victim was gay or not -- I do have a problem with "fruit of the poisonous tree" (no pun intended) aspect of this, because the only reason the charges were reinstated is because he "violated his parole" by getting in "trouble" again -- even though all experts involved in the Duke rape case say it's a bogus claim.

It just doesn't seem right that he's being punished as a result of something he didn't do instead of just being punished for something he did.

July 13, 2006 7:22 PM
No. 3
Betty says:

The stripper who lied about being raped hurt so many innocent men.

Stripper possibly made a false claim of rape by three boys in 1996.

Stripper made a false claim of kidnapping in 1998

Stripper charged with larceny, auto theft, and trying to kill a police officer in 2002

The entire lacrosse team cooperated completely with the police investigation.

1st round of DNA shows no link to the lacrosse team.

2nd round of DNA shows no link to the lacrosse team

DNA proves stripper had sex with boyfriend/pimp and two other men, and paying “client”, and a battery vaginal sex toy before going to the party, which accounts for the “rape kit” evidence of recent sexual activity.

The bathroom is absolutely and completely devoid of any evidence of a rape. Where is her DNA? Urine, blood, vaginal fluid, saliva, or tears?

Many people’s DNA were found under her nails but none from the innocent lacrosse boys. The only DNA that has a partial link to one of the boys was found on the top surface of the fake nail.

She lied about losing her fake finger nails in a desperate struggle in the small enclosed bathroom, but pictures show that she removed her nails before inadequately performing her routine. No scratches were found on any of the innocent lacrosse boys’ bodies. No DNA of any lacrosse boy was found under her nails.

The 2 innocent boys she “eeny meeny miney moed” to be her rapists weren’t even at the party the time she claimed the rape occurred. She claims that she’s 100% sure, but she told her father that she’s not sure.

The stripper was in the process of being arrested when she created the rape lie as an alibi to stay out of jail

Nifong claimed a rape drug could have been used, but now we know that a tox screen was never done and Nifong made the rape drug lie up.

The DA is trying to suppress the stripper’s cell phone which may contain records of her being on the phone at the time she claimed she was suppose to be being raped by boys who weren’t even there.

Now it’s found that the stripper was on the cell phone at the time she claimed she was raped.

July 15, 2006 12:07 AM
No. 4
Jelena says:

Betty, really she was on the phone?!!? WOW! Now it's even more obvious that this is a crock of shit. Just like the other stripper said so.

July 23, 2006 9:16 PM

Post Your Comments





Note: It may take up to a minute for your comments submission to be processed. Please do not click "Post" more than once, or your comments may be duplicated.



Email This Post

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Advertisement
Welcome to Queerty. The gay blog.

Email your editors!
holla@queerty.com

Stereohyped

Promotion

Advertise on Queerty

Site Map