Comments on: Scaring People About Gay Adoption Is Easier When You Substitute Less Attractive People

By: Taylor Siluwé

Taylor Siluwé — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:39:09 +0000

This post gave me the giggles for a minute.

Don’t know why. Maybe the twisted deviousness of it all. And to claim it was an accident (wink, wink), by good Christians doing deceiving for the Lord — undoubtedly wearing one of those Tony Perkins (FRC) creepy smiles. It’s either all very funny, or I was just hysterical for a minute.

But I wanna know about this photo on the left. Who are those people? Is it a mock up? It looks like it could be from the 80′s. But if its current? What if they are real people who may be reading whole thread? Hmmmm….

I think I’ll shut up now.

By: Lukas P.

Lukas P. — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:29:59 +0000

So, maybe I missed something: was the original article with the nasty photos retracted, was an apology issued, and was guilt assigned?

Talk about tabloid journalism!

Desperate people do stupid things.
SHAMEFUL tactics.

By: B

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:14:45 +0000

No. 5 · scott ny’er wrote, “As another poster said, even if they were monsters, that doesn’t mean they won’t be good parents.” … the question is whether they are actors/models being told to frown and dress weirdly for the picture!

By: scott ny'er

scott ny'er — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:57:43 +0000

THEY’RE MONSTERS!!! Get ‘em.

I must say… brilliant and devious and despicable. As another poster said, even if they were monsters, that doesn’t mean they won’t be good parents. But as studies have shown, looks mean a whole lot and can sway a lot of people. If you’re pretty, then you are brilliant, get a higher income, etc.

By: B

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:38:56 +0000

Also check out http://blogs.orlandosentinel.c.....stake.html … after being publicly humiliated, the homophobes are attributing it to an error made by “staff”, discovered within 24 hours. As it turns out, it seems to have taken a lot longer than 24 hours to correct this “mistake”.

As if that picture wouldn’t raise some red flags when viewed by anyone with half a brain. Those people are lucky they aren’t being sued for defamation.

By: Charles

Charles — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:52:51 +0000

Was it a one yr. old girl or boy?? Who proof reads these articles???

By: Ms Loaf

Ms Loaf — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:15:43 +0000

Yes, but the point is even if you’re not beautiful, even if you are the couple on the left, that doesn’t mean you’ll be a bad parent. It’s not just the pretty people who need equal rights, it’s the rest of us, too.

By: terrwill

terrwill — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:45:03 +0000

Its amazing that such a group of inbred lunatics could come up with such a brilliant idea…….those two fuglys on the left look like the hate children of James Dobson and Maggot Gallagher………

As for John Scumberger the only thing that would make his mug more attractive is a burlap sack…………….