Ronson Rocks New ‘Do

It looks like Big Bird shit on her head.

haha i totally covered this story two days ago. sloooooowwwwwww

wow, I get the irony in your text Queerety, but you all got to be gagging that you covered this after TMZ. Gee…hire a younger queer editor or drop this silly, fake attitude of being above these stupid stories when you publish them anyway.
Love you, but only LiLo is getting it both ways lately…

Yeah, I understand the Lohan connection makes Sam newsworthy, but I’d rather see stories on her big brother Mark Ronson(who used to sleep over at Michael Jackson’s house when he was a kid).

Pish. For those of us who are repelled by celebrity gossip, but love a good pic of a bad haircut, being two days late and dismissive about this crap is fine by me. Carry on, Queerty.

I rather like her new haircut. It’s better than her previous one, anywho!

I never thought I’d be turned on by lesbians having sex, but the idea of LiLo and Sam going at it is pretty hot.

Whoops, you’re right Trenton. Queerty is Def aiming for the older, slower, Advocate reading homosexual. I mean, they’re not in this for the gay dollar, right?
Maybe Queerty can change their name to ‘Inverty’?

Remember, if you’re not on top, you’re just one of the thousands of bottoms out there. Pish!

now if she would only rock a bra!!!

but i agree- it is better than her previous haircut.

Scooter Bumps, doll, sweetheart…I’m young, my light-reading of choice is Harper’s, and it’s only because I’m capable of doing three things at once that I even have time to look at Queerty, let alone tabloid trash. I really can’t muster an iota of interest in being current on these things…but like I said, a good pic of a bad do is worth a chuckle.

But good job turnng a benign comment in Queerty’s defense into an insinuation unto my character and the character of anyone else who doesn’t give a real damn about LiRon. You obviously have the time to read this “news” on other sites…I guess it should come as no surprise that you have the time to take offense at their being “slow” and snarky about it.

That said, I don’t fault you for your fascination with the subject. So carry on. Just don’t expect everyone else (young or old) to be so ravenous for it.

Trenton, all apologies. Anyone who checks out Harper’s for light reading can’t be all bad. Personally, I thought Gass’ essay on Henry James would have benefited from some editorial distance, but what’cha gonna do? Harper’s doesn’t have a ‘comment’ feature. Hence my appreciation for watching gay sociology skim by my laptop screen.
I stand by the fact that if you are the type of blog that covers lesbian haircuts, cover it first, best and fully. And certainly don’t act as if lesbian haircuts are beneath your editorial ‘dignity’.
And I’m sorry if you somehow took my comment about the monetary motivation of this site as an attack on your character. Nothing could be further from my intent.
Enjoy your Harper’s and the new season of Project Runway. Carry On!

Am I the only one who has noticed that Samantha always has dark circles under eyes and looks dangerously annorexic?

Scooter:

This thread is buied, so I dunno if you’ll read this, but for the heck of it:

I’m leery of James to begin with. I find much of his work overwrought, Portrait being the best and most ironic example considering that he set out to create (and I paraphrase) a living novel, something almost organic. Turn of the Screw was far more successful on that count, and it’s too bad that James disaparaged it so much later in life.

As for Gass, the article certainly rhapsodized James, but not in an overly tacky way. From the title alone, one knows immediately that Gass is quite ethusiastic about his subject, and I love that sort of enthusiasm even if I don’t share it entirely. It made me want to sit across from Gass and let him sing praises to James, mch in the same way I’ll go to certain ligious events just for the pageantry and passion displayed by those involved. Dogmatic passion is a delight to watch, evn if one cannot fully appreciate the intellectual origins of it.

Mmmyep…

ligious = religious, but you probably already caught that.