Recently Commented

Warning: include(/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/news/tranny-injustice-20061219.php on line 105

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '/home/queerty/public_html/commented.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/queerty/public_html/queer/news/tranny-injustice-20061219.php on line 105

RSS

Colophon

David Hauslaib
Editorial Director
David Hauslaib | Email

Andrew Belonsky
Editor
Andrew Belonsky | Email

Jossip
Publisher
Jossip Initiatives

— Tue, Dec 19, 2006 —
Tranny Injustice!
Girl Just Wanted A Cute Shirt and Got a Lawsuit, Instead

galla.jpg
A reader sent us this story last night and we thought we'd pass it along to you. It seems a transgender woman named Jane Galla popped into discount store Loehmann's for a bit of shopping.

Picking out some choice items for the warmer months, Galla asked for a fitting room. And guess what - employees wouldn't let her in. Outrageous!

She tells New York CBS affiliate WCBS:

I picked out a couple of casual tops for the summer and spring season, and I just wanted to try them out... I felt humiliated, embarrassed.
Girl should feel more embarrassed for shopping at Loehmann's. Come on, Galla, we know a steel guitarist from Brooklyn doesn't make mad money, but we bet you could find even cuter things at Uniqlo or Century 21, minus the cuntiness.

One would think Galla would have learned her lesson - a previous trip to the Chelsea outfitter turned ugly when employees told her she couldn't use the women's bathroom.

I was in the area where you fix your make-up and whatnot, and we were discussing fashions, and someone from the staff from Loehmann's [said I] shouldn't use the ladies room.
Absolutely barbaric, especially considering that New York City has anti-discrimination laws for this very purpose.

With no other recourse, Galla called her lawyer and hopes Loehmann's will implement some more trans-friendly policies. How altruistic. We'd go for the jugular and file a class-action lawsuit.

While legal methods are all well and good, perhaps Galla would do better to rally all the trannies, drag queens and just plain homos of Chelsea and picket outside. At the very least she can cruise some cute rubber neckers. And, really, isn't that what protest is all about? Well, that and social justice - a close second.

(PS: Sorry for the shoddy pictures - it's all we could find. CBS has video, though. She's quite a fetching woman, that Jane Galla.)

Comments


No. 1
Matt says:

I'm sorry and I feel for him but he needs to use a male restroom. He has a penis and his chromosomes are that of a male. I wouldn't want a female to male transgendered person in the men's restroom while I was in there. It makes people uncomfortable. The only way he should be let in there is if the state has legally declared him a female. Then by all means he should have access to these facilities.

December 19, 2006 9:12 AM
No. 2
no biggie says:

i don't see what the big deal is, as long as she puts the seat down when she's finished, i'm all set.

December 19, 2006 10:19 AM
No. 3
kizmet says:

No, she doesn't need to use a male restroom. The law is quite clear, if someone identifies as female they use the female facilities whether or not they are still physically male. And that's the way it should be, if you're uncomfortable that's your problem and you need to get over it.

December 19, 2006 10:32 AM
No. 4
Chris says:

Matt, you *really* need to educate yourself on transgender issues a bit.

December 19, 2006 10:40 AM
No. 5
Matt says:

Okay Chris I will. Now that I further looked into this issue, I have discovered that Transgendered people are defined as a gender issues and not a sexual orientation issue. Since this is a gay blog and being gay is a sexual orientation issue and not a gender one then this article *really* shouldn't have been posted here. Chris you say I need to educate myself on transgendered issues. Why? I'm not transgendered and I don't know anyone who is so why should I care. I just stated my opinion. If the law allows them such priveleges, I'm all for it. If not then I'm against it. It makes no difference to me.

December 19, 2006 10:51 AM
No. 6
common sense says:

hey- as long as the law doesn't affect you then why care right?
so if the law says you can't marry your partner, then you're all for it??

and while i think this blog is titled as a gay blog, it encompasses the whole GLBT crowd.

December 19, 2006 11:49 AM
No. 7
Matt says:

I have no problem with not being able to marry. I seriously could never see myself wanting to have a wedding ceremony with another man. Sounds like a back log of divorces if you ask me.

December 19, 2006 12:44 PM
No. 8
Autumn Sandeen says:

Eleanor Roosevelt commented on social justice in this quote:

Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home-so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any map of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person: The neighbourhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world.

And the reason you should care about other minorities besides gays, Matt, is found in an MLK Jr. quote:

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
December 19, 2006 12:54 PM
No. 9
kizmet says:

Because everything is about you, right, Matt? Because you don't think you'd want to marry, you don't give a fuck if everyone else can. Nice.

December 19, 2006 2:23 PM
No. 10
Chris says:

Love how Matt thinks he learned everything there is to know about gender identity, sexual orientation, and the connections between discrimination on the basis of either in the 11 minutes between my comment and his response.

I tried to post a comment earlier that included links to several webpages that articulate some of the reasons why gay, lesbian, and bisexual people should care about transgender rights, but for some reason my comment wouldn't post. But given the whole "if it doesn't affect me directly, then I don't care and don't want to hear about it" attitude, I doubt any of those arguments would sink in anyway.

December 19, 2006 3:05 PM

Post Your Comments





Note: It may take up to a minute for your comments submission to be processed. Please do not click "Post" more than once, or your comments may be duplicated.



Email This Post

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


Advertisement
Welcome to Queerty. The gay blog.

Email your editors!
holla@queerty.com

Stereohyped

Promotion

Advertise on Queerty

Site Map