



If you're up on your gay blogs you probably already caught the news that gay—er, "men who have sex with men" are five times more likely to contract HIV if they use meth. Of course, even if you're not up on your gay blogs you shouldn't be too surprised to hear the news. Some gay sites were leading with this story today, but we held off because we know you're smart like that...
at the very least, we hope you're smart enough to know that drugs are bad (mm-kay?), but who doesn't know that?
But, in essence, isn't that basically what this study—and all the studies like it and all the news bits reporting on those studies again and again—is doing? Our humble opinion is that the meth mess is more a problem of rampant—and dangerous—self-medication by a segment of our community who feels too exiled from homophobic society to seek out beneficial help. But what do we know? We're no doctors.
It is quite possible that these statistics are skewed in order to frighten gay men. A drug user is in the high risk category to contract HIV. The fact that they may be gay could be irrelevant to the exposure to the virus. What has to be seperated in these studys is the behavior that is allowing these men to contract the virus. If the behavior is IV drug use and they are contracting the virus through dirty needles versus contracting it through unsafe sex then they should not be categorized as gay.
im an academic, so i read this stuff all the time, old news
consistently, research has shown that gay/bi/whatever men who use crystal are MUCH more likely to report unsafe sex...
but does the meth "turn off their judgment" OR does everyone wind up having unsafe sex because they hear thats what happens on meth (this way you can say 'oh the drugs made me do it')