Recently Commented

Warning: include(/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/gay-marriage/if-the-gays-would-just-stop-being-gay-they-could-get-married-20060817.php on line 105

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/gay-marriage/if-the-gays-would-just-stop-being-gay-they-could-get-married-20060817.php on line 105

RSS

Colophon

David Hauslaib
Editorial Director
David Hauslaib | Email

Andrew Belonsky
Editor
Andrew Belonsky | Email

Jossip
Publisher
Jossip Initiatives

— Thu, Aug 17, 2006 —
If the Gays Would Just Stop Being Gay, They Could Get Married

Here's a new analogy about gay marriage we hadn't heard before:

When the law permits automobiles to drive on highways but forbids bicycles from doing the same, that is not discrimination against people. A cyclist who gets off his bicycle and gets into a car can drive on the highway just like anyone else.

That comes from the Baltimore Sun's op-ed columnist Thomas Sowell. Are we wrong in equating Sowell's oversimplication with this parallel analogy: "A gay person who stops having relationships with men and gets on the bandwagon with the straights can get married just like anyone else." The column is worth reading — as a case study in flawed reasoning.

Gay-marriage advocates ignore history, reality [Baltimore Sun]

Comments


No. 1
Hetro is Over Rated says:

Well good, this confirms my theory...straight people ARE retarded.

August 17, 2006 3:11 PM
No. 2
Ernesto says:

After reading it, I cant help but compare this article to a college essay written last minute by a procrastinator who didnt read the book but instead, just took snippets from it by randomly opening pages. Basically an "F" essay full of loopholes and b.s.

August 17, 2006 3:33 PM
No. 3
Jennifer says:

I've written the Sun a letter. They not only printed that rubbish. They actually have a weekly column from this numbnuts. Everybody write a letter. That's a guy that doesn't have anything of interest to say and shouldn't be disseminated any further than the flyblown pages of his journal. Honestly.

August 17, 2006 3:39 PM
No. 4
BCM says:

Equal opportunity and affirmative action laws require that a certain number of writings by African-American Republicans be published. This is part of that quota.

There is a nucleus of a point in there somewhere. Marriage is a straight institution. The argument should be about why the state confers certain automatic privileges and responsibilities to married straight persons, and not to registered, committed gay partners. Defining gay partnerships as "marriage" is a shortcut around that argument, and it largely hasn't worked.

Marriage is a religious concept that has been adopted by the state to the extent that it provides mechanisms allowing people to marry even outside any religious institution. Given that some churches do officially recognize gay commitments, the question needs to be pressed as to why the state does not recognize such and also provide a mechanism for gay couples to commit outside a church. "Strict constructionists" need to be asked why they believe the Constitution permits the government to prefer the beliefs of one set of churches and ignore the beliefs of other churches.

August 17, 2006 6:21 PM
No. 5
Hephaestion says:

Write a letter to the editor of the Baltimore Sun at:
letters@baltsun.com

That Thomas Sowell has no business spreading his slime on the fine soil of funky Baltimore. He needs to move to Virginia with dumbass attitudes like his.

August 17, 2006 7:42 PM
No. 6
Lyle says:

My favorite response to this rationalization was a guy who essentially said "Fine, how about we start marrying straight women, as you suggest? I'm sure a guy who understands the importance of a new and pretty dress and doesn't need to be forced into watching Lifetime movies together can offer any competition. Sure, we can't offer sex, but we're talking marriage here -- which factor is more important in the long term?"

August 18, 2006 12:31 PM
No. 7
Scott Rose says:

The bicycle/motor car analogy was not a good one because a straight relationship is not to a gay relationship what a car is to a bicycle.

However, one can meaningfully talk about the difference between columnists who write before pulling their heads out of their asses and those who wait to write until they have pulled their heads out of their asses. Clearly, with the shit he wrote, this jerk still had his head up his ass. H

August 18, 2006 2:22 PM
No. 8
Malcontent says:

When did logic ever matter to gay-marriage opponents?

August 18, 2006 2:48 PM

Post Your Comments





Note: It may take up to a minute for your comments submission to be processed. Please do not click "Post" more than once, or your comments may be duplicated.



Email This Post

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Advertisement
Welcome to Queerty. The gay blog.

Email your editors!
holla@queerty.com

Stereohyped

Promotion

Advertise on Queerty

Site Map