Warning: include(/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/morning-goods/morning-goods-daniel-erthal-20070330.php on line 105
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/morning-goods/morning-goods-daniel-erthal-20070330.php on line 105
Hrm. He's not bad, but what's with all the hairless twinks on steroids? Can we see a real man for a change? And no, I don't mean some overweight bear. I just mean a guy who looks like a guy, not a 16 year old who waxes every inch of his body and has a bad Greg Brady haircut.
If I want profound, I'll read Aristotle. When I want hot, I want superficial. I LOVE the neo-Beatles haircut, the waxed, toned physique, the come-hither look, the "I'm barely 18" younglish fakery1
I never said I wanted something profound, just something that looks a little more "color found in nature." Now, I'm sure we could get into a big long discussion about everyone being a big rainbow of likes and personal tastes and "when I look at porn, I want BIG and NO FAT and SWEATY MANCOCK." I could then make some big, long-winded speech about how the fashion industry is fucking with our minds and how gay men are the most retarded species on this planet, especially when it comes to this weird pederast-esque sexual vibe "we" all seem to want to project.
You're right, Rowen, because someone could argue rigth back that the fashion industry is only responding to what people intuitively find hot. It's an old argument: Is there some Platonic ideal of "hot" or do we have the notion of "hot" imposed on us? I'd argue the former; you, the latter. Not sure either one of us would "win." What I will say is that my "ideal" goes back a lot further than yours.
April 2, 2007 1:25 PM
Post Your Comments
Note: It may take up to a minute for your comments submission to be processed. Please do not click "Post" more than once, or your comments may be duplicated.
Warning: include(/home/queerty/public_html/ad_network_370.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/queerty/public_html/assets/sidebar_footer_pages.php on line 70
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/queerty/public_html/ad_network_370.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/queerty/public_html/assets/sidebar_footer_pages.php on line 70 Put your ad here
Damn.
In the first picture, I thought he looked kinda like Brad Pitt. He's hot hot hot.
God almighty.
Certainly wouldn't kick him out of my bed.
Holy hell. That is one hot man.
Hrm. He's not bad, but what's with all the hairless twinks on steroids? Can we see a real man for a change? And no, I don't mean some overweight bear. I just mean a guy who looks like a guy, not a 16 year old who waxes every inch of his body and has a bad Greg Brady haircut.
agree with rowen.. this man daniel sure is pretty (& plus point for youth) .. but its all superficial..
I am not a fan of the crustache.
If I want profound, I'll read Aristotle. When I want hot, I want superficial. I LOVE the neo-Beatles haircut, the waxed, toned physique, the come-hither look, the "I'm barely 18" younglish fakery1
I never said I wanted something profound, just something that looks a little more "color found in nature." Now, I'm sure we could get into a big long discussion about everyone being a big rainbow of likes and personal tastes and "when I look at porn, I want BIG and NO FAT and SWEATY MANCOCK." I could then make some big, long-winded speech about how the fashion industry is fucking with our minds and how gay men are the most retarded species on this planet, especially when it comes to this weird pederast-esque sexual vibe "we" all seem to want to project.
But I really don't care, and it's late.
You're right, Rowen, because someone could argue rigth back that the fashion industry is only responding to what people intuitively find hot. It's an old argument: Is there some Platonic ideal of "hot" or do we have the notion of "hot" imposed on us? I'd argue the former; you, the latter. Not sure either one of us would "win." What I will say is that my "ideal" goes back a lot further than yours.