Hunky and perennially gaybaiting Brit-pop star Robbie Williams says that yes, he’d indeed have sex with a man if the price was right—and that price is two million British pounds, or about three million US bucks.
The UK’s Daily Mirror reports that in a two-hour webcast for Williams’ Radio Rudebox, friends of the 37-year-old singer suggested that £5 million might be the going price for Williams to have sex with a man. But the ever-humble—and we suspect, ever-eager—Williams thought £2 million seemed more fair. Unless you’re Brad Pitt, in which case the price goes down. Way down.
“Brad can negotiate,” suggested Robbie. “It’s £2 million for Santa, but it’s a freebie for Brad Pitt.”
On further reflection, Williams added, “How much would I have to pay him?”
Do we smell the blissful beginnings of a brewing Brobbie bromance?
Images via robbiewilliams.com, Rach
$3 million for sex with him? Puhleeze.
Now, maybe $3 million for sex with Chris Pine, or Joe Mauer — those guys are fucking hot but Robbie Williams looks unkempt and dirty.
· Flag
Why are gay men so bitchy? It’s pathetic. He is a public figure telling the world he would have gay sex for free. So what if he is gay or not? Instead of all of you thanking him for not tweeting how he hates femmes all you can do is slam him. Just pathetic.
· Flag
Reminds me of an apocryphal story about Winston Churchill. Supposedly he asked a socialite whether she’d sleep with him for a million pounds. The socialite replied “Well, I’d think that I would, Mr. Churchill.” He then asked if she’d sleep with him for ten pounds, to which she replied “Certainly not, Mr. Churchill. What kind of a woman do you think I am?”
To which Churchill replied “I believe we’ve established that, madam. Now we’re just haggling over the price.”
· Flag
His former manager has already come out and said Williams is gay. I didn’t think that this was still an issue, I thought it was in relation to being closeted explaining why he was always drinking etc…