Queerty is better as a member

Log in | Register
 

Richardson’s Gay Choice Explanation Train Chugs On

022107richardson.jpg
Bill Richardson had loads of explaining to do after his gay forum slip up. For those of you not paying attention – shame, shame, shame! – Richardson “misunderstood” Melissa Etheridge’s “science” question. This “confusion” led Richardson to intimate that homosexuality’s a “choice”.

Richardson quickly clarified his position, but that didn’t stop us from giving him a bit of a grilling. Michelangelo Signorile also took some time to probe the Democratic presidential hopeful’s queer choice of words. Give Signorile’s radio show a listen here and here. And, for those of you wanting more blood shed, read Richardson’s chat with our friend Kerry Eleveld over at The Advocate.

By:           Andrew Belonksy
On:           Aug 13, 2007
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

  • 7 Comments
    • Martini-boy
      Martini-boy

      As a Canadian cit, I can honestly say I don’t like this dude. He seems rather shifty, and he STILL can’t explain why he is so adamant on stopping short at civil unions.

      If, as he insinuates, it’s for the sake of getting him into office NOW, and to achieve something ‘marriage-like-but-not-quite’ now, then sure that’s fine. But this won’t really serve anyone other than himself unless he can promise to upgrade these civil unions to full-on marriage in later years.

      In any case, I don’t think he has a chance.

      Aug 13, 2007 at 10:35 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • WWH
      WWH

      Whether its a choice or not, and for some whos sexuality lies in the middle it may be, has no bearing whatsoever on whethter we deserve equal rights under the law.

      Aug 13, 2007 at 10:48 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Will
      Will

      Totally agree with WWH. I don’t like everything about Richardson, but I could care less if he thinks homosexuality is a choice or not. As long as he isn’t using the rhetoric of “choice” to deny GLBTI people rights, it doesn’t really matter how he thinks about us. He has a decent record, better than some others that are getting far less scrutiny.

      Aug 13, 2007 at 11:31 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • nycstudman
      nycstudman

      He makes one tiny slip, apologizes, recants, reflects, gets on his knees, and you won’t let it go? let it go already!

      Aug 13, 2007 at 1:15 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Graywolf48
      Graywolf48

      I don’t think Richardson is a bad man. He screwed up with the choice comment and blew it with the maricon comment and looked totally uncomfortable at the “gay debate”. But, looking at his record on gay issues tells me he’s a lot better than the majority of Presidential wannabe’s out there, including Hillary. I think he’s right about the civil unions, that’s doable; marriage, not so much. Not now. Not yet. I’m willing to give him a pass. But, the reality is, he has no chance at getting the nomination, so it’s all just academic isn’t it?

      Aug 13, 2007 at 1:28 pm · @ReplyReply to this comment ·
    • Mitch
      Mitch

      I think you should read what Barney Frank has to say on this: http://www.queerty.com/news/gay-politico-barney-frank-accepts-bill-richardsons-apology-20070814/

      Especially worth noting: It is especially relevant that he voted consistently on our side from the start of his Congressional career in the 1980s, when the issue of LGBT rights had far less support even from Democrats that it has today.

      Richardson has my full support, he’s a much better and more qualified candidate than Obama or Clinton.

      Nov 14, 2007 at 11:36 am · @ReplyReply to this comment ·

    Add your Comment

    Please log in to add your comment

    Need an account? Register It's free and easy.



  • POPULAR ON QUEERTY

    FOLLOW US
     



    GET QUEERTY'S DAILY NEWSLETTER


    FROM AROUND THE WEB

    !-- Sailthru Horizon -->
    Copyright 2014 Queerty, Inc.
    Follow Queerty at Queerty.com, twitter.com/queerty and facebook.com/queerty.