Be sure to read Stereohyped’s perspective for “the black view.”
Reverend Irene Monroe ain’t no friend of Barack Obama. The black lesbian has come out against the black presidential candidate on more than one occasion. She first blasted the Illinois junior senator back in November, writing:
..[H]is affinity to conservative Christian beliefs not only informs his decision on the issue of marriage equality, but it also solidifies his decision about us in a community of believers like himself.
Though some black churches have lent their support to the lavender cause, the majority still maintain a decidedly repressive approach – an approach Obama maintains.
Obama once told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer:
I think that marriage has a religious connotation in this society, in our culture, that makes it very difficult to disentangle from the civil aspects of marriage. And as a consequence, it would be extraordinarily difficult and a distraction to try to build a consensus around marriage for gays and lesbians. What we can do is form civil unions that provide all the civil rights that marriage entails to same-sex couples. And that is something that I have consistently been in favor of. And I think that the vast majority of Americans don’t want to see gay and lesbian couples discriminated against when it comes to hospital visitation and so on.
The handsome politico also once described the federal marriage amendment as a “political ploy”, telling his Senatorial peers:
How about we take this to the next level?
Our newsletter is like a refreshing cocktail (or mocktail) of LGBTQ+ entertainment and pop culture, served up with a side of eye-candy.
I agree with most Americans, with Democrats and Republicans, with Vice President Cheney, with over 2,000 religious leaders of all different beliefs, that decisions about marriage, as they always have, should be left to the states.
Today, we should take this amendment only for what it is – a political ploy designed to rally a few supporters and draw the country’s attention away from this leadership’s past failures and America’s future challenges.
There is plenty of work to be done in this country. There are millions without health care and skyrocketing gas prices and children in crumbling schools and thousands of young Americans risking their lives in Iraq.
So don’t tell me that this is the best use of our time. Don’t tell me that this is what people want to see talked about on TV and in the newspapers all day. We wonder why the American people have such a low opinion of Washington these days. This is why.
Well, actually, we think people have a low opinion of Washington because its not doing enough to protect its citizens. Yes, a weak health care system and Iraq put us all in danger, but so do discriminatory laws.
Obama’s strident subscription to religious prescription led Monroe to write in The Advocate:
…Obama’s image, standing under a blue neon halo and wearing a robe resembling one worn during Jesus’s era, inspired hope. And for these Americans, Obama is a secular messiah who is believed to have come not only to help the Democratic Party reinvent itself but also rescue a country despised around the world.
…
For other passers-by, just mentioning Obama and Jesus in the same breath is not only blasphemous, but also an offense to their civil rights. And so, too, many argue it would be an offense for Jesus.…[Obama]has opted, like so many religious conservatives, to use religion to justify his discrimination. And that’s an abomination.
Within days of the piece’s publication, the good reverend found herself under fire from her black peers:
I get all these anonymous, threatening calls from folks, saying that they’re going to come after me, I’m a race traitor. They’re not being nice, they’re throwing racial epithets, saying the n-word, [asking] ‘What kind of black person am I?’ All sorts of homophobic epithets.
Monroe originally found herself assaulted by over 50 calls a day, although they have petered off to about 20.
Monroe’s situation perfectly highlights the dangerous debate brewing within America’s black communities – and, in fact, all over the world: to which social group do people owe an alliance: their racial comrades, their pious peers or their sexual sisters? If only people could look past these arbitrary divides and focus on our shared humanity. Too bad Barack Obama can’t understand such a concept. If he did, he may have a shot at being president. If he keeps this up, he’s going to alienate two of our nation’s most powerful social groups: the gays and the blacks. And then where will he be? Possibly the unemployment line.
Kamasutra Jones
Thank you Queerty for continuing to expose the Obama doubletalk on equality issues and his support of conservative Christian values. This is something that more queer voters need to know. His opinions are not that vastly different from Rudy Guiliani’s on this issue, and all the while Rudy has been blasted by the queer media for his stance on the issue. What’s good for the elephant should be equally as good for the donkey. And good for Rev. Monroe for exposing his hypocrisy.
James
It’s not double-talk. Like most mainstream pols (who have a shot at being president), he’s against same-sex marriage. I think it’s more than fair to be critical of his stances, but unfortunately Obama is not out of the mainstream when it comes to same-sex marriage (excluding younger voters of course).
“If only people could look past these arbitrary divides and focus on our shared humanity.”
This is very cute and idealistic but I think history proves how difficult this is.
Michael
I totally agree Kamasutra Jone and Rev. Monroe got it dead on correct…indeed, it was one of my str8 friends who first said be leery of Obama since he is not gay friendly and has expressed homophobic positions and this proves it. I believe Rev. Monroe has been on “In the Life” on PBS and she is a remarkable woman of substance and she always speaks truth to power. I have tremendous respect and admiration for Rev. Monroe….I thank her for bringing truth to power.
I also believe that Rudy Giuliani’s positions on GLBT issues have always been progressive and far more so then Obama’s and Clinton’s….he campaigned in 1993 to be elected Mayor with a promise to enact domestic partnerships as his first act as Mayor and in fact he got that passed by the City Council.
As has been said, I am very leery of Obama…and I believe his positions are homophobic. I have read in his book where he double speaks on the issue of same sex marriage. I also find it ironic that he taught constitutional law for 10 years and speaks in his book about the need for equality for all Americans yet he seeks to deny our community equal rights….it angers me to no end!
John
Obama’s professed opposition to gay marriage because of his “religion” is highly dubious. His church (the Unitarians) is in fact one of the more liberal of the Protestant denominations. And 80% of the delegates to its General Synod voted to endorse same-sex marriage in 2005.
More likely, Obama is using the Christian faith as “cover” for expressing discriminatory beliefs that’s popular with the masses…in a cynical attempt to increase his chances of becoming president. Hmmm…where have we seen this movie before?
Michael
I know how Rev Mornoe feels….I have stated what she said and have been screamed at..geesh even in my posts here…I was roundly criticized and called names when I said Obama is homophobic…it was in a different thread but at least I now know I am not alone in my suspicions and beliefs.
Kamasutra Jones
James, I do agree with most of your comments. My point was more about how most gay media vilifies Republican politicians, especially Guiliani, but never look at the Democrats and their anti-marriage ideas.
haha
hey- it looks like she borrowed that sweater from bill cosby!!!
Andrew
Good job to Monroe for calling Obama out on his half-hearted support for queer issues.
Since he lacks the concrete voting record that will haunt Clinton, Edwards and co., he often seems to be more queer-friendly that he is.
Hopefully more queers will realize that investing in the Democratic party that panders to religious conservatives almost as much as the Republican Party does won’t bring about change anytime soon.
Queers and other oppressed groups need to support 3rd parties which support them and send a clear message to the political establishment.
James
KS,
Fair point.Personally I tend to distrust all politicians, no matter where they are on the political divide.
cjc
Kudos for the good Rev. to point this out. However, if I may, Obama is not a Unitarian, John, he’s a member of a Chicago congregation that’s affiliated with the United Church of Christ — which has been LGBT friendly for years. So I agree, his stances are somewhat questionable if they come from his “religion.”
Americans like us
I’m confused, is her stance that Mr. Barak Obama restrain his beliefs and allow himself to be chastised be people of a different belief for the sol purpose of making the 82% Christian society accept their voices ? I am a person who believes that any divisive reteric used to bolster your point of view will always be counter productive.
We as Christians belive in Gods instruction manual, the bible, and to the best of our ability try living up to Christ’s example in order for us to maintain a healthy relationship with our heavenly father, we cannot attempt to be selective in what we belive since we were not given that option by God. Now , I no alot of gay people would like for us to ignore that catastrophic event that destroyed to major cities, Sodom and Gommorah, because of the abhorant sexual acts being performed but it did take place and it was written for our protection and awareness of what God will not tolerate. I’m in no way implying that you should be destroyed, God will be the judge not I, but Mr. Obama did clearly say that civil unions should be the Gay society’s answer to marriage in which I completely agree. Why mimic a heterasexuall relationship when it is quite clear that your relationship is different from ours, you guys can embrace civil unions as your own type of marriage enabling rights and securities bestowed on it as in marriage’s. Obama was not trying to impede on your rights as an individual but expressing his point of view in sympathetic terms only, AND IF YOU CAN’T SEE THAT FOR WHAT IT WAS THEN MAYBE YOUR NOT LOOKING FOR EQUAL RIGHTS BUT QUITE FRANKLY NEEDING THE SPOTLIGHT FOR SELFISH REASONS.
cjc
Americans like us–the Bible is not something written by the Almighty’s direct hand. It’s been misinterpreted, mistranslated, retranslated, spun and hung out on the line to excuse all sorts of things or condemn others. In fact the whole Sodom and Gommorah story has been interpreted in different ways to mean different things–immorality of rape, immorality of inhospitality, etc. The Bible is a guideline, not a paddle. If you want to start arguing Biblical inerrancy, fine. But don’t expect everyone to tow your party line.
Michael
Andrew at the rate we are going, with what the 2 major political parties are offering, I probably will vote 3rd party candidate. I like Giuliani and Edwards…I think both would be good Presidents..I believe Giuliani has an excellent pro gay rights record. I also like Edwards…sadly, I don’t believe neither will be receive their party’s nominations..which will leave me voting for a 3rd party candidate….and I am hoping there is a 3rd party candidate at there that is viable and offers honesty and decent positions.
time will tell…..but I do applaud and respect Rev. Monroe a great deal and she speaks tremendous truth to power……something more people need to do.
I distrust Obama for doing what he does….he reminds me of shades of George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” and that religious civic tone of both scares met to no end…..and those touches of born again…..I had enough of that in the last 7 years..no more please.
John
cjc — You’re right. I stand corrected. I don’t recall where I got the idea that he was a Unitarian from (probably read it somewhere).
As for God destroying cities for homosexuality. Please, name one major city in the world where there aren’t any gay people? Even in the most repressive and moralistic regimes, I can guarantee you that there’s a lot of “abhorrent sexual acts” going on just under the surface.
In the United States alone, cities with large LGBT populatons include: Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, New Orleans, Chicago, Minneapolis, Denver, Atlanta, Miami, Washington DC, New York, Philadelphia, and Boston. If the Lord really cares to send brimstone and fire our way, one would imagine he would’ve done it a couple decades ago.
And if we can’t be “selective” in our beliefs… I sincerely hope you’re not working on Sundays, eating any lobsters, wearing polyester/cotton blends, or using any form of contraception.
dizz
It really doesn’tmatter. The majority of americans hate civil rights for gay people. Americans in general use their made up religeon to try to back it up. Obama is as fake as the rest of them (he needs votes to run the phony government). The only chance we have is to rise up against usa society norms of repression and the values of hate that it supports and practice reisistance and protest. It may be too late.
Chris
Who cares!! Obama o8..Chris..Ca