If there's one thing that supporters of the proposed anti-marriage amendment in Wisconsin hate more than anything, it's information. An ignorant populace is one that can be easily manipulated at the polls, and Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager (pictured) has provided voters with a bit too much information for the liking of the religious right: basically a brief definition of what the amendment would actually do.

Amendment supporters are upset because they believe that policy should be voted upon based solely on the name of the initiative (e.g., the "Blue Skies Plan", the "Healthy Forests Initiative", "Mission: Accomplished"). They can't very well use the proposed "Happy Gays Amendment" title that they had been planning on now that Attorney General Lautenschlager has made it clear the proposed amendment could affect the domestic partnership rights of all unmarried Wisconsinites, gay or straight.

Wisconsin AG Under Fire For Amendment Definition [365 Gay]